Media Ignores Obama's True Position on Iraq

| | Comments (0)

Since last week, Democratic Party presidential candidate Barack Obama has received considerable coverage in the corporate media for an apparent "reversal" on his Iraq policy.

An article published on July 4 by the Telegraph titled "Barack Obama Wobbles on Withdrawing Iraq Troops" was typical of this coverage. In it, reporter Tim Shipman explains that Obama's recent comments that his Iraq policy will be "refined" based on what he sees on the ground during an upcoming visit to Iraq, is a reversal of his commitment to "remove one to two combat brigades each month, and have all of our combat brigades out of Iraq within 16 months." The article then quotes an advisor to Republican presidential candidate John McCain who accuses Obama of reversing his position. The article concludes by quoting Obama in response saying, "I've given no indication of a change in policy. I intend to end this war. That position has not changed. I have not equivocated on that position. I am not searching for maneuvering room with respect to that position."

However, lost in the predictable media back-and-forth is the reality that Obama's position on Iraq has not changed. To be sure, the media gives Obama space to say that his position has not changed, but they continue to ignore the nuances of Obama's position. While he claims that he will "end this war," his Iraq policy--as described on his website and articulated in numerous speeches--would leave an undetermined number of soldiers in Iraq for an undetermined amount of time. Obama speaks only of removing "combat troops" while planning to leave an unknown number of soldiers in Iraq to engage al-Qaeda. Moreover, Obama has surrounded himself with hawkish advisors who have been involved in the destruction of Iraq since the first Gulf War. However, the media has ignored this, as has much of the progressive left in the United States. For example, Media Matters, a liberal media watchdog, defended Obama from the McCain campaign's charges while failing to challenge Obama on his claim that he will "end the war."

However, while some on the left have criticized Obama for his position, there has been relatively little talk about how to pressure Obama on Iraq. Tom Hayden, the former president of Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) has offered some ideas, as has author Naomi Klein. The task for the antiwar movement is not simply to embrace or criticize Barack Obama, but how to build a movement powerful enough that he has no choice but to end the war.

Leave a comment

Email Updates

Subscribe

Receive our articles automatically:

Donate

Media Mouse is reader funded and relies on contributions to provide unique reporting and research.

donate

Bloom Collective

bloom collective logo

Media Mouse is part of the Bloom Collective, an infoshop and lending library located at 1134 Wealthy St SE. The Bloom Collective offers a wide variety of resources to promote social change.

Promote Mediamouse.org

You can help promote Mediamouse.org by printing and distributing flyers or by adding us as a friend on the following social networks:

grand rapids institute for information democracy

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Media Mouse published on July 8, 2008 5:15 PM.

Naomi Klein on Obama and the Role of Social Movements in Presidential Elections was the previous entry in this blog.

McCain Jokes about "Killing" Iranians is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

About Mediamouse.org

Mediamouse.org is a left and progressive website providing independent news, media, analysis, and commentary covering Grand Rapids, Michigan and beyond. We aim to inspire grassroots activism to transform our community, our lives, and our world.

Get Active

We hope that this site will function as a catalyst for action. We urge you to get involved either with the groups listed in the Progressive Directory or by attending local events.