Permit Decision Delayed by DNR for Sulfide Mine

|
011408-no_sulfide_mining.gif

On Thursday, the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR) announced that it is delaying a decision to approve two permits related to a proposed sulfide mine in the Upper Peninsula. The mine--which has been opposed by a variety of citizens groups--needs a permit from the DNR for 120 acres of aboveground operations near Marquette, Michigan.

According to articles appearing on the Associated Press newswire and in the Mining Journal, the DNR chose to delay a decision on the permits--originally scheduled for Thursday--after Kennecott Eagle Mineral failed to respond to specific questions raised by the DNR. These questions--raised in a December 7, 2007 letter from the DNR to Kennecott--sought information about how Kennecott would respond to any subsidence (collapse) occurring over the ore body during mining operations, what corrective actions would be taken if more water flows into the mine than expected, and why these 120 acres are required rather than adjacent land owned by Kennecott. Even with these questions, DNR staffers have reportedly "endorsed" the mine, yet are seeking additional information to prevent the permit from being challenged in court.

Despite the ambiguity in the media over the exact reasons for the delay, opponents of the sulfide mine are hopeful that it will further delay the mine. For the past few years, critics have argued that the mine will be ecologically destructive and that the government should not issue the required permits. In a press release responding to the decision, the National Wildlife Federation said, "The DNR has made the right decision to not rubber stamp a risky mine that has proven deadly to rivers, streams and communities all over the world... It's not worth the risk to our economy, health and way of life." The press release also noted that it is "unprecedented" for the State of Michigan to allow an open-ended lease for private corporate gain.

Last month, the Michigan DEQ issued permits for the mine. In response, opponents sued and the case is currently waiting to be heard. A permit from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is also required but has not been issued.

Mine opponents have also said they had a lawsuit ready to be filed and were ready to do so if the DNR permits had been issued.

Email Updates

Subscribe

Receive our articles automatically:

Donate

Media Mouse is reader funded and relies on contributions to provide unique reporting and research.

donate

Bloom Collective

bloom collective logo

Media Mouse is part of the Bloom Collective, an infoshop and lending library located at 1134 Wealthy St SE. The Bloom Collective offers a wide variety of resources to promote social change.

Promote Mediamouse.org

You can help promote Mediamouse.org by printing and distributing flyers or by adding us as a friend on the following social networks:

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by published on January 14, 2008 1:49 PM.

Huckabee Speaks in Grand Rapids was the previous entry in this blog.

Trial Sought in Proposal 2 Case is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

About Mediamouse.org

Mediamouse.org is a left and progressive website providing independent news, media, analysis, and commentary covering Grand Rapids, Michigan and beyond. We aim to inspire grassroots activism to transform our community, our lives, and our world.

Get Active

We hope that this site will function as a catalyst for action. We urge you to get involved either with the groups listed in the Progressive Directory or by attending local events.