Category Archives: News

Support the Troops?

With Memorial Day here we are sure to hear the mantra “support the troops” repeatedly in the mainstream press. This, of course, is problematic to those who are opposed to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. First, there is the obvious question of what does “support the troops” even mean? If one pays taxes, then they are supporting the troops, whether they want to or not. The reality is that the slogan “support the troops” is a semantic trick used by those who are trying to justify war. Their rational is that one must support the war if they “support the troops”, that is, since American lives are at stake, we all must support the war effort or be “unpatriotic”. What is missing from this line of reasoning is the obvious fact that the people in power are the ones putting the troop sat risk in the first place by starting an unnecessary war. Given their definition of what “supporting the troops” entails, then it follows that the antiwar movement cannot “support the troops”.

One hundred years ago Mark Twain wrote “The War Prayer”. It seems as relevent now as it was a century ago.

It was a time of great exulting and excitement. The country was up in arms, the war was on, in every breast burned the holy fire of patriotism; the drums were beating, the bands playing, the toy pistols popping, the bunched firecrackers hissing and sputtering; on every hand and far down the receding and fading spread of roofs and balconies a fluttering wilderness of flags flashed in the sun; daily the young volunteers marched down the wide avenue gay and fine in their new uniforms, the proud fathers and mothers and sisters and sweethearts cheering them with voices choked with happy emotion as they swung by; nightly the packed mass meetings listened, panting, to patriot oratory which stirred the deepest depths of their hearts, and which they interrupted at briefest intervals with cyclones of applause, the tears running down their cheeks the while; in the churches the pastors preached devotion to flag and country, and invoked the God of Battles, beseeching His aid in our good cause in outpourings of fervid eloquence which moved every listener. It was indeed a glad and gracious time, and the half dozen rash spirits that ventured to disapprove of the war and cast doubt upon its righteousness straight way got such a stern and angry warning that for their personal safety’s sake they quickly shrank out of sight and offended no more in that way.

Sunday morning came — next day the battalions would leave for the front; the church was filled; the volunteers were there, their young faces alight with martial dreams — visions of the stern advance, the gathering momentum, the rushing charge, the flashing sabers, the flight of the foe, the tumult, the enveloping smoke, the fierce pursuit, the surrender! — then home from the war, bronzed heroes, welcomed, adored, submerged in golden seas of glory! With the volunteers sat their dear ones, proud, happy, and envied by the neighbors and friends who had no sons and brothers to send forth to the field of honor, there to win for the flag, or failing, die the noblest of noble deaths. The service proceeded; a war chapter from the Old Testament was read; the first prayer was said; it was followed by an organ burst that shook the building, and with one impulse the house rose, with glowing eyes and beating hearts, and poured out that tremendous invocation:

“God the all-terrible! Thou who ordainest, Thunder thy clarion and lightning thy sword!”

Then came the “long” prayer. None could remember the like of it for passionate pleading and moving and beautiful language. The burden of its supplication was, that an ever-merciful and benignant Father of us all would watch over our noble young soldiers, and aid, comfort, and encourage them in their patriotic work; bless them, shield them in the day of battle and the hour of peril, bear them in His mighty hand, make them strong and confident, invincible in the bloody onset; help them to crush the foe, grant to them and to their flag and country imperishable honor and glory — An aged stranger entered and moved with slow and noiseless step up the main aisle, his eyes fixed upon the minister, his long body clothed in a robe that reached to his feet, his head bare, his white hair descending in a frothy cataract to his shoulders, his seamy face unnaturally pale, pale even to ghastliness. With all eyes following and wondering, he made his silent way; without pausing, he ascended to the preacher’s side and stood there, waiting. With shut lids the preacher, unconscious of his presence, continued his moving prayer, and at last finished it with the words, uttered in fervent appeal, “Bless our arms, grant us victory, O Lord our God, Father and Protector of our land and flag!”

The stranger touched his arm, motioned him to step aside — which the startled minister did — and took his place. During some moments he surveyed the spellbound audience with solemn eyes, in which burned an uncanny light; then in a deep voice he said:

“I come from the Throne — bearing a message from Almighty God!” The words smote the house with a shock; if the stranger perceived it he gave no attention. “He has heard the prayer of His servant your shepherd, and will grant it if such be your desire after I, His messenger, shall have explained to you its import — that is to say, its full import. For it is like unto many of the prayers of men, in that it asks for more than he who utters it is aware of — except he pause and think.

“God’s servant and yours has prayed his prayer. Has he paused and taken thought? Is it one prayer? No, it is two — one uttered, the other not. Both have reached the ear of Him Who heareth all supplications, the spoken and the unspoken. Ponder this — keep it in mind. If you would beseech a blessing upon yourself, beware! lest without intent you invoke a curse upon a neighbor at the same time. If you pray for the blessing of rain upon your crop which needs it, by that act you are possibly praying for a curse upon some neighbor’s crop which may not need rain and can be injured by it.

“You have heard your servant’s prayer — the uttered part of it. I am commissioned of God to put into words the other part of it — that part which the pastor — and also you in your hearts — fervently prayed silently. And ignorantly and unthinkingly — God grant that it was so! You heard these words: ‘Grant us victory, O Lord our God!’ That is sufficient. The whole of the uttered prayer is compact into those pregnant words. Elaborations were not necessary. When you have prayed for victory you have prayed for many unmentioned results which follow victory — must follow it, cannot help but follow it. Upon the listening spirit of God the Father fell also the unspoken part of the prayer. He commandeth me to put it into words. Listen!

“O Lord our Father, our young patriots, idols of our hearts, go forth to battle — be Thou near them! With them — in spirit — we also go forth from the sweet peace of our beloved firesides to smite the foe. O Lord our God, help us to tear their soldiers to bloody shreds with our shells; help us to cover their smiling fields with the pale forms of their patriot dead; help us to drown the thunder of the guns with shrieks of their wounded, writhing in pain; help us to lay waste their humble homes with hurricanes of fire; help us to wring the hearts of their unoffending widows with unavailing grief; help us to turn them out roofless with their little children to wander unfriended the wastes of their desolated land in rags and hunger and thirst, sports of the sun flames of summer and the icy winds of winter, broken in spirit, worn with travail, imploring Thee for the refuge of the grave and denied it — for our sakes who adore Thee, Lord, blast their hopes, blight their lives, protract their bitter pilgrimage, make heavy their steps, water their way with tears, stain the white snow with the blood of their wounded feet! We ask it, in the spirit of love, of Him Who is the Source of Love, and Who is the ever-faithful refuge and friend of all that are sore beset and seek His aid with humble and contrite hearts. Amen.”

[After a pause.] “Ye have prayed it; if ye still desire it, speak! The messenger of the Most High waits.”

It was believed afterward that the man was a lunatic, because there was no sense in what he said

Thoughts on Memorial Day

Today is the day in which Americans supposedly honor U.S. soldiers who have died in various wars. It would seem appropriate therefore to consider the words of the decorated soldier in U.S. history, USMC Major General Smedley Butler.

Excerpt from a speech delivered in 1933, by Major General Smedley Butler, USMC

War is just a racket. A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of people. Only a small inside group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few at the expense of the masses.

I believe in adequate defense at the coastline and nothing else. If a nation comes over here to fight, then we’ll fight. The trouble with America is that when the dollar only earns 6 percent over here, then it gets restless and goes overseas to get 100 percent. Then the flag follows the dollar and the soldiers follow the flag.

I wouldn’t go to war again as I have done to protect some lousy investment of the bankers. There are only two things we should fight for. One is the defense of our homes and the other is the Bill of Rights. War for any other reason is simply a racket.

There isn’t a trick in the racketeering bag that the military gang is blind to. It has its “finger men” to point out enemies, its “muscle men” to destroy enemies, its “brain men” to plan war preparations, and a “Big Boss” Super-Nationalistic-Capitalism.

It may seem odd for me, a military man to adopt such a comparison. Truthfulness compels me to. I spent thirty-three years and four months in active military service as a member of this country’s most agile military force, the Marine Corps. I served in all commissioned ranks from Second Lieutenant to Major-General. And during that period, I spent most of my time being a high class muscle- man for Big Business, for Wall Street and for the Bankers. In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism.

I suspected I was just part of a racket at the time. Now I am sure of it. Like all the members of the military profession, I never had a thought of my own until I left the service. My mental faculties remained in suspended animation while I obeyed the orders of higher-ups. This is typical with everyone in the military service.

I helped make Mexico, especially Tampico, safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in. I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefits of Wall Street. The record of racketeering is long. I helped purify Nicaragua for the international banking house of Brown Brothers in 1909-1912 (where have I heard that name before?). I brought light to the Dominican Republic for American sugar interests in 1916. In China I helped to see to it that Standard Oil went its way unmolested.

During those years, I had, as the boys in the back room would say, a swell racket. Looking back on it, I feel that I could have given Al Capone a few hints. The best he could do was to operate his racket in three districts. I operated on three continents.

Iraq Watch: Bush Addresses Nation, Media Coverage, War Profiteering

President George W. Bush Addresses the Nation on Iraq

On Monday, President Bush gave the first in a series of speeches building towards the United States “transfer of power” in Iraq. Reaction to the speech has been quite negative around the world, and not just in “the usual places” like Al-Jazeera (Bush Iraq plan offers ‘nothing new’) but also in large US-based corporate publications such as The Washington Post (A Speech Meant to Rally Public Support Doesn’t Answer Key Questions).

Of course, this is not that surprising given that Bush continues to believe the US troops in Iraq are there to “to defend our [the United States] security, not to stay as an occupying power” and that the only way to ensure a “free Iraq” is to continue the occupation of Iraq, whether that be in its current, blatant form with the Coalition Provisional Authority or in its presumed post-June 30 de facto form. It is also worth noting that Bush still believes that the various Iraqi resistance forces are “seeking the return of tyranny and the death of democracy” and refuses to acknowledge the fact that the presence of an occupying force is providing the main impetus for the resistance.

On a related note, author Rahul Mahajan, who is in Iraq, has provided some analysis of the proposed United Nations resolution on the “transfer of authority”, demonstrating that in affect provides a legal mandate for a continuing occupation by a multi-national force.

Some analysis of the speech:

President Bush’s May 24 Speech on Iraq: A Critique

Alternet: Bush Speech Widens the Reality Gap

Media on Iraq

In a surprising move, the New York Times actually issued an apology for its coverage of Iraq’s supposed WMD’s during the lead-up to the war. Not surprisingly, the statement was buried in the back pages and did not mention any specific reporters, such as the oft-criticized Judith Miller. The Times places the blame for their faulty reporting squarely on former Bush administration favorite Ahmad Chalabi. Interestingly, while Chalabi’s credibility as an intelligence source has been known to be very suspect for some time, the Times waited to blame him until after he fell from grace with Bush.

Some analysis of the NYTimes retraction:

CounterPunch: Modified Come Down at the New York Time

Common Dreams: ‘The New York Times,’ in Editors’ Note, Finds Much to Fault in its Iraq WMD Coverage

While the mainstream press continues to focus on the Abu Graib prison abuse scandal, rightwing radio hosts Rush Limbaugh and Michael Savage have repeatedly tried to downplay or justify the abuse visited upon the Iraqi detainees. Both of these ideologues are given 15 hours a week of airtime on AM 1300 here in Grand Rapids.

As the situation in Iraq deteriorates, even some of the Neo-cons are having second thoughts. Richard Pearle, referred to in Washington circles as the “Prince of Darkness,” recently said that the occupation of Iraq was “a grave error.” Perle, one of the architects of the war and a member of the neo-conservative think-tank, Project for a New American Century, is among a growing number of conservatives becoming critical of the war.

War Profiteering

CorporateWatch and Global Exchange have released a new study on the largest benefactor of the invasion of Iraq, Halliburton. Thus far, Halliburton has received $18 billion in contracts to rebuild Iraq’s oil industry and to provide various other services to the United States military. The report’s release was timed to coincide with Halliburton’s annual shareholders meeting, which was met by protests.

Here in Grand Rapids, the annual World Trade Week featured a “Focus on Iraq” panel looking at ways in which companies can profit from the invasion of Iraq. The session featured Rick Ortiz, a Senior International Trade Specialist with the US Department of Commerce and Fouad K. Alnajjar of F&F Group. If reports from the local corporate media are any indication of the content of the session, nothing was mentioned about the ethics of profiting from an illegal invasion.

In related local news, it turns out that Betsy DeVos, chairperson of the Michigan State Republican Party, has a connection to war profiteering in Iraq. Her brother, Erik D. Prince, is the founder of Blackwater USA, a company providing private mercenary forces to the United States military for use in Iraq.

Protests/Direct Action

In Boston, activists protested the torture of Iraqi prisoners at Abu Ghraib prison in Baghdad, holding a protest outside of the local Armed Forces Recruiting Center in which a person stood dressed with a cloak over their body, recalling the famous photo from Abu Ghraib. One student was arrested and is being charged with felonies.

In New York City activists staged a “die-in” in Rockfeller Center outside NBC Studios. Not surprisingly, the Today Show ignored the event, but the New York Independent Media Center has produced a short video documenting the die-in. Activists in New York City are concerned that the overwhelming police presence and the use of “protest pens” to limit the visibility of the protest are signs of how the NYPD will limit dissent at the upcoming Republican National Convention.

In Brighton, United Kingdom a direct action using an elaborate blockade shut down EDO MBM Technology, a company manufacturing bomb and missile components for military aircraft.

Critical Mass Takes the Streets of Grand Rapids

About 25 cyclists took over the streets of downtown Grand Rapids today during the monthly Critical Mass bike ride. The ride lasted a little less than two hours and went through downtown and Eastown before ending at Veterans Park. Critical Mass rides have been occuring on the last Friday of the month since June of 2000.

The next ride is June 25. Participants meet at Veterans Park between 5:15 and 5:30 and leave sometime shortly after that. Veterans Park is located at the corner of Fulton and Sheldon.

Grand Rapids Critical Mass

Media Mouse Launches Iraq Watch

Media Mouse has launched a new section of the site called Iraq Watch. Iraq Watch is a weekly news update providing a synopsis of news in Iraq, with a major focus being stories ignored by the corporate media. In addition to placing the updates online, Media Mouse plans to send them to local corporate media outlets as a way of improving the local media’s dismal coverage of Iraq.

On a related note, the UN has announced their choice for Iraq’s first post-Saddam Prime Minister, Iyad Allawi. According to NPR, Allawi has a history of corruption and is a member of Chalabi’s Iraqi National Congress.

FCC License Renewals and Media Reform

This summer all the radio stations in Michigan must get their FCC license renewed. The following summer all the Michigan TV stations must get their FCC licenses renewed. In the past, this has usually been little more than a rubber-stamping process; a paperwork exercise in which radio stations legal commitment to serve the public interest was seldom really considered. The emergence of a Nation-wide media reform movement is hoping to change that by challenging radio station license renewals on the grass roots level. To further this goal, the Grand Rapids Institute for Information Democracy (GRIID) has created an easy-to-use guide to the radio and TV license renewal process. This guide looks at why activists should care about FCC license renewals, conducting local TV and radio surveys in your media market, how to lodge a motion not to renewal to the FCC, and most importantly, how to use the license renewal process as an organizing tool.

GRIID has also recently finished two other studies, one looking at hypersexual content on Grand Rapids area radio, the other being an evaluation of local news coverage of the US war in Iraq in 2004. Also available from GRIID and its parent organization, the Grand Rapids Community Media Center, is a video and DVD of Amy Goodman’s recent lecture at Fountain Street Church. To obtain a copy, contact GRIID.

U.S. House votes to limit troops to 500

In a defeat for President George W. Bush, the U.S. House of Representatives voted May 20 to limit U.S. military personnel in Colombia to 500 and U.S. contractors there to 400. A 2000 law set 400-person caps on both military personnel and contractors. The Bush administration has requested that Congress raise the caps to 800 and 600, respectively. And Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-California), the bill’s sponsor, proposed eliminating the caps. The numbers approved by the House stem from an amendment by Rep. Gene Taylor (D-Missisippi) in the House Armed Services Committee. In the Senate, a bill granting the Bush request reached the floor May 21 but lawmakers took no action before recessing until June 1. The Bush administration says the additions are vital for President Alvaro Uribe Vélez’s counterinsurgency programs, including a three-year southern offensive dubbed the “Patriot Plan” that Washington helped design. In a May 14 memorandum, the Washington Office on Latin America warned that the plan “signals the entrance of the U.S. into a new, more intense phase of military involvement in Colombia’s internal armed conflict, and underscores the potential for escalation beyond the mission understood by Congress and beyond the appetite of the American public.” JO

Planning Meeting for Upcoming Bush and Kerry Visits

Local activists have called for a public meeting to plan for upcoming visits by President George W. Bush and Democratic nominee John Kerry. The meeting will take place on June 8 at 7:00pm in Ah-Nab-Awen park (downtown Grand Rapids in front of the Gerald R. Ford Museum).

Text from the meeting flyer:

Whether one is enraged by the Bush Administration’s policies or John Kerry’s limited opposition, upcoming visits by either presidential candidate must be confronted. Based on past experiences, these events are often announced with limited notice, and consequently, planning should begin now so that plans can be implemented on short notice. There are a number of responses to these visits–demonstrations, creative forms of resistance (street theatre, guerilla art, radical cheerleading), direct action, and many others.

This meeting is open to people coming from a variety of different perspectives and skill-levels. Those participating in the meeting should come prepared to respect differing opinions and acknowledge that a diversity of tactics can be utilized in responding to these visits. While we cannot possibly agree on every detail, we strive to organize in an inclusive manner that facilitates connections between people with similar goals and interests and organize a larger framework for the protests that provides opportunities for people to participate in a variety of ways.

View the flyer for the meeting

New York Time Apologizes (sort of) for WMD Coverage

Today the New York Times published an editorial admitting that it’s coverage of Iraq and WMD’s during the lead up to the invasion of Iraq was flawed. In their own words:

We have found a number of instances of coverage that was not as rigorous as it should have been. In some cases, information that was controversial then, and seems questionable now, was insufficiently qualified or allowed to stand unchallenged. Looking back, we wish we had been more aggressive in re-examining the claims as new evidence emerged–or failed to emerge.

The Times prefaces this statement by first explaining how the majority of their war leadup reporting was accurate and that, in re-examining their coverage they “found an enormous amount of journalism that we are proud of.”

In most cases, what we reported was an accurate reflection of the state of our knowledge at the time, much of it painstakingly extracted from intelligence agencies that were themselves dependent on sketchy information.

The Times also has posted on their site a sampling of articles they published about the decisions that led the United States into the war in Iraq, and especially the issue of Iraq’s weapons. This sampling has fifteen articles that seem to be hyping Iraq’s WMD capabilities, of these, nine were written by Judith Miller. Judith Miller’s reporting has been extensively reviewed and commented on in the New York Review of Books, the Washington Post, Slate, and Counterpunch. The Times editorial mentions no journalists by name and deflects the issue of Judith Miller’s irresponsible reporting by saying:

Some critics of our coverage during that time have focused blame on individual reporters. Our examination, however, indicates that the problem was more complicated.

The most enlightening aspect of today’s Times editorial is not it’s content, which is as much a justification as an apology, but rather the timing of it. In its explanation of how it got duped into publishing faulty information, the Times squarely places the blame on Ahmad Chalabi and the INC. It is telling that while Chalabi has been discredited as a viable source of intelligence for months, the Times has not been willing to admit this until the same week that Chalabi has officially fallen out of favor with the Bush administration. It would seem that the New York Times has found a convenient scapegoat in the newly discredited Chalabi to excuse their culpability in selling the Iraq war to the American public.

State GOP Leader Betsy DeVos Delivers Speech in Grand Rapids

Betsy DeVos, chairperson of the Michigan Republican Party, delivered a speech at the party’s convention in Grand Rapids on Saturday (transcript). While she promised to reveal “some things … that aren’t usually said in polite conversation,” her main assertion, that “the political left and the Democrat Party in America have gone out of control” and has become “totally consumed by their hatred of our President,” was not particularly noteworthy–such an opinion has long been expressed by members of the GOP.

Perhaps the most unusual aspect of her speech was her statement that Michael Moore is “one of the leaders of the Democrats.” While DeVos called for “a return to civil discussion in this country,” Moore’s new film, Farenheit 9/11, was described as consisting of “vile attacks on President Bush.” These comments echo DeVos’ comments last time Moore visited Grand Rapids, when she accused Moore of “juvenile and incoherent leftism” rather than focusing on the substance of his criticism of George W. Bush. DeVos’ hatred of Moore is akin to that of the Democrats whom she accuses of fixating on Bush and reflects an unwillingness to engage critics of the Bush administration on a substantive level.