Online is in big

|

Analysis:

This story is based up a Democratic Party presidential candidate forum that was hosted by cable news network CNN and the online video site YouTube. The subheading says that "youtube questions shake up Democratic debate." After reading the story do you think that this youtube question format "shook up" the debate? The first paragraph also states that the candidates were asked questions about Iraq, the military draft and "the candidate's place in the political system." There are some candidate responses to the first two questions, but not about where the candidates are in the political system.

The story then shifts to 3 video questions that have each have very short answers from some of the candidates. Ask yourself why the story has responses from only some of the candidates. The story does say that that CNN "screened" the questions posted on Youtube, but no details about the screening/selection process. Next there are questions posed about Darfur, health care, global warming and gun control, but no responses from candidates on each of these serious questions.

The bulk of the article is focused on questions and answers surrounding Iraq, but only responses from five of the eight candidates. Of the responses from candidates there is no verification or follow up by the Associated Press reporter. The article concludes with a few comments on videos that pick fun at the candidates, particularly Edwards and Clinton.

Story:

Young, Internet-savvy voters challenged Democratic presidential hopefuls on Iraq, the military draft and the candidates' own place in a broken political system, playing starring roles in a provocative, video-driven debate Monday night.

"Wassup?" came the first question, from a voter named Zach, after another, named Chris, opened the CNN-YouTube debate with a barb aimed at the entire eight-candidate field: "Can you as politicians ... actually answer questions rather than beat around the bush?"

The answer was a qualified yes. The candidates faced a slew of blunt questions - from earnest to the ridiculous - and, in many cases, responded in kind.

To Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois: Are you black enough? "You know, when I'm catching a cab in Manhattan ... in the past, I think I've given my credentials," he replied.

To Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York: Are you feminine enough? "I couldn't run as anything other than a woman," she said.

Her answer drew a challenge from former Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina, who said he was the best advocate for women among the contenders. "I have the strongest, boldest ideas," he said.

Posing a question that few, if any, of the candidates had fielded before, one voter asked whether young women should register with the Selective Service, as do young men in case the draft is reinstated. Clinton, Obama and Sen. Chris Dodd of Connecticut said yes.

The debate featured questions submitted to the online video community YouTube and screened by the all-news cable TV network. A talking snowman, two rednecks and a woman speaking from her bathroom were among the odd, Internet-age twists to the oldest forum in politics - a debate.

A Clio, Mich., man named Jered asked about gun control while brandishing an automatic weapon.

"He needs help," Sen. Joe Biden of Delaware snapped.

When was the last time a presidential candidate was forced to promise to work at minimum wage? That is effectively what happened when a voter asked whether the candidates would serve four years at $5.85 an hour rather than the president's annual $400,000 salary.

"Sure," replied Clinton.

The gathering was held at the military college of The Citadel in South Carolina, site of one of the earliest primaries - Jan. 29. Fittingly, the Democrats skirmished over the Iraq war and other foreign policy issues.

Asked if Democrats are playing politics with the war, Rep. Dennis Kucinich of Ohio said yes. "The Democrats have failed the American people," he said.

Former Alaska Sen. Mike Gravel said U.S. soldiers are dying in vain. No other candidate would go that far.

Obama took the opportunity to take a slap at his rivals who voted to give Bush authority to invade Iraq, including Clinton and Edwards. "The time to ask how we were going to get out of Iraq was before we went in," he said, without naming Clinton or Edwards.

Gov. Bill Richardson of New Mexico said he's the only candidate pledging to remove troops within six months. Biden said Richardson's goal was unrealistic.

Sensing her position was under attack, Clinton bristled as she argued that U.S. troops must be removed from Iraq "safely and orderly and carefully."

Obama said he would be willing to meet individually with the leaders of Iran, Syria, Venezuela, Cuba and North Korea during the first year of his presidency. "The notion that somehow not talking to countries is punishment to them, which has been the guiding diplomatic principle of this administration, is ridiculous," Obama said to applause.

Clinton immediately disagreed and said she would send envoys first to find out their intentions. "I don't want to be used for propaganda purposes," she said. Her campaign quickly posted the video on her Web site, trying to draw a distinction with her chief rival and show she has a different understanding of foreign policy.

On another foreign policy topic, Biden said he would send 2,500 U.S. troops to Darfur to try to end the civil war there. It took three tries to get Clinton to answer the same questions. She finally said U.S. ground troops don't belong in the fight because they are overextended in Iraq.

She also refused to call herself a liberal. "I prefer the word progressive, which has a real American meaning ...," she said.

Clinton, Obama and Edwards lead in most polls of the Democratic field.

The opening question challenged Democrats to do better than the failed leadership in Congress and the White House. "How are you going to be any different?" the voter asked.

Obama, a freshmen lawmaker trying to appeal to the public's thirst for change, replied, "One of the things I bring is a perspective ... that says Washington has to change."

Clinton claimed she has a 35-year-record as an agent of change. "The issue is which of us is to lead on Day One."

The Democratic gathering marked a turning point in political communications. CNN, a landmark all-news cable network when founded 27 years ago, is now part of a media establishment coming to terms with upstarts like the 2½-year-old online video community.

The debate aside, YouTube has already left its mark on politics. Republican George Allen lost his Senate seat and a likely spot in the 2008 presidential race after a YouTube video caught him referring to a man of South Asian decent as "macaca" - an ethnic slur in some countries.

In the presidential campaign, buzz-worthy video clips have included Bill and Hillary Clinton's spoof of "The Sopranos" finale, Edwards' combing his hair to the tune "I Feel Pretty," and a buxom model professing her crush on Obama.

In the spirit of the era, each candidate was asked to produce his or her own video.

Edwards' video poked fun at the attention paid to his pricey haircuts at the expense of more serious issues. Set to the theme from the 1968 musical "Hair," the video opens with several close-up of hairdos, giving way to less frivolous images including several from Iraq. It ends with a white-on-black slide: "What really matters? You Choose"

Clinton's video-ad ended with the kicker, "Sometimes the best man for a job is a woman."

Email Updates

Subscribe

Receive our articles automatically:

Donate

Media Mouse is reader funded and relies on contributions to provide unique reporting and research.

donate

Bloom Collective

bloom collective logo

Media Mouse is part of the Bloom Collective, an infoshop and lending library located at 1134 Wealthy St SE. The Bloom Collective offers a wide variety of resources to promote social change.

Promote Mediamouse.org

You can help promote Mediamouse.org by printing and distributing flyers or by adding us as a friend on the following social networks:

grand rapids institute for information democracy

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Media Mouse published on July 24, 2007 1:28 PM.

Hoekstra Q&A: Pakistan needs to cooperate was the previous entry in this blog.

Mayor's race shifts into high gear is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

About Mediamouse.org

Mediamouse.org is a left and progressive website providing independent news, media, analysis, and commentary covering Grand Rapids, Michigan and beyond. We aim to inspire grassroots activism to transform our community, our lives, and our world.

Get Active

We hope that this site will function as a catalyst for action. We urge you to get involved either with the groups listed in the Progressive Directory or by attending local events.