Category Archives: News

Residents Discuss Solutions to Recent Violent Crime in Grand Rapids

Over the past month and a half, the Grand Rapids has seen an increase in violent crime, with police recording 31 shootings and 12 homicides so far this year. The increase in violent crime has brought considerable attention from the local corporate media, city officials, the religious community, and the police, all of whom have weighed in with solutions to the problem. Unfortunately, much of this dialog has been shaped by the media’s sensationalized coverage of the violence, coverage that largely portrays African-Americans in Grand Rapids as “out of control” and ignores the more systemic issues—poverty, broken public education system, and racism in Grand Rapids—and instead has chosen to simply emphasize the violence without discussing solutions. Similarly, the Grand Rapids Police Department, represented through media reports, has advocated for tougher policing as a solution to the crime, announcing that they will add a second mobile police station in the inner-city (Baxter and Diamond) and launching “Operation ALL-OUT” to increase the presence of police officers as a deterrent to crime. As the GRPD has increased its resolve to quash the violence through law enforcement, it has occasionally recognized that there are more systemic issues at hand, with Chief of Police Harry Dolan blaming the 52% dropout rate from high school or stating that “we can’t arrest our way out of this,” yet the GRPD has offered little beyond increased patrols and promises that they will be in the southeast side of Grand Rapids “indefinitely.”

As a counter to the discussion taking place in the media and by the police, a meeting was held Thursday night at the New Hope Baptist Church on Delaware to bring the Grand Rapids community together to address the root causes and solutions to the recent violence, which New Hope’s pastor said has put the city in a “state of crisis” over the past month. The meeting was setup as a free flowing dialog with small group sessions to discuss the problem, and in order to promote and honest and frank discussion of the situation in Grand Rapids, the media and police were barred from attending in order to encourage people to participate without fear of reprisal. In his opening remarks, Reverend Dean explained that the media was not allowed in order to prevent it from becoming a “dog and pony show” and to instead have a discussion that would lead to concrete results as “lives are in balance.” The meeting was attended by several elected officials including Grand Rapids City Commissioners Elias Lumpkins, Jim White, and Rosalyn Bliss, Kent County Commissioners Paul Mayhue and James Vaughn, along with Joan Bowman from the governor’s office. By way of a show of hands, several ministers were in attendance representing a variety of Christian and Muslim churches.

Following a brief outline of the meeting’s format, the audience was split into groups for small group discussion. The groups were given twenty minutes to discuss each of four questions pertaining to recent violence in Grand Rapids—what are the problems, what are the causes, what are the solutions, and how are we going to know when elected officials adequately responded to the concerns raised during the meeting. During these discussions, residents of the southeast side brought up a variety of reasons for the violence ranging from the influence of popular entertainment that glorifies violence to the absence of religion in the public schools. There was a general consensus that the violence was rooted in systemic causes, with many raising concerns about the realities of economic inequality in Grand Rapids, lack of equitable funding of public schools, a high incarceration rate that is a product of a punitive and biased judicial system that prevents felons from attaining jobs or voting and deprives families of their fathers. Other causes were also raised including a lack of discipline by parents, lack of respect of elders in the community, and a lack of respect towards the community. Among the solutions favored by attendees were incorporation of black history into school curriculum to foster a sense of pride in one’s community and culture, job programs, reform of the both the local judicial system and the national system, more community involvement in schools, the neighborhoods, and in the churches, and more activities for youth. It is also worth noting that while the meeting was predominately middle-aged or older, several youth did express the need for youth to included as part of the solution.

After the small group sessions, people developed a list of recommendations that will be included along with a summary of the meeting in a report to be presented at the next City Commission meeting. Among the ideas that the group agreed to present were:

  • A unified approach by the religious community to address the problem
  • The implementation of black history as a means of fostering a sense of empowerment and pride as part of the public education system

  • Rehabilitation programs in the prisons and jails
  • Apprenticeships and other programs in the inner-city aimed at youth

  • An end to separation by race and an effort to work towards a solution as a united community

Former Air Force Cadet Testifies Before House Sub-Committee on Sexual Assault Within the Air Force

Former Air Force Cadet Beth Davis testified in front of the Government Reform Subcommittee on National security Tuesday on her experience with sexual assault within the Air Force. Davis testified alongside Christine Hansen, executive director of the Miles Foundation, and Delilah Rumburg, executive director of the National Sexual Violence Resource Center.

A freshman in the Air Force Academy in 1999, Davis reported being raped and sexually assaulted five times during the course of the year. She described a “cohesive effort against [her]” from the chain of command “all the way to the Pentagon” after she filed charges against her assailant. Upon the recommendation of the Air Force?s legal offices, her case was closed after six months. Davis said that an appointment was set up for her to see an Air Force psychologist; at the appointment, the psychologist admitted that he had been told by an officer that he had to come up with an analysis that would have her removed from the Academy. She repeatedly stated that her entire career had been ruined. Her assailant, on the other hand, never faced any consequences for his actions; she stated that “[nothing] of substance has ever been done.”

Davis spoke on her experiences talking with other female cadets and cited data showing that her case was not an exception, but the norm. She spoke of a culture in which male cadets are aware that they can rape and sexually assault and get away with it. At one point in her testimony, Davis stated that every female cadet she knew in the Air Force Academy had been raped. Rep. Christopher Shays of Connecticut, head of the subcommittee, stopped her and asked her if she was certain of her statement, absolutely positive that every female cadet she knew had been raped. Davis responded that she was absolutely certain that the answer was yes. She also cited a Washington Post study which examined 56 claims of sexual assault within the Air Force. Of the 56, two were brought to trial, one of which was in a civilian rather than military court. In the rest of the cases, either a bargain was struck where the attacker would resign from the Air Force, or nothing happened. One subcommittee member remarked that the way sexual assault is handled is more like how cheating on a test than a violent crime, as the perpetrator, if caught, is kicked out of the institution rather than charged with a crime and sent to jail. Near the end of the hearing, Rep. Carolyn Maloney of New York summarized the testimony she had heard as follows: “Rapists get promotions and continue their careers. In some extreme cases, they are quietly dismissed. Rape victims get sent to a psychologist, have charges filed against them, and have their careers destroyed.”

Noteworthy Articles

The following articles of interest were published elsewhere on the web today:

Previously archived links are available on Media Mouse’s del.icio.us page. To recommend links, tag them with “mediamouserecommended” on del.icio.us.

Michigan Senator Stabenow Votes in Favor of Flag Burning Amendment

On Tuesday, the United States Senate voted down a constitutional amendment that would have banned the desecration of the United States flag. The amendment—long sought by conservatives and seen by some as a way for the Bush administration to regain favor with its conservative base—nearly passed, falling one vote short of being sent to the states for ratification. Had the amendment been sent to the states for ratification, it would have needed to be ratified by three-quarters of the states. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), who has lobbied heavily against the amendment, described Tuesday’s vote as “a victory for the First Amendment and all Americans who cherish the freedoms guaranteed in the Bill of Rights.”

The flag burning amendment, introduced by conservative Senator Orrin Hatch, simply stated, “The Congress shall have power to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the United States.” Republicans sought the passage of the amendment as a repudiation of Supreme Court rulings in 1989 and 1990 that determined that burning the flag and other desecrations were protected as free speech by the first amendment of the United States’ constitution. Senator Hatch explained his support of the amendment not only as a means of protecting “a unique symbol of our nationhood” but as a means of reigning in “activist judges” that are issuing rulings contrary to the desires of the citizens of the United States. Hatch further explained that the groups opposing the amendment were “radical special interest groups” who were working along with the media and the judges to prevent “the people” from having a flag burning amendment. Other Senators such as Bill Frist focused on the relationship between the proposed amendment and patriotism, explaining that those who have died “defending that flag” are deserving of the amendment as “a small humble act for us to defend it.” Despite the fact that the amendment was seen as an attempt to gain the support of conservatives, it attracted the votes of fourteen Democrats. In the final 66 to 34 vote, Michigan Senator Debbie Stabenow voted in favor of the amendment, reflecting her support of such an amendment during her two terms in the House of Representatives. Michigan Senator Carl Levin voted against the amendment.

Earlier this month, another measure long sought by conservatives and President Bush, a national ban on gay marriage, failed to move to a vote after Senators voted to close debate without a vote. The gay marriage ban failed to garner the support of either Michigan Senator’s Carl Levin and Debbie Stabenow. The amendment read, “Marriage in the United States shall consist of only the union of a man and a woman” and went on to state the constitution of no state will be allowed to define marriage as anything other than “the union of a man and a woman.” Senator Levin explained his opposition to the amendment by stating that “The Constitution has been amended in the past to broaden and affirm the rights of Americans and never to narrow the rights of a group of Americans” while Senator Stabenow expressed her personal belief that “marriage is a religious covenant between a man and a woman” and that “the legal aspects of marriage” should continue to be governed by the states. Despite the lack of support by Michigan’s Senators, Michigan banned gay marriage by a ballot initiative in the 2004 election. In a 2004 vote, Grand Rapids area Congressional representative Vern Ehlers voted in favor of a similar amendment. The House is expected to take up a gay marriage ban this summer, in what Human Rights Campaign President Joe Solmonese described as “election year posturing” to take up an amendment voted down twice by the Senate.

Voting Machines Susceptible to Electronic Attack

A new report by the non-partisan Brennan Center has found that the all three of the nation’s most commonly purchased electronic voting systems are vulnerable to software attacks. According to the report, software attacks could “threaten the integrity” of state and federal elections where the machines are used. The report, “The Machinery of Democracy: Protecting Elections in an Electronic World,” found that:

All of the most commonly purchased electronic voting systems have significant security and reliability vulnerabilities. All three systems are equally vulnerable to an attack involving the insertion of corrupt software or other software attack programs designed to take over a voting machine.

Automatic audits, done randomly and transparently, are necessary if paper records are to enhance security. The report called into question basic assumptions of many election officials by finding that the systems in 14 states using voter-verified paper records but doing so without requiring automatic audits are of “questionable security value.”

Wireless components on voting machines are particularly vulnerable to attack. The report finds that machines with wireless components could be attacked by “virtually any member of the public with some knowledge of software and a simple device with wireless capabilities, such as a PDA.”

The vast majority of states have not implemented election procedures or countermeasures to detect a software attack even though the most troubling vulnerabilities of each system can be substantially remedied.

The report was put together by the Center’s Task Force on Voting System Security. The task force consisted of government and private sector scientists, voting machine experts, and security professionals who examined the machines for over a year.

Deconstructing Prostitution Coverage in the Grand Rapids Press

The Grand Rapids Institute for Information Democracy (GRIID) has produced a new analysis of prostitution coverage in the Grand Rapids Press. GRIID’s analysis examines two recent press stories, “Violent Pimp Gets Long Look from Cops” and “Mom Seeks Hope in Hooker Death Probe,” published on June 8th and June 9th, respectively. Beginning with the two headlines, GRIID details a number of deficiencies and biases in the two stories, including the Press’s use of the term “violent” to modify the term “pimp” when the entire system of prostitution is founded on violence towards women who are being exploited. While the two articles focus on the actions of a man who is a former pimp, the articles use the term pimp only five times whereas the term prostitute is used a total of 18 times, effectively altering people’s perception of a crime that was committed against women and creating the impression that they were committed by people who have a status less than women and more as property. Such a view is further conveyed in the articles when the Press describes the killing of the two women as “a fate that befell some victims,” rather than recognizing that they were victims of systemic violence. GRIID also observes that the two articles were written from a law enforcement perspective rather than a public health perspective and consequently fails to take into account the complexities of sex trafficking.

For more information on prostitution in Grand Rapids and addressing the issue from a public health perspective, the Prostitution Round Table compiled a report in 2002 titled “We Can Do Better: Helping Prostituted Women and Girls in Grand Rapids Make Healthy Choices.”

Michigan Sulfide Mining Permit Process Stalled by Court Ruling

On Thursday of last week, Lansing Judge Paula J.M. Manderfield sent back Kennecott Eagle Minerals’ request for the state’s first sulfide mining permit to the Office of Administrative Hearings and Rulings. The ruling overturned a ruling made in May by administrative Judge Richard Lacasse who rejected a petition by the Keweenaw Bay Indian Community, four tribal members, the Huron Mountain Club, and the Yellow Dog Preserve Inc. who allegied that the permit application filed by Kennecott was incomplete and that the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) ruled in error when it determined that Kennecott’s application was “administratively complete.” Judge Manderfield further ordered that the hearing on the status of Kennecott’s application—which has not yet been scheduled—be heard by a different judge as Manderfield said that Lacasse created a conflict of interest in contacting the DEQ for advice on how to proceed with the petition filed by opponents of the mine.

The ruling last week prompted Save the Wild UP, a group organizing against the sulfide mine, to send out an email titled “We are Winning” in which Cynthia Pryor of the Yellow Dog Watershed Preserve stated that “the perception of ‘winning’ is in our favor.” Pryor’s email explained that until there is a new hearing on the contested permit, the application process is stayed and that Kennecott will not be able to commence mining. At this point, no judge has been appointed nor has a hearing date been chosen. The DEQ also submitted a letter to Kennecott outlining 91 areas where additional information is needed before a permit can be issued. The DEQ is seeking more information from Kennecott on a variety of issues including planned transportation routes, impact on endangered species, impact on groundwater, and mine crown stability.

Background information on sulfide mining in Michigan | Petition against sulfide mining

Noteworthy Articles

The following articles of interest were published elsewhere on the web today:

Previously archived links are available on Media Mouse’s del.icio.us page. To recommend links, tag them with “mediamouserecommended” on del.icio.us.

WOOD TV 8 Hypes Hoekstra’s Iraqi WMDs Claim

On June 21, 2006, WOOD TV 8 ran a story hyping claims made by Representative Peter Hoekstra of Holland that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction (WMD) prior to the invasion of Iraq. According to analysis posted on the Grand Rapids Institute for Information Democracy’s “Dissecting the Local News” site, WOOD TV 8 uncritically allowed Hoekstra to make the claim that the weapons, despite being from before 1991, were “still very, very dangerous.” GRIID takes WOOD TV 8 to task for not asking “the obvious questions of how dangerous are these two decade old shells, did they actually constitute a threat to the United States, and were they part of an ongoing WMD development program by Iraq.” GRIID’s analysis goes on to state that:

The station also plays various background footage while Hoekstra was speaking, much of it unrelated to the actual topic addressed. Footage of Ahmed Chalabi attending a meeting is shown, despite the fact that he has nothing to do with this particular story. Also, footage of US troops uncovering a box of munitions that appear to be conventional detonating caps, Iraqi’s pulling unidentified crates out of a hole in the ground, and a room full of unmarked metal barrels are shown. None of these images are actually are of these particular artillery shells and yet if a viewer is not paying close attention, it gives the impression that these are images of WMD’s being found. And no other voices or opinions are presented in this story, congressman Hoekstra is the only source used.

According to CIA weapons inspector Charles Duelfer, who headed the US mission to find WMD’s in Iraq and authored the Duelfer report; ‘the ones which have been found are left over from the Iran-Iraq war. They are almost 20 years old, and they are in a decayed fashion. It is very interesting that there are so many that were unaccounted for, but they do not constitute a weapon of mass destruction, although they could be a local hazard.’ He further said that ‘these do not indicate an ongoing weapons of mass destruction program as had been thought to exist before the war. These are leftover rounds, which Iraq probably did not even know that it had.’

Previous studies of the local media’s coverage of the Iraq War (2003, 2004, 2005) have found that the local media routinely reports the positions of official government or military sources uncritically.

Study Shows Michigan’s Carbon Dioxide Emissions Increased 46% from 1960 to 2001

A new report completed by the Public Interest Research Group has found that between 1960 and 2001, the United States’ emissions of carbon dioxide almost doubled with an increase of 95%. Not only has this been detrimental to the United States, but it has also affected the entire world with the United States now responsible for a staggering 25% of the world’s carbon dioxide emissions while refusing to participate in international treaties regulating such emissions. As such, global warming and climate change is a reality for the world, and if it continues unabated, will threaten the Earth’s human and non-human residents with sea level rise, heat waves, draught, more intense hurricanes, decreased crop yields, and water shortages. Rather than falling off as awareness increases about the environmental effects of global warming caused by carbon dioxide emissions, the 1990s saw an increase of 1.5% per year with emissions growing by 1.7% in 2004 making 2005 the warmest year on record as global warming pollution has “grown out of control” according to the report.

Statistics cited from 2001 in the report place Michigan within the top ten for states with the most carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel combustion, with Michigan ranking ninth in total emissions with 189.1 million metric tons. The 2001 numbers place Michigan in the top ten of states with the most emissions for all measured categories with the exception of oil, where Michigan ranked 11 out of 50. Thirty-one percent of the state’s emissions came from oil emissions as the state’s drivers have increased their miles traveled per year by 136% from 1960 to 2001, while the state’s coal emissions increased 21% since 1960. A recent study by the American Lung Association found that Michigan’s air quality rating was poor, suggesting that while emissions from carbon dioxide have increased at a rate lower than other states, air quality remains a serious concern in Michigan. The Great Lakes/Midwest region of which Michigan is a part had a 44% increase in emissions overall between 1960 and 2001, the smallest increase outside of the Northeast’s 12% increase. Of this increase, 40% was from coal emissions, 31% from oil emissions, and 29% from natural gas emissions.

While Michigan was not one of the twenty-eight states that doubled their carbon dioxide emissions over the study period, Michigan’s emissions are part of a disturbing national trend of increased emissions. Emissions have continued to grow due in large part to continued emissions from the electricity generation process and oil combustion used to power much of the United States’ transportation. Oil combustion alone accounted for 40% of the total increase in carbon dioxide emissions with the transportation sector increasing emissions by 150%. The continued reliance on coal power has also been responsible for nearly 40% of the emissions increases, with emissions from coal combustion for electricity generation increasing by 370%. Interestingly, emissions from industry have declined since 1966.

The report makes a series of broad recommendations calling for the reduction of emissions and reducing dependence on fossil fuels. To achieve these goals, the report urges the establishment of mandatory limits on emissions that will reduce emissions from today’s levels in 10 years, by 20% in 20 years, and by 80% by 2050. The report also urges that corporations and individuals work to reduce emissions by making homes and businesses more energy efficient, by purchasing and manufacturing more fuel-efficient vehicles, and by generating electricity from renewable sources. The report concludes that existing technology could substantially reduce global warming and that such technologies while making power plants more efficient, harnessing renewable energy sources such as wind, solar, geothermal, and biomass, and making cars more fuel efficient, would also lessen the United States dependence on oil, reduce air pollution, protect wilderness areas threatened by oil drilling and mining, and even save consumers money.