Category Archives: News

Protests Against the Iraq War in Grand Rapids and Around the World

Depending on the source, 300 people attended an antiwar rally today in downtown Grand Rapids. It was good to see people visibly opposing the war and occupation, hopefully this event is only the start of renewed resistance–let’s build from this event and use the momentum for planning future actions. Consult the Progressive Directory calendar for upcoming events in the area.

Protests occurred in hundreds of cities around the world. Indymedia.org has a new feature on March 20 while the IMC Germany has a running list of demonstrations with reports and numbers: up to 2 million in Rome, 100,000+ in London, 100,000 in New York City, 20,000 in Portland, and many more.

Independent Coverage of Grand Rapids Event:

Post your own Account:

The Michigan Independent Media Center features an “open-publishing newswire” that allows anyone to post articles and photographs online providing a much needed alternative to the corporate press. In light of the dismal media coverage of today’s rally, it’s probably a good idea. Let us know if you post something and we will add a link to it.

Other Events in Michigan:

Ann Arbor – 2,500 people attended a rally and march.

MichiganIMC Coverage: Photos

Holland – The corporate media reports 40 people attended a rally at Centennial Park.

Lake Orion – The Michigan IMC is reporting that a person riding their bike with a “Honk 4 Peace” sign was arrested for disrupting traffic. (source)

Lansing – 300 people attended an antiwar rally at the capitol featuring a variety of speakers.

MichiganIMC Coverage: 300 Demonstrate against War in Lansing | Photos: 1, 2

Also worth noting is Direct Action’s ongoing organizing against military recruiting at Lansing area high schools. The group has distributed a few hundred copies of “Through the Wire” a newsletter designed to educate and encourage resistance to military recruitment and war.

Traverse City – 200 people attended a “reality tour” addressing the occupation and cuts to social services.

MichiganIMC Coverage: 200 March in Traverse City

White Lake – 130-150 people came out for a rally featuring speakers and musicians.

In addition to events in Michigan, we would like to draw attention to the following actions that attempt to move beyond the symbolic and directly affect the capacity to wage war:

San Francisco – On March 19, activists engaged in a variety of direct actions against the occupation of Iraq. Activists blockaded Bechtel’s headquarters, as Bechtel has a long history of war profiteering. Another group took over an abandoned building to draw attention to San Francisco’s housing shortage and money spent on the Iraq war which could be used to provide housing for the city’s homeless population.

On March 20 there was a mass protest with an estimated 30,000 people in attendance along with a “breakaway” march that disrupted business in a major shopping district based on the theory that war is simultaneously a product and sustainer of capitalism. As would be expected, the police showed that they are agents of the state and protected commerce by arresting and beating protestors (reports/photos: 1, 2).

Pittsburgh – In addition to an permitted rally attended by a couple thousand protestors, the day had a direct action component with the occupation of two buildings on Carnegie Melon University’s campus to draw attention to CMU’s contracts with the Department of Defense. As of this writing, one occupation has ended while the other is ongoing. The occupiers have issued a list of demands calling for an end to known military contracts, full disclosure of contracts, and the redirection of university research to humanitarian needs.

Bay Area and Oregon – Locals affiliated with the International Longshore and Warehouse Union refused to unload ships today, effectively shutting down ports as a statement of solidarity with protests around the world against the occupation of Iraq (source).

Yorkshire, England – Activists blockaded the United States’ Menwith Hill military base, successfully preventing access to workers. Also in England: two protestors unfurled a banner on “Big Ben” in London (source).

One Year Anniversary of the Invasion of Iraq

It has been one year since the illegal invasion of Iraq by the United States. The invasion came after twelve years of economic sanctions that killed 500,000 Iraqi children under the age of 5, almost constant bombing in the US imposed “No-Fly Zones”, and a series of lies used to justify the war. Not surprisingly, the mainstream media is echoing the official line of the Bush Administration by featuring cabinet members and other supporters talking about how the invasion has “made the world a safer place” while ignoring civilian casualties, current dangers facing Iraqi civilians, corporate war profiteering, and the 107+ billion dollar cost of the war.

Independent Evaluations of the Iraq Invasion:

Recent Studies:

March 20 Antiwar Protests in Grand Rapids:

There is an antiwar rally and march tomorrow in downtown Grand Rapids at the Calder Plaza at 1:00pm (on Ionia between Michigan and Ottawa). There has also been a call made for a “Youth Against War” rally and march that will join up with the main rally. That group will be assembling at Grand Rapids Community College at 12:30pm.

There will of course be full coverage of the events on Media Mouse and the Michigan IMC.

West Michigan Companies Profit from Iraq War and Occupation

What little corporate media coverage there has been of war profiteering in Iraq has largely focused on Vice President Dick Cheney’s former company, Halliburton, and the “no-bid” contracts they received for reconstruction related projects in Iraq, despite the fact that numerous other corporations have profited from the war, including companies based in West Michigan. A recent article by Grand Rapids Press Business Editor Nancy Crawley (“The War’s Collateral Benefits” 03/14/04), reported that several local corporations continue to profit from military contracts related to Iraq:

  • Borisch Manufacturing, who was manufacturing radar devices used for targeting 105mm howitzers, recently finished a contract for General Dynamics’ light-armor Stryker vehicle. According to the company’s spokesperson, Matt Borisch, they cannot reveal any specifics about the product.
  • Wolverine World Wide had an existing contract for boots for military, but is currently working on a new “performance leather” being tested by the Marines as well as a bio-chemical boot being tested by special forces soldiers in Iraq.
  • Smiths Aerospace is working on a “Network Centric Warfare” system that would assist in real-time communication and redirection of fighter planes.

With the article written by the Business Editor, one should not be surprised that there is no discussion of the illegal nature of the war, civilian casualties, the ethics of war profiteering, or the lies used as justification. Instead, the article ends with a quaint little conclusion about the benefits of defense industry innovation: “The contracts which have prompted more hiring and investment in this community are important. But it is the innovations that offer the most potential for a better tomorrow for all of us.” After all, profit and progress is the American way–especially if it comes at the expense of non-white people in other countries.

More on War Profiteering and Iraq:

Local TV News looks at Globalization (and gets it all wrong)

On March 1 through 4, 2004 WZZM 13 News did a four part series titled “Michigan to Mexico.” The stated purpose of the stories was to look at life in Juarez Mexico, the city to which many West Michigan companies have relocated. The four stories were by News 13 reporter Chris Tye who spent three days in Juarez. Each segment averaged about 5 minutes in length.

Unfortunately, the “Michigan to Mexico” segments were rather superficial and lacking in context. The pieces tended to over-personalize the issue of job flight while giving little explanatory data. The concerns and condition of the Mexican maquila workers are presented in contradictory fashion, portraying them as both grateful and discontented at the same time. The reporter interviews several Mexican workers as well as going into their homes to illustrate the poverty of their condition. The entire fourth segment consists of the reporter interviewing a young woman who has lived in both Juarez and El Paso. She characterizes life in Juarez by saying “This is the way it is for Mexicans, you have to work, you can’t dream, it’s not like in America, it’s completely different.” Another Mexican who is interviewed says in response to a question about his living condition says “It’s not great, but you get used to it.” Yet in the conclusion of the segment, the reporter states “you’ll be surprised how far they (the maquila workers) can stretch $10 a day and how happy they are to make even that.” The only Mexican interviewed who seems to be “happy” with the wages offered by the maquila is an older woman. In response to a question about the workers in Greenville Michigan, she states “There are a lot of people here who want to work and a lot of people here who want to see more maquilas come, so I don’t feel sorry for them (the Greenville workers).” A close examination of the video clip reveals that the woman’s quote in Spanish is considerably shorter than the English translation, which casts doubt as to whether she really said what was reported.

Throughout the series, the Mexicans interviewed are workers or residents who are asked questions focusing on their personal situation. For contextual information that explains the larger situation, the reporter relies exclusively on American “expert” voices. In particular the reporter relies on the comments of Dr. John Amastae from the University of Texas El Paso. His comments are the only ones used when questions such as the effects of NAFTA or working conditions inside the maquilas are raised. Dr. Amastae speaks in favor of NAFTA and the maquilas. In regards to the maquelas, he states “I think they provide opportunity in the Mexican context, because Mexico, like most developing countries is going through some wrenching economic and social changes.” An appropriate follow-up question to this comment might be to ask what are the factors that are causing these “wrenching” economic and social changes, and how do they relate to trade policies such as NAFTA. No Mexican voices are presented to provide an alternate viewpoint to Dr. Amastae’s comments.

On the question of what working conditions are like inside a maquila, the reporter relies on the viewpoints of Dr. Amastae again as well as an American plant manager. Instead of talking about what working conditions are like, Dr. Amastae says “One thing you are not going to see is a 19th century sweatshop. That’s because it doesn’t exist.” Again, no other viewpoints are heard. At this point in the story, it would seem reasonable to interview a Mexican maquila worker or union organizer. In fact, at no point in any of the segments is the issue of labor unions brought up. One would think that in a story about workers’ conditions, the union perspective would be relevant. Unfortunately, labor union voices are absent throughout the series.

Another issue that is central to the topic of maquilas and job flight is the role of international trade agreements such as NAFTA. This topic is barely touched upon and is basically brushed aside with another quote from Dr. Amastae. “NAFTA ratified what was already happening and greased the wheels to make it happen more quickly” Dr. Amastae says. Again, no other voices are provided. This is in spite of the fact that numerous labor unions, human rights groups, environmental organizations, and other non-governmental organizations have taken public stands in opposition to trade policies like NAFTA. Information critical of NAFTA is easily obtainable from groups such as America’s Program, Maquiladora Health and Safety Support Network, or Mexican Free Trade Action Network.

Other than Dr. Amastae, the only other voices offering any sort of contextual data are an unidentified white male and Michigan governor Jennifer Granholm. The unnamed white male “expert” explains job loss in West Michigan by blaming not trade policy or corporate profit seeking, but rather the consumers. “Competition dictates what industry has to do and that is ultimately born by the consumer, who makes the purchase decision” says the mystery “expert.” Governor Granholm frames the issue as one of Michigan workers versus Mexican workers, “it is a ruthless game of global competition we are in, and as it stands right now we are giving points to the other team.” The reporter follows this quote by noting “points that create opportunity, a future and a reason to pray.”

An honest report might argue that low paying jobs with limited benefits, no unions, and very limited safety and environmental standards create more opportunity for American corporations than it does for Mexican workers. The fact that the series does not focus on the trade policies and those who benefited from them – investors and corporations – is the major flaw of the series. By framing the story on a few Mexican workers rather than providing a substantive discussion of NAFTA, these reports do nothing to inform viewers as to why jobs from Michigan are going to Mexico. Nor do these segments provide any outlet for the viewer to do anything other than throw their arms up and say, “there is nothing I can do.”

If you would like to voice your displeasure with WZZM and their “Michigan to Mexico” series, you can contact the news department at [email protected] or reporter Chris Tye at [email protected]. For any questions about this media alert contact the Grand Rapids Institute for Information Democracy.

Coca-Cola: Executives Get Bonuses, Death Threats for Workers in Colombia

Last year Coca-Cola paid $8.4 million in bonuses to its top six executives, despite laying-off 3,700 employees during the year. Those 3,700 employees constituted 7% of Coca-Cola’s workforce and some have questioned the decision to pay bonuses to executives while dismissing many workers. Such questions seem especially relevant in light of Coca-Cola’s record revenues and earnings in 2003.

Coca-Cola is a corporation notorious for mistreatment and abuse of workers abroad, so it should not come as any surprise that the corporation is more concerned with compensating executives than retaining jobs. Coca-Cola continues to hire paramilitaries to suppress union organizing in Colombia, with recent acts of repression leading to a hunger strike that began on March 15th.

More Information:

US funds Opposition in Venezuela

Now that the U.S. government has succeeded in subverting democracy in Haiti, they can go back to their continuing effort of subverting democracy in Venezuela. Since he came into power, the US has been determined to get Hugo Chavez removed, despite the fact that he is the democratically elected leader of Venezuela. Documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act reveal that, in 2002, the US paid out more than a million dollars to opposition political groups in Venezuela. This funding has been made by the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) a non-profit agency financed entirely by Congress. It distributes $40m ($22m) a year to various groups in what it says is an effort to strengthen democracy. In Venezuela, the NED channeled the money to three of its four main operational “wings”: the international arms of the Republican and Democratic parties – the International Republican Institute and the National Democratic Institute for International Affairs respectively – and the foreign policy wing of the AFL-CIO union, the American Center for International Labor Solidarity.

If the NED exists to “strengthen democracy,” then why would it support the opposition forces that staged a coup against Chavez in 2002? Historically, the role of the NED has not been, as it claims, to support deomocracy, but rather it works to promote neo-liberal economic policies. Chavez’s crime, in the eyes of Washington, is not being anti-democratic but rather being anti-neo-liberal. As Chavez himself says “I consider myself a humanist, and a humanist has to be anti-neo-liberal.” As to Chavez’s opinion of George W. Bush, the unelected leader that is funding Venezuela’s opposition groups, Chavez referred to him quite understandably as an “asshole.”

For more information on events in Venezuela, check out the Venezuela Watch section on Z-net.

Students Against Sweatshops’ “Mini-Truth Tour” Targets Taco Bell

Activists from Students Against Sweatshops GVSU (SAS-GVSU) visited six Taco Bell locations in West Michigan today to hand out information and draw attention to the ongoing campaign and boycott against Taco Bell initiated by the Coalition of Immokalee Workers (CIW). Today’s actions were organized in solidarity with the CIW’s 2004 Truth Tour during which workers from Immokalee, Florida travelled to Taco Bell’s world headquarters in Irvine, California. Along the way, the CIW Truth Tour stopped at a number of college campuses working on the Boot the Bell campaign and visited Taco Bell restaurants, in addition to visiting Taco Bell’s parent company, YUM! Brands, in Louisville, Kentucky.

Taco Bell is the target of a three-year boycott initiated by the CIW in order to force Taco Bell to pay more for tomatoes grown in Florida. As a major buyer of Florida tomatoes, Taco Bell can use its economic and financial power to demand better working conditions in Florida’s tomato fields. Farmworkers who pick for Florida growers who sell tomatoes to Taco Bell earn between 40-50 cents for every 32-lb bucket of tomatoes they pick. Taco Bell could nearly double the picking piece rate paid to farmworkers by agreeing to pay just one penny more per pound for the tomatoes it buys from Florida growers.

SAS-GVSU is supporting the boycott by working to have Taco Bell removed from the Grand Valley State University’s Allendale campus and replaced with a restaurant that offers similar priced food. The group is currently distributing information about the treatment of tomato pickers in Immokalee and collecting signatures on a petition that calls for Taco Bell’s removal from campus. SAS-GVSU is the most well-known activist group on campus and the campaign is a frequent subject of articles and letters in GVSU’s student newspaper.

More Information:

People’s Alliance Anti-Corporate Globalization Campaign for March – CAFTA

Over the last year Michigan has lost more manufacturing jobs than any other state in the union. Many of these jobs have been moved by corporations from Michigan to “free trade zones” in Mexico. Because of the impact on workers in Michigan, there is increasing public awareness of NAFTA, the trade agreement most responsible for this job flight. Unfortunately, while awareness of NAFTA is at an all time high in West Michigan, there has been very little media coverage of CAFTA, the Central America Free Trade Agreement.

CAFTA, as the name implies, would expand NAFTA style trade regulations over most of Latin America. It already has been signed by trade representatives from El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua, Guatemala, the U.S. and later Costa Rica at the end of January. But, the fight against CAFTA is far from over. In order for CAFTA to become official it must be approved- along with all necessary implementing legislation by the National Assemblies (Congress) of each participating country.

Despite tremendous popular opposition to the agreement in Central America at present, it seems clear that stopping CAFTA will have to happen in the United States Congress. Members of Congress are hearing a lot these days from their constituents about the negative impact of “free” trade. Now more than ever it is critical to tell your congressperson to say No to CAFTA.

Talking Points on CAFTA From the Quixote Center (Quest for Peace):

  • Transparency: This agreement is being negotiated with little or no input from civil society. Indeed, many members of congress will not have heard about it, and those that have will not have seen any of the text of the agreement. Ask your member of congress if they are concerned by this secrecy and if they are willing to make a statement about it.
  • Labor Rights: One of the biggest concerns with this agreement is that it will lead to the weakening of labor rights enforcement in Central America and further erode labor in the United States as well.
  • Agriculture: One of the greatest concerns about CAFTA is the effect that it will have on the agricultural sector in Central America. The history of the North American Free Trade is a good guide for possible effects in Central America.
  • Expansive Corporate Privilege: The North American Free Trade Agreement established the right for companies to sue governments over public-interest laws that may limit their profits. In NAFTA, this is in “Chapter 11,” and has been employed 27 times by companies since 1994.
  • Undermining Public Services: For ten years public services in Central America have been under attack from many sources. Another concern with CAFTA is that it will establish investor rules that will make it impossible for governments in Central America (and the U.S.) to give preferences to public providers for services. There is widespread opposition to the further privatization of energy services, water services, health and education throughout Central America

More information and Factsheets:

What you can do:

Update on the Situation in Haiti

On Tuesday, lawyers for exiled Haitian president Jean-Bertrand Aristide served papers to Secretary of State Collin Powell and Attorney General John Ashcroft asking that the US prosecute the “kidnapping” committed as “part of a coup d’etat organized and implemented by officials of the government of the United States of America to remove and replace the democratically elected president of Haiti.”

The mainstream media’s coverage of Haiti has been deplorable, and while a recent article in the Christian Science Monitor does actually raise the prospect of a US backed coup without immediately dismissing the possibility, the article is an exception in the company of awful coverage. With the media’s growing willingness to adopt official government positions without questioning them, the independent media continues to provide the only critical perspectives. Democracy Now was able to conduct a relatively lengthy interview with Aristide on his removal from Haiti and Z Net has a new essay from Noam Chomsky providing background on the situation in Hati in addition to a new section on “Haiti Watch” section on Z Net with updates on Haiti.

Blame the Workers, but Still Lovin’ Rich

It seems that for the past several months now we’ve heard frequent announcements that local companies are laying off workers. In some instances, like the Electrolux plant in Greenville, these jobs are heading to Mexico. So it was with great anticipation that my coworker at GRIID, Tom Schwallie, and I looked forward to the WZZM 13 news series called “From Michigan to Mexico,” that aired in early March. This was a 4 – part story done by reporter Chris Tye as he spent several days in the city of Juarez, Mexico.

So here is my analysis of channel 13′s series.it was a complete joke, with little information on why jobs are leaving Michigan and relocating in Mexico. Everyone we have shown the 4 – part series to has shaken their head in disgust. The series is heavy on emotionalism, personalizing the realities of NAFTA, but without ever explaining the real impact of NAFTA. Viewers who caught the series were treated to comments from “experts” that claim the job flight is due to the “need for companies to stay competitive, ” and “consumer” demand low prices.

The news series missed a huge opportunity to help West Michigan residents understand that NAFTA was not a trade agreement, rather an investor’s rights agreement. The Institute for Policy Studies has been tracking the impact of NAFTA for ten years, check out their website. What WZZM 13 attempted to do was to pit workers against workers. Even asking the question to workers in Mexico how they felt about taking jobs from folks in Greenville is a misleading question. Workers in both the US and Mexico have had no say in trade policies such as NAFTA, asking workers south of the border implies they have some control over such trade policies. In the end channel 13′s “From Michigan to Mexico” series justifies the so-called trade policies like NAFTA, thus keeping corporations safe from further public scrutiny.

This is sad on many levels. First, local broadcast news outlets are not using the public airwaves to inform citizens. Instead they are misinforming us and distracting us with banal programming that keeps us in the dark. Secondly, it blames the public for economic policies, instead of corporations and the capitalist system, which is inherently anti-worker and anti-democratic. Lastly, the news coverage tends to report on the effects of these trade policies as an afterthought, rather than providing information to the community so we could take a more active role in forming public policy. This is particularly important now, since the US Congress is getting ready to vote on another trade policy that will extend NAFTA to all of Central America.

So what is CAFTA (Central America Free Trade Agreement) you say? Unless you are tied into the alternative press, it?s not likely that you will have heard about it. Here is a summary of what will happen if CAFTA goes through. CAFTA will privatize more public services, increase corporate power, erode democracy, destroy agriculture and small farmers, and weaken laws that would protect workers and the environment. Go to www.stopcafta.org for more information and efforts throughout North and Central America.

Locally in Grand Rapids, some of us are working on this issue, since Congress will be voting sometime in late April or early May. The local campaign hopes to educate people about the impacts of NAFTA/CAFTA, engage in some direct action to challenge the corporate pillage of these trade policies, and to build solidarity amongst workers and families who have been affected. Go to the CAFTA campaign at the Media Mouse website for more details locally.

As a side note, some of you may have seen the GR Press article on March 1 entitled “Elite Company.” It was an article about a new book by Pat Williams, the VP of operations for the Orlando Magic basketball team. Rich DeVos owns the Magic and is the subject of the book by Williams. The book basically says that DeVos, like Jesus, is a great communicator. That’s right Rich is now being compared to Jesus. In fact, the GR Press story ran 3 photos, one of Jesus, Michael Jordan and DeVos. The DeVos photo was 4 times as big as the one of Jesus and Jordan.

Well, we heard that DeVos and Williams were going to be at Schuler Books a few days after the article appeared. Not wanting to pass up the opportunity to visit with the man who is on a par with JESUS, we paid him a visit.

Rich and company were signing books in the back, so a friend of mine and I got in line to have books signed. The wait in line itself was sort of surreal, especially since we could hear the people in front of us falling at Rich?s feet. My partner in this little intervention grabbed a copy of Robbing Us Blind: The return of the Bush gang and the corporate mugging of America. Rich signed away, but afterwards noticed the title and asked “so what is this book about?” The response was how corporations are hurting American families. Rich was a bit perplexed at this point. Then I stepped up and handed him a bible. He said, “you want me to sign your bible?” I said why not and as he was signing it I asked how he felt about the Press article, being compared to Jesus and having a bigger photo than the son of god. He said he wasn’t sure and at about that time his very large bodyguard grabbed my arm and said “that’s enough!”

Jeff Smith works with a media watchdog called GRIID. If you want to see the autographed bible from Rich DeVos, I put it back on the shelf.