Category Archives: News

Noteworthy Articles

The following articles of interest were published elsewhere on the web today:

Previously archived links are available on Media Mouse’s del.icio.us page. To recommend links, tag them with “mediamouserecommended” on del.icio.us.

Seed Bill Likely to Emerge in House after Senate Bill Stalls

According to the coalition of small farmers, environmentalists, and consumers that successfully campaigned to stop a bill in the Michigan Senate that sought to limit the capacity of local municipalities to restrict the use of genetically modified seeds, the bill will likely reemerge in the state’s House of Representatives. Already, Republican representatives Neal Nitz and John Proos, both of whom are members of the House Agriculture Committee, are circulating a version of the Senate bill to recruit co-sponsors in an effort to pass a House version of the bill before drawing the public attention that effectively defeated the Senate bill.

The Michigan Senate bill (SB 777), sponsored by Republican Gerald Van Woerkom, would prevent local communities from enforcing an ordinance prohibiting or regulating the labeling, sale, storage, transportation, distribution, use, or planting of genetically modified seeds. According to reporting in the Michigan Citizen, Van Woerkom says that while large agribusiness corporations such as Monsanto would benefit the bill they are not behind it and that the impetus for the bill instead comes out of concerns for farmers who could benefit from the use of genetically modified seeds and questions about the abilities of local governments to regulate and evaluate genetically engineered crops. Van Woerkom has also claimed that he has the support of the Senate Agriculture Committee citing the working relationships he has with other Committee members and conversations that suggest only Democratic Senator Liz Brater opposes the bill. While Van Woerkom says that he did not introduce the bill on behalf of industry, it is worth noting that Van Woerkom receives extensive political contributions from industry political action committees (PACs), many of whom are among Michigan’s top PACs.

The legislation, which is being promoted in Michigan by the Farm Bureau, has likely come at the behest of industry despite Van Woerkom’s comments to the contrary. Across the United States, agri-business corporations and lobbying interests are supporting “preemption” bills as a way of preventing cities from restricting genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Industry has taken this course in response to citizen initiatives around the country that have sought to restrict GMOs, including successful initiatives involving three California counties and one-hundred New England towns that have GMOs. In 2005, seventeen states introduced legislation removing local control of plants and seeds and the common language between the bills has suggested a coordinated effort by industry. The effort is believed to have originated with the American Legislative Exchange Council, a lobbying group, where an industry proposal for a “biotechnology state uniformity resolution” was first discussed in May of 2004.

Aside from issues of local control and corporate involvement in the legislative process, the legislation is also opening old questions about the safety of genetically engineered foods. As has historically been the case, environmental and human concerns are being raised with activists pointing out that there has been little human study on the long-term safety of GMOs which frequently produce allergic or toxic effects in people. The allergy threat has been highlighted with by the accidental introduction of StarLink corn in 2000 that was subsequently pulled from stores due to allergy concerns. Moreover, there is no pre-market safety testing for GMO foods, a fact that has led campaigners to argue that restricting municipalities’ capacity to regulate GMOs undermines the so-called “precautionary principle” whereby thorough investigation of new technologies should be conducted before their adoption.

Particularly in Michigan, much of the opposition to GMOs has been in terms of their potential environmental concerns. Genetically modified crops can contaminate neighboring crops without providing any visual clues, a process which may have devastating effects on local ecosystems. This concern is particularly acute with experimental crops, which are frequently “field tested” in Michigan. The biotechnology industry began field testing in the 1980s as a way of determining the impact of new crops on the environment and how they function, but the USDA has failed to adequately regulate the tests leading to the introduction of nonnative organisms in ecosystems, soil damage, so-called genetic pollution, and the development of new viral strains in response to virus-resistant plants. In Michigan, some 750 open-air field tests of GMOs and biopharmaceuticals have been conducted. Since the introduction of field tests, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) has only rejected 3.6% of the total applications—a number that has caused critics to question the capability of the USDA to oversee such tests. These concerns gained additional validity last month when the USDA’s inspector general released a report finding that the agency has failed to properly oversee trials. The report was released shortly before the Center for Food Safety sued the USDA for its failure to adequately analyze the public health, environmental, and economic consequences of its release of genetically engineered alfalfa.

Questions of oversight, along with opposition from consumers, activists, university professors, and cities, are what ultimately caused the Senate bill to stall in committee. Already, activists are organizing against a similar bill in the House, beginning their effort before such a bill is introduced. As part of this effort, there is currently a letter writing campaign targeting the Michigan House Agriculture Committee.

Of Michigan’s 125 food crops, 90% of soy is genetically engineered, as is 32% of the corn crop. On the national level, 85% of soy and 45% of corn is genetically engineered while about 70% of processed foods are believed to contain genetically modified ingredients.

March Planned as Part of Local Effort to Fight Anti-immigrant Legislation

photo

Local immigrants and immigrants’ rights activists have announced plans for a march outside of the Gerald R. Ford Federal Building this Wednesday to highlight their opposition to the Border Protection, Antiterrorism, and Illegal Immigration Control Act of 2005 (HR 4437). The bill, passed in the House of Representatives in December of 2005, effectively criminalizes immigration by moving immigration violations from being a civil matter to a federal crime, criminalizes individuals and organizations assisting undocumented immigrants, gives local officials the power to enforce immigration law, and makes other changes to immigration policy.

The march is part of a national effort to fight HR 4437 and to prevent the passage of a similar bill in the Senate. Moreover, there has been considerable local organizing around the issue with forums and organizing meetings being held this month and last month, both of which have garnered considerable participation from the immigrant community. While local Congressman Vern Ehlers voted for HR 4437, organizers are urging people to write to Senators Debbie Stabenow and Carl Levin as the Senate will take up the bill on March 2nd.

For background information on the issue, the February 10, 2006 edition of Catalyst Radio featured a good overview of the legislation and local organizing efforts.

Ann Coulter Cancels Speech at Kent County GOP Dinner

According to reports on the Grand Rapids Press website and on WZZM 13, conservative political commentator Ann Coulter has cancelled her scheduled appearance at the Kent County Republican Party’s annual Lincoln Day Dinner. While Coulter has drawn attention nationally for recent racist comments towards Arabs, the Kent County Republican Party’s co-chair, Karl Hascall, defended Coulter’s comments:

Ann Coulter is an entertainer who does political commentary. She uses extreme statements to get her point across. I wouldn’t go around calling Arabs ragheads, but in certain contexts, such as comedy, that’s accepted.

With the cancellation of Coulter’s speech it is important to remember that Hascall’s statement essentially defends racism and is no more acceptable than those who previously defended blackface minstrel entertainment or use other pejoratives to describe people of other races. Hascall’s comments are particular troubling given the ongoing and pervasive racism towards Arabs in the media and US culture.

Book Reviews: Gone Tomorrow and How Nonviolence Strengthens the State

Reviews of Gone Tomorrow and How Nonviolence Strengthens the State have been added to the book reviews section of the site. Heather Rodgers’ Gone Tomorrow: The Hidden Life of Garbage is an intriguing look at the history of garbage, the corporatization of trash, its environmental consequences, and the history of consumerism in the United States. In Peter Gelderloos’ How Nonviolence Strengthens the State, Gelderloos provides a critique of nonviolence and looks at the ways in which nonviolence serves to aid the state. While the argument is not particularly well developed, it offers a number of insights that will hopefully lead to a more critical view of nonviolence.

Noteworthy Articles

The following articles of interest were published elsewhere on the web today:

Previously archived links are available on Media Mouse’s del.icio.us page. To recommend links, tag them with “mediamouserecommended” on del.icio.us.

Noteworthy Articles

The following articles of interest were published elsewhere on the web today:

Previously archived links are available on Media Mouse’s del.icio.us page. To recommend links, tag them with “mediamouserecommended” on del.icio.us.

Ann Coulter Speaks in Kalamazoo in Advance of Grand Rapids Appearance

On Wednesday, conservative political commentator Ann Coulter spoke in front of a crowd of more than 2,300 people at Western Michigan University in Kalamazoo. Coulter, who is speaking at a Kent County Republican dinner on March 16, has come under fire for the racist comments that she has made over the past few weeks. These comments have prompted Michigan Democratic Party Chair Mark Brewer to ask the Republican Party to cancel her appearance, to which Michigan Republican Party Co-Chair Karl Hascall responded by defending Coulter’s use of the term “raghead” as an acceptable comedic term. According to an article in the Kalamazoo Gazette, Coulter largely avoided racist terminology instead deciding to cobble together a number of one-line “zingers” into a speech. However, during the question and answer period, Coulter told an African-American man that she understood what it was like to be black in the United States. The comment was made in response to a question posed by an African-American audience member about how minorities could be drawn to the Republican Party, to which Coulter responded that “It’s very tough to be a conservative black. I know what you go through.”

Nationally, Ann Coulter’s syndicated weekly column again featured racist depictions of Muslims, whom she called “savages” as she decried the Bush administration’s “obstinate refusal to profile Middle Easterners.” In columns earlier this month, Coulter described Islam as “a car-burning cult” and used the term “jihad monkey.”

Noteworthy Articles

The following articles of interest were published elsewhere on the web today:

Previously archived links are available on Media Mouse’s del.icio.us page. To recommend links, tag them with “mediamouserecommended” on del.icio.us.

Performance Artist Gives Lecture on History of Hip-Hop and its Ongoing Socio-Political Relevance

On Tuesday, New York City-based performance artist Toyia Taylor gave a lecture at Grand Valley State University about the history and origins of hip-hop in the United States and the current state of hip-hop. The lecture, which was attended by over fifty students, many of whom identified themselves as “hip-hop heads,” was well received and resulted in a lengthy discussion about how hip-hop has strayed from its roots, how contemporary hip-hop has shifted both in terms of technique and subject matter, and how contemporary hip-hop can be reinvigorated as a means of moving away from the hyper commercialized state that it is in currently.

Taylor began with a historical overview of hip-hop, arguing that in order for people to improve the current state of hip-hop—which Taylor argued was absolutely necessary—that people needed to be familiar with its history. A show of hands solicited by Taylor revealed that few of the people attending the event were familiar with the history of hip-hop, revealing that if an audience of those most interested in the art form were not too familiar, that the majority of those considering themselves fans of hip-hop (especially of the commercial variety), likely are not. Taylor described how the origins of hip-hop can be traced to the decision to build the Cross Bronx Expressway (CBE) in 1953 and the demolishment of entire neighborhoods and displacement of some 60,000 residents in the Bronx. While numerous local businesses were closed and those who where able to leave, people that were generally of European descent and were able to take advantage of the $200 offered as compensation by the city, low-income African-Americans and people of Caribbean descent were housed in high-rise apartment projects located in traditionally white neighborhoods. As is generally expected in such situations, the white residents did not welcome the influx of displaced people of color and gangs formed due to assaults by whites and unemployment skyrocketed. The early gangs, bearing names such as the Ghetto Brothers, dominated the neighborhood for years until the gang leaders got together and initiated a plan to end the gang wars centering on an improvement of the community. Following a 1971 gang summit, the Ghetto Brothers, one of the largest gangs with over 1,000 members, started a Latin funk band and out of that emerged a movement of artists “spinning” records and doing call-and-response chants in the neighborhoods. The new art form, which was the origin of contemporary hip-hop, had its roots in giving a voice to people who were traditionally disenfranchised and whereas gangs used to run the streets neighborhoods came to be dominated by hip-hop “crews” that hosted street parties and developed the “four elements” of hip-hop—break dancing, djaying, rhyming, and graffiti—out of which modern hip-hop emerged.

For Taylor, contemporary hip-hop is in its current state due in large part to its commercialization and the role that large corporations such as Clear Channel play in governing radio airplay and the role of record labels in stifling innovation and how those two forces have exerted control over hip-hop. Taylor described how much of contemporary hip-hop, which she described as “pop-hop,” is produced solely with the intent to succeed commercially and gain airplay on corporate radio stations, some of which play so-called “hit” songs as many as sixteen times in one day. Taylor described how one of hip-hop’s early artists, Afrika Bambaattaa, had reservations about the recording of his music and concerns that the energy and feeling that it contained would be diminished when it became a packaged consumer good. This theme was touched on several times during the discussion when members of the audience described how many contemporary artists simply chose to adhere to a formula that they believe will sell records and eschew innovation and ignore the message that they are conveying. Many people raised the question of whether or not it was a case of corporations determining what people should hear or corporations responding to what consumers want, as the fact that many contemporary records, despite all of their problems, are still selling well. In supporting the notion that is a matter of corporations determining what people want to hear, multiple people raised the prospect that the popular hip-hop projects an image of African-Americans males as gangster “brutes” or uncivilized “others” that is satisfying to white audiences and can be used to justify ongoing racism. There was also some discussion about how conscious political hip-hop records (KRS-One, Public Enemy) used to sell and that while artists like Dead Prez, Mos Def, or Talib Kweli are not selling or receiving airplay it has more to do with corporations than a lack of interest in the music, as artists such as U2, who have always been a “conscious” band, sell millions of records.

To Taylor and those attending the lecture, it was clear that the discussion and the state of hip-hop is an incredibly important topic. Taylor described how hip-hop is not simply a form of music and that while there are some debates over whether or not it qualifies as a culture, it is important to the lives of millions of youth living in the United States for whom hip-hop provides a daily soundtrack to their lives and a form of ongoing communication. To that end, while much of contemporary commercial hip-hop may be stale sand easily dismissed, there are numerous efforts to reinvigorate hip-hop. Early hip-hop artist Afrika Bambaataa has made calls for those involved in hip-hop to organize against corporate radio’s promotion of violence and misogyny, while hip-hop journalist Davey D has been promoting independent hip-hop and integrating politics back into the music, organizations such as New York’s REACH have been organizing in their communities, and national events such as the National Hip-Hop Political Convention have taken place to promote “hip-hop activism” and social change via hip-hop.