Category Archives: News

Students Against Sweatshops GVSU Calls for Community Support in Campaign Against Taco Bell

The third year of Students Against Sweatshops GVSU’s (SAS-GVSU) campaign to remove Taco Bell from Grand Valley State University is reaching a critical stage. Taco Bell is currently profiting from tomatoes made in exploitative conditions in where tomato pickers receive no benefits and have a median wage of only $7,500 (Click here for more on working conditions). Tomorrow the group will confront the administration in a public meeting and demand that Grand Valley stop supporting exploitative labor practices and remove Taco Bell from campus.

Over the past three years the group has used a number of different tactics–educational forums, classroom teach-ins, hosting visits from people who work in the fields of Immokalee, large-scale distribution of booklets outlining conditions in Immokalee, visible protests on and off campus, private meetings with the administration, and an extensive petition drive. The time has come to intensify the campaign and make the issue impossible for the university to ignore–and for that it is critical that the group demonstrate strong student and community support.

One of the easiest ways to demonstrate community support is through a letter writing campaign. SAS-GVSU is asking community members to send a quick email* to Michael Doxey, Director of Business Services at Grand Valley. Michael Doxey has the power to remove Taco Bell from campus and has refused to act–thereby supporting exploitative conditions in Immokalee.

Urgent Action: Send an Email Telling GVSU to Cut their Contract with Taco Bell

* The email is automatically sent after filling out a simple form.

Grand Rapids Commission Passes Anti-PATRIOT Act Resolution

In a 6 to 1 vote, the Grand Rapids City Commission passed a resolution opposing the USA PATRIOT Act. The resolution was the result of a campaign by Citizens for a Safe and Free Grand Rapids. In passing this resolution, Grand Rapids joins 278 other communities who have passed resolutions opposing the USA PATRIOT Act.

Among the key provisions of the resolution:

  • “The Grand Rapids City Commission opposes the use of any laws, including the USA PATRIOT ACT or the enforcement of those laws, that infringe upon the rights of any persons, including the right of peaceable assembly, freedom of speech, religion and political advocacy.”
  • “The City Commission condemns discrimination or harassment against persons who are Arab American, Muslim Americans and Americans from South Asia”
  • “The Grand Rapids City Commission urges Congress not to re-authorize those sections of the USA PATRIOT ACT which expire in 2005.”

In addition, a copy of the resolution will be sent to President George W. Bush, Attorney General John Ashcroft, United States Senators Carl Levin and Debbie Stabenow, and U.S. Representative Vern Ehlers.

Additional Resources:

GRPD Chief Dolan Admits to Spying on Antiwar Protestors

In a front page article in the Grand Rapids Press, Harry Dolan, Chief of the Grand Rapids Police Department (GRPD), admitted to sending undercover officers to infiltrate meetings of groups opposed to the invasion of Iraq as part of a campaign of surveillance of the antiwar movement beginning with the protest against George W. Bush on January 29, 2003. The Press article built on previous reports of police surveillance including an article published on the Michigan Independent Media Center by Media Mouse in March of 2003 and an article on the internet news magazine salon.com in February of 2004.

Given the history of state-sponsored surveillance and disruption of popular movements for social change in the United States, specifically the FBI’s COINTELPRO during the 1960s and 1970s, it is not surprising that the state would engage in surveillance of the antiwar movement on some level. However, it is surprising that the GRPD would expend money and resources on a movement that has a history of using rallies, educational efforts, and a few symbolic acts of civil disobedience to show opposition to the war–nothing that could be perceived as a threat and certainly nothing like the property destruction Dolan cites during the Seattle WTO protests in 1999.

In the GR Press article, Dolan claims that the infiltration began after he received reports that activists were planning to block Michigan Avenue. However, the action proposal he is referring to was only mentioned at the first meeting the GRPD sent an undercover officer to and therefore could not have provided the basis for infiltration. The GRPD has admitted to using undercover officers, monitoring internet sites, and videotaping people attending antiwar rallies.

Many questions remain about the GRPD’s surveillance of antiwar protestors in Grand Rapids–who ordered it, how much inter-agency cooperation was there, was it terminated, and most importantly, what was done with the video and other information gathered during surveillance.

It is also worth noting that surveillance of antiwar protestors in Grand Rapids did not occur in a vaccuum and was only one of many cities where this occurred. Moreover, the state is not limiting itself to surveillance, rather it is increasingly moving towards the criminalization of dissent. Protests against the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) in November of 2003 in the city of Miami epitomize this new criminalization–there was an intense media campaign to equate all protestors with criminals (and in many cases, terrorists), people were arrested and harassed for simply looking like “activists” in the weeks leading up to the protests, and once the protests began, they were suppressed with extensive force. This new approach has been described as “the Miami Model” and may be indicative of how future protests will be handled.

Grand Rapids Press Article on Police Surveillance

On Sunday March 28, the Grand Rapids Press ran a front page story about police surveillance of anti-war groups. This is the first time that the local mainstream media has run a story on this topic. The link to the GR Press online version is here. If you would rather not go the GR Press website, the article can be read on Michigan IMC here.

U.S.-Backed Right Wing Candidate Wins in El Salvador

On last Sunday, March 21, the people of El Salvador went to the polls to elect a government. The right-wing ARENA party won the election decisively, gaining 58% of the vote compared to the 38% of the vote that the leftist FMLN party received. The US-backed ARENA party was founded by Roberto D’Aubuisson in the early 1980′s. D’Aubuisson was named in the United Nations Truth Commission Report as the intellectual author of the assassination of Archbishop Oscar Romero in 1980. Arena received the verbal backing of the US government which included veiled threats that the US would punish El-Salvador if FMLN won the election. According to an article in Counterpunch by Joe DeRaymond:

The Special Envoy of the White House to Latin America, Otto Reich, laid it directly on the line on March 13, in a telephone interview conducted from the ARENA offices in San Salvador: “We would not be able to have the same confidence in an El Salvador led by a person who is obviously an admirer of Fidel Castro and Hugo Chavez, as we have today in (ARENA President) Flores.” Reich continued to warn that a win by the FMLN would cause a reevaluation of the United States relationship with El Salvador.

To read an firsthand account of last weeks election by a West-Michigan based activist, check out Wes Rehberg’s article on the Nonviolent Ways Project website:

Anti-PATRIOT Act Resolution to be voted on by City Commission

On March 30 at 2pm the Grand Rapids City Commission will be voting on an anti-PATRIOT Act resolution. This resolution is the result of an anti-PATRIOT Act campaign by a group called Citizens for a Safe and Free Grand Rapids. At this point it is still up in the air whether or not the resolution will get passed. Mayor Heartwell and Commissioner Tormala are committed to voting for it. Commissioner Rabaut is against it and Commissioners Jendrasiak, Schmidt, Dean and White are on the fence. The GR Police Department is against the resolution, a factor which has influenced some commissioners willingness to support the resolution. If you are in favor of the city passing this resolution, please contact the four commissioners that are still undecided and let them know how you feel.

You can contact them by calling 456-3035 or e-mail them at the addresses below:

James Jendrasiak [email protected]

Roy Schmidt [email protected]

Lynn Rabaut [email protected]

Robert Dean [email protected]

James B. White [email protected]

You can also contact Mayor Heartwell and commissioner Tormala and thank them for their support here:

Mayor George Heartwell [email protected]

Rick Tormala [email protected]

The Resolution can be downloaded here

For more information on the USA PATRIOT Act, click here

Richard Clarke Set to Testify before Commission Investigating 9/11

Richard Clarke, a former counter-terrorism official in the Clinton and Bush administration, will be testifying today before the Commission investigating the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Richard Clarke’s new book and a recent interview with CBS have garnered considerable attention for its criticism of the Bush administration’s “war on terror” and their pre-9/11 anti-terrorism efforts.

Among the most interesting revelations:

  • Officials in the Bush administration did not take the threat of Al Qaeda seriously before 9/11 and ignored requests for cabinet-level meetings on the subject.
  • The Bush administration sought to link Iraq to 9/11 from the start, continuing a policy in the administration that looked to Iraq as a source of more terrorism than Al Qaeda. Moreover, Clarke believes that there was indirect pressure to make the case that Iraq was involved without regard to evidence.
  • In Clarke’s estimation, President Bush’s “war on terrorism” has made the United States and the world less safe and has exacerbated the threat of terrorism by fulfilling Osama bin Laden’s propaganda that the US wanted to invade an oil-rich Arab country and occupy it, thus providing both motivation and a valuable recruiting tool to Al Qaeda and similar groups.

Many of Clarke’s statements corroborate positions taken by the antiwar movement and other critics of the invasion of Iraq. Many opponents pointed to the fact that there was no connection between Iraq and Al Qaeda, that many officials in the Bush Administration were members of the Project for a New American Century and had long sought an invasion of Iraq, and that the administration never outright dismissed a connection between Iraq and 9/11 as a way of propagating the idea that the two were inextricably linked.

Not surprisingly, the White House has launched a vicious campaign discredit Clarke. The administration has portrayed Clarke as a partisan who carefully timed the release of his book to aid Senator John Kerry’s presidential campaign. However, Clarke is a long-term public servant who has worked in the government for thirty years under three Republican and one Democratic administration, and is in fact a Republican. Moreover, Clarke is not an advocate of inaction–during both the Clinton and Bush administrations he advocated an aggressive policy against Al Qaeda and sought a campaign designed to destroy the organization’s Afghanistan training camps and to assassinate Osama bin Laden.

More Information:

Assasination of Sheikh Yassin

Israel’s assasination of Hamas spiritual leader Sheikh Yassin is, in the words of Israeli writer Uri Avnery, worse than a crime, it is an act of stupidity. While the “Roadmap to Peace,” like it’s Oslo Accord predecessor, was never really a serious attempt by Israel and the US to create a viable Palestinian state, this assassination destroys whatever limited potential those plans held. This attack is typical of the Sharon government�s strategy of provoking violence in order to provide a pretext for the continued oppression of Palestinian people and appropriation of Palestinian land. There will be no peace in Israel/Palestine until the occupation of Palestinian land ends and a viable Palestinian state is created. This is unlikely to happen unless the massive amount of US aid that Israel relies upon is stopped.

So what are the options progressives have for ending US aid to Israel? Certainly not either of the two major political parties or presidential candidates. While President Bush and his Neo-con administration have aligned US foreign policy even more closely to Israel’s, the relationship always has been tight. This has been true under both Democratic and Republican administrations, and it would be unlikely to change under a Kerry presidency. Few politicians in the US have the means or the courage to stand up to the pro-Israel lobby. Unless US progressives can create a large grassroots movement with the power to challenge the political lobbying power of AIPAC (America Israel Public Affairs Committee), the occupation of Palestine will continue.

More Information:

Election Notes

The Bush campaign has rolled out a new on-line ad attacking John Kerry for being beholden to special interests. While this is certainly a valid criticism of John Kerry, it is hypocritical in the extreme for the Bush campaign to criticize anyone for taking money from special interests. Interestingly, the Bush ad includes data from, and a picture of, the website for the Center for Public Integrity. CPI does an excellent job in tracking and documenting corporate and political malfeasance and in particular has done a great job in researching who is financially backing the presidential candidates. The Bush ad states that Kerry has taken over $ 600,000 in special interest money, a fact well worth noting. Ironically, on the front page of the IPC site is a study stating that right now Bush has individual donors, such as MNBA and Enron, which have given Bush over $ 600,000 each. See below for a comparison on the top ten career patrons of both Bush and Kerry. For more information on the funding of Presidential candidates, check out CPI�s excellent study The Buying of the President.

While Bush has been running ads regularly on all three Grand Rapids based TV channels, Kerry has yet to air any ads in the West Michigan market. Whether this is due to part of a campaign strategy or a lack of money by Kerry is hard to say. We do know that up to the end of January, the Bush campaign had a daily average raised of $497,832 compared to $104,899 for Kerry. Regardless, the fact that the electoral process requires this level of fundraising raises some very troubling questions about how American democracy works. Candidates that are outside the two party duopoly are frozen out from the process and voters feel that they have to vote for the lesser of two evils. Even Noam Chmosky in a recent interview, begrudgingly endorses voting for Kerry:

My feeling is pretty much the way it was in the year 2000. I admire Ralph Nader and Dennis Kucinich very much, and insofar as they bring up issues and carry out an educational and organizational function – that’s important, and fine, and I support it.

However, when it comes to the choice between the two factions of the business party, it does sometimes, in this case as in 2000, make a difference. A fraction.

Phil Gaspar provides a counter arguement to Chomsky’s stance of choosing the lesser evil:

Making decisions about the presidential election on the basis of the minute differences between the two major party candidates is ultimately a mug’s game. Whoever wins in November, we’ll need the biggest and most militant social movements on the ground to fight their policies, but when activists get sucked into support for the Democrats the movements are weakened and sometimes destroyed.

Meanwhile, Ralph Nader is running again. Many questions remain about his campaign. Will he get backing from existing third parties such as the Reform or Green parties? Will he even be able to get on the ballots in most states? Regardless of the viability of his campaign, it must be recognized that Nader is not a “spoiler” stealing votes from the Democrats. Nader’s platform is significantly different from the corporate financed Democrats, calling for greater accountability for corporations and an end to corporate-controlled government.

Grand Rapids Peace Group Holds Antiwar Rally as Part of Global Day of Action

Approximately 300 people attended a rally organized by the West Michigan Justice and Peace Coalition today in downtown Grand Rapids. The rally was held in solidarity with the rallies and protests in over 200 cities around the world in response to United for Peace and Justice’s (UPJ) call for protests on the one-year anniversary of the invasion of Iraq.

Participants expressed their opposition to the United States illegal war on Iraq through signs, speakers, poetry, and songs. The rally did not make any specific demands opening the space for a variety of opinions—speakers called for an end to the lies used to justify the war, regime change in the United States, an end to the occupation of Iraq, an end to the occupation of Palestine, and even resistance to global capitalism. Signs presented a variety of messages—anger towards President Bush’s lies, “peace is patriotic,” “ban all biological and nuclear weapons,” “we’ve been bu$hwacked,” “imperialism breeds terror,” and others. Following the speakers there was a memorial for the fifteen soldiers from West Michigan who died in the war and a march around the block. As was the case with most antiwar actions in Grand Rapids, counter-protesters came to shout incoherent statements reflecting an unquestioning adoption of official US policy and an inability to think critically (or even form semi-valid arguments).

The rally was the first major action by antiwar activists in Grand Rapids since Vice President Dick Cheney’s June 2003 visit. The lack of visible opposition to the war was one of the reasons for the “global day of action”—it is hoped that the today’s events will reawaken an antiwar movement that has been incredibly inactive despite the ongoing occupation of Iraq and the continuing occupation of Afghanistan. While the antiwar movement was ultimately unable to stop the war, millions of people protested on February 15, 2003 and on the start of the war activists in San Francisco and other cities staged large protests designed to disrupt the state’s capacity to wage war. Even in Grand Rapids, there was an incredible surge in activism—a 400 person protest in October of 2002, a large, and by comparison to others in Grand Rapids, defiant protest against President Bush during his visit to Grand Rapids, a campaign for a city resolution opposing the war, weekly protests outside the Federal Building, and numerous other protests and direct actions.

However, today’s rally was indicative of the problems facing the antiwar movement as it attempts to remain relevant. The rally in Grand Rapids, while successful in bringing people together, had relatively few tangible outcomes. There is little traffic in downtown Grand Rapids, and while the march was certainly helpful in increasing visibility, Grand Rapids is not particularly busy on a Saturday afternoon. Moreover, there was no focus or target of opposition. While surrounding buildings, including the Federal Building, banks, and the Grand Rapids Press would provide possibilities for leafleting and other actions linking the war, the military, and the financial apparatus that supports imperialism, all of the buildings are closed. In many ways, this is endemic of the problems facing the antiwar movement—a lot of time and effort is expended organizing events that do not reach far beyond the attendees, and more importantly, present no challenge to the power structures that support war.

Nationally, the antiwar movement appears to be at a crossroads when faced with this reality. The movement seems to be heading in two directions—one which wishes to use the momentum of the antiwar movement to support Senator John Kerry’s candidacy against President Bush in hopes that a change in national leadership will prompt a shift in policy while the other group seeks the creation of a broad-based movement not just against war and occupation, but against “empire” and the power structures that sustain it—whether they be Democrat or Republican. While there are currently no plans for specifically antiwar related actions locally or nationally, this summer has a full slate of protests planned with decentralized actions against capitalism and empire in conjunction with the June meeting of G8, protests in Boston against the Democratic National Convention, and protests against the Republican National Convention in New York City.