Category Archives: News

Pre-Campaign Gubernatorial Television Ad Spending Reaches $16.7 million

The gubernatorial campaigns of Democrat Jennifer Granholm and Republican Dick DeVos have spent a total of $16.7 million on television advertising through August 31. The Dick DeVos for Governor campaign has spent $12.8 million on advertising since mid-February, with DeVos being the source of 80% of his campaign funds. The Jennifer Granholm campaign spent $469,000 for a series of ads near the August primary and the Michigan Democratic State Central Committee has spent $3.5 million since early June. The Michigan Democratic Party ad campaign’s funding sources are undisclosed as they are running ads that define the two candidates but not making explicit references to the November election, thereby bypassing disclosure laws. Rich Robinson of the Michigan Campaign Finance Network, the group that conducted the research, describe the ad campaigns as “…dueling marketing campaigns of one exceptionally wealthy individual against anonymous persons and interest groups.”

In the Grand Rapids and Kalamazoo combined market, DeVos has spent $2,376,045 dollars while the Granholm campaign and the Michigan Democratic Party have spent $97,580 and $795,275.

Noteworthy Articles

The following articles of interest were published elsewhere on the web today:

Previously archived links are available on Media Mouse’s del.icio.us page. To recommend links, tag them with “mediamouserecommended” on del.icio.us.

Noteworthy Articles

The following articles of interest were published elsewhere on the web today:

Previously archived links are available on Media Mouse’s del.icio.us page. To recommend links, tag them with “mediamouserecommended” on del.icio.us.

Judge Refuses to Remove Michigan Civil Rights Initiative Ballot Proposal Despite Finding “Systematic Voter Fraud”

United States District Court Judge Arthur Tarnow ruled yesterday that the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative (MCRI) could stay on the November ballot. In a 34-page ruling, the court found that “the MCRI engaged in systematic voter fraud by telling voters that they were signing a petition supporting affirmative action,” but that because such deception was used to gain petition signatures from people of all races the fraud, while unacceptable, was not a violation of the Voters Rights Act. The ruling builds on the findings of the Michigan Civil Rights Commission earlier this summer that concluded that the MCRI campaign engaged in an “organized and widespread” pattern of misrepresentation to gather the signatures to place the MCRI on the ballot. The Michigan Civil Rights Commission report contained the testimony of hundreds of petition signers—including those testifying at a hearing in Grand Rapids—who said that they were told that the MCRI was designed to protect affirmative action in the state rather than to eliminate it.

The court declared that the conduct of the MCRI in gathering signatures was “unprincipled” and stated that should the MCRI pass, “it will be stained by well-documented acts of fraud and deception” that Tarnow contends were not credibly denied by MCRI organizers. This deception was systematic and went beyond “mere ‘puffery’ and was in fact fraudulent because it objectively misrepresented the purpose of the petition,” with both circulators and the public being misled as to the purpose of the petition and the MCRI. However, rather than using this as a basis to remove the MCRI from the ballot, Tarnow argues that the MCRI’s effort “targeted all Michigan voters for deception without regard to race,” and as a consequence, the Voting Rights Act does not apply because it prohibits only practices that result in unequal access to the political process because of race. Tarnow states that the issue of voter fraud should have been addressed by state institutions including the Michigan Courts, the Board of State Canvassers, the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, and the Bureau of Elections, all of whom “demonstrated an almost complete institutional indifference to the credible allegations of voter fraud.” The opinion states that citizens of Michigan should be concerned by the indifference of Michigan’s institutions and their failure to investigate the fraud.

In a press release, one of the organizations that has been fighting the MCRI and pushed the question of voter fraud to the forefront—By Any Means Necessary (BAMN)—objected to Tarnow’s decision not to issue an injunction to remove the initiative from the ballot despite his contention that “the evidence overwhelmingly favors a finding that MCRI defendants engaged in voter fraud.” BAMN argues that the only two investigations into the issue of voter fraud, one by the Michigan Civil Rights Commission and the District Court case, have both found widespread voter fraud, thereby suggesting that the MCRI should not be place on the ballot. Moreover, BAMN rejected Tarnow’s logic that because the fraudulent petition gathering effort did not target African-Americans exclusively; the Voting Rights Act does not apply. Shanta Driver, an attorney and national spokesperson for BAMN, said that “By that logic, all of the discriminatory schemes targeted at black voters in our nation’s history would still stand – the grand father clauses, poll taxes, and literacy tests which targeted black voters throughout the American South also deprived millions of white people of their right to vote. Judge Tarnow’s logic is that because white people were victims as well, there is no protection for anyone.” In light of what she termed as Tarnow’s “absurd” logic, she also stated that BAMN would be appealing the decision.

Michigan Organizations may Receive $13,765,000 in Earmarks; Van Andel Institute Earmark Raises Questions

Institutions and organizations in Michigan have received a proposed $13,765,000 in earmarks according to research from the non-profit Sunlight Foundation who earlier this month produced an interactive map allowing citizens to track proposed earmarks in the 2007 House of Representatives Department of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Bill (HR 5647). According to the Sunlight Foundation, a total of 1,867 earmarks worth more than half a billion tax dollars were attached to the bill as part of the appropriations process, with $650,000 going to projects in Grand Rapids. The bill contains three appropriations for organizations in Grand Rapids—$350,000 for Cherry Street Health Services, $200,000 for the Van Andel Institute, and St. Mary’s Health Care. According to the vague descriptions in the bill, the money is for “facilities and equipment” at Cherry Street Health Services, “the West Michigan Community Bio-Med/Molecular Cooperative” at the Van Andel Institute, and “an automated records system” for St. Mary’s Health Care.

The Sunlight Foundation decided to focus on the on the proposed Department of Labor/Health and Human Services Appropriations Bill (HR 5647) as it is representative of the problem that excessive earmarks have become since the mid-1990s, with earmarks rising from 3,055 in 1996 to 14,211 in 2004. An earmark is a line-item inserted in a bill to direct funds to a specific project or recipient and have long functioned as the primary means of inserting “pork” or excessive spending in bills as earmarks are most often used to fund preferred projects of individual legislators in their home districts or as a means of rewarding political backers. The earmarks are awarded without transparency, there are no Congressional debates on individual earmarks, they are listed anonymously in bills, and are often inserted in private committee meetings. Individual legislators insert earmarks into bills, often doing so at the behest of lobbyists and political supporters. As with most processes in Congress, senior Congress members and committee chairs hold the most power and consequently have the most individual earmarks. The Department of Labor Appropriations Bill is indicative of the problem that earmarks have become, as last year’s bill had no earmarks while this year’s has over 1,700 earmarks without any substantive disclosure. Since the start of the effort, citizen journalists and bloggers across the country have had success in uncovering information on the earmarks including earmarks for a lobbyist’s own foundation.

While a phone call to Grand Rapids area Representative Vern Ehlers was unsuccessful in determining if he secured the earmarks for the Grand Rapids organizations, as the Washington staffer that could answer the question is out of the office until September 5, one of the earmarks—for the Van Andel Institute—seems suspect due to Ehlers due to his connections to the late Jay Van Andel, his previous efforts to secure funding for federal funding for the Van Andel Institute, and the political contributions of the Van Andel Institute’s board. In the past three election cycles (2006, 2004, and 2003), members of the Van Andel Institute’s board have made political contributions to both Representative Vern Ehlers campaign as well as the Republican Party. The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Van Andel Institute’s Board of Trustees—David L. Van Andel—made a $15,000 contribution to the National Republican Congressional Committee in 2005, a $25,000 contribution to the National Republican Senatorial Committee in 2006, and $1,000 to President George W. Bush in 2003, while the Van Andel family contributed around $160,000 to Republicans over the past three election cycles. Chairman of the Board Ralph Haunstein has contributed $5,000 to Representative Ehlers in the past three election cycles—including $1,000 earlier this year—while supporting a variety of other Republicans. Peter C. Cook, a wealthy conservative in Grand Rapids and chairman on the Van Andel Institute’s Board of Trustees, contributed $1,000 to Representative Ehlers annually from 2003-2006 and contributed $10,000 to the National Republican Congressional Committee in 2002 and 2004 as part of a total of $100,000 in political contributions to Republican candidates, political action committees, and parties. In addition to contributions from members of the Van Andel Institute’s Board, Representative Ehlers secured $462,555 in federal funding earlier this year for the development of a lab connected to the Van Andel Institute. When Jay Van Andel passed away in 2004, Ehlers praised Van Andel for his faith, his donations to conservative institutions such as the Heritage Foundation and the United States Chamber of Commerce, his contributions to the Republican Party, and for the Van Andel Institute which he described as perhaps Van Andel’s “most lasting legacy,” which Ehlers expects to become “a world-class leader in medical and cancer research.” While still awaiting response from Ehlers office as to whether or not he secured the Grand Rapids earmarks in HR 5647, the interconnectedness between Representative Ehlers, the Van Andel Institute’s board, and the Republican Party, provides a worthy avenue for investigation and another example of how the wealthy and conservative right in West Michigan seeks to use its influence to shape political policy, as well as the need for more disclosure and transparency in the politics.

Noteworthy Articles

The following articles of interest were published elsewhere on the web today:

Previously archived links are available on Media Mouse’s del.icio.us page. To recommend links, tag them with “mediamouserecommended” on del.icio.us.

Court Ruling Strikes Down Evangelical Prison Ministry Program with Connections to the Religious Right in West Michigan

An evangelical Christian prison program that has been supported by several conservative West Michigan families active in the religious right—including Republican gubernatorial candidate Dick DeVos—was struck down as unconstitutional earlier this summer. The program at Iowa’s Newton Correctional Facility—called Inner Change and operated by Prison Fellowship Ministries, an evangelical ministry operated by convicted Watergate felon Chuck Colson—was judged to be in violation laws governing the use of state funding to support what the judge in the case termed “indoctrination of inmates into the Evangelical Christian belief system.” The ruling also may impact President George W. Bush’s “faith-based initiatives” programs, which are likely to face a variety of constitutional challenges in the coming years.

Inner Change began in 1999 with Iowa corrections officials first using $222,950 from its Inmate Telephone Rebate Fund to pay for the program (a surcharge levied on phone calls made by and to inmates to pay for prison programming) and then using money from the Healthy Iowans Tobacco Trust (partly composed of tax dollars) to pay for the program. The program eventually took over the prison’s “honor unit” where the best-behaved inmates were housed, with the inmates moved back into general population and two hundred inmates moving into the unit to be given religious instruction around the clock. The judge ruled that the program and “…the state has[had] literally established an Evangelical Christian congregation within the walls of one of its penal institutions, giving the leaders of that congregation, i.e., InnerChange employees, authority to control the spiritual, emotional, and physical lives of hundreds of Iowa inmates.” The lawsuit filed against the program did not take issue with religious programs in prisons, but focused on the fact that the program was funded with state money and promoted a conservative and biblically literalist form of Christianity. Inner Change staff members were required to sign Prison Fellowship’s fundamentalist “Statement of Principles” and inmates, if they wanted to participate in the program, were expected to adhere to Inner Change’s view of Christianity, with several inmates revealing in the trial that they were referred to as “unsaved,” “pagan,” or “of Satan” if they did not adopt Inner Change’s worldview. One Native American who joined the program and practiced Native American rituals was accused of “witchcraft.” While the program strongly advocated an Evangelical worldview, it also gave a series of special privileges to participants including private toilet facilities, extra family visits, and access to classes necessary to be considered for parole.

Colson’s Prison Fellowship Ministries is heavily funded by a variety of prominent conservative foundations based in West Michigan. The Holland-based DeWitt Families Conduit Foundation—funded by money from the Bil Mar slaughterhouse operations—contributed to $12,000 to the organization from 2002 to 2004 while the Cook Charitable Foundation, based in Grand Rapids and founded by Peter C. Cook, founder of Great Lakes Mazda, contributed $10,000 in 2003. However, it is two of the area’s wealthiest and most right-leaning families—the Grand Rapids area DeVos family and Holland’s Prince family—that have made the most substantial contributions to the organization. The Richard and Helen DeVos Foundation—established by Amway (Alticor) co-founder Richard DeVos—contributed $1,000,000 annually to the organization from 2002-2004. Additionally, the Dick and Betsy DeVos Foundation—established by Richard “Dick” DeVos, Junior (and Republican candidate for governor this year)—contributed $50,000 in 2002 and 2003 to Prison Fellowship Ministries. Holland’s Prince family—which made money in the auto parts industry—contributed $680,000 from 2001 through two family foundations, the Edgar and Elsa Prince Foundation ($30,000 in 2003, $50,000 in 2004, $50,000 in 2005) and the Freiheit Foundation—established by Erik Prince, brother of Betsy DeVos and founder of the security contractor Blackwater.

Chuck Colson is a former aide to President Nixon who served seven months in federal prison stemming from his role in the Watergate scandal for obstruction of justice, while also scheming to firebomb the “liberal” Brookings Institute and hiring union members to beat up anti-Vietnam War protestors. In the mid-1970s, he became a born-again Christian and wrote a best-selling book, Born Again, from which he used the book’s royalties to form Prison Fellowship Ministries in 1976. Prison Fellowship has a presence in the majority of prisons in the United States, in addition to an international presence in 88 countries. Prison Fellowship boasts that more than 150,000 prisoners participate in its Bible studies and seminars each year, while its newspaper is the most widely distributed prison newspaper in the United States. While Colson has received some attention for his advocacy of restorative justice, limiting the jailing of nonviolent offenders, and improving prison conditions, he is an evangelical Protestant Christian who has significant support from the religious right foundations and his programs, such as Prison Fellowship’s Inner Change project, are clearly evangelical with United States District Judge Robert W. Pratt ruling in the Inner Change case that the program is “overwhelmingly devotional in nature and intended to indoctrinate Inner Change inmates into the Evangelical Christian belief system.” Since the 1980s, Colson’s religious views have shifted to the right with attacks on the separation of church and state, public education, evolution, and reproductive rights while advocating that the government post religious creeds such as the Ten Commandments in its buildings. Colson also routinely attacks gay and lesbian and advocates a patriarchal view of family where men are the have the moral and political responsibility to be “leaders” of their families.

Colson, who has published multiple books, has also gained influence in the Christian right through his regular columns for Christianity Today and his daily radio column “Breakpoint” broadcast on 1,000 religious radio stations across the country. As a testament to his influence, Colson received the Templeton Prize in 1993, a million-dollar cash reward given annually to people who have done significant work to advance conservative Christianity. Colson has used his influence in the Christian right to promote increasingly extreme viewpoints over the past few years. In September of 2005 Colson linked Hurricane Katrina to the “war on terror” by arguing that “…he (God) allowed it and perhaps he allowed it to get our attention so that we don’t delude ourselves into thinking that all we have to do is put things back the way they were and life will be normal again.” Earlier this year, Colson blamed “illegal immigration” on abortion stating that “reason we must allow millions of illegal aliens in to fill these jobs is because we have murdered a generation that would otherwise be filling them: 40 million sacrificed since 1973 to the god of self-fulfillment.” Colson frequently links disparate issues such as abortion and immigration, routinely making assertions that link topics such as terrorism and gay marriage or terrorism and the United States’ alleged “moral decadence.”

Noteworthy Articles

The following articles of interest were published elsewhere on the web today:

Previously archived links are available on Media Mouse’s del.icio.us page. To recommend links, tag them with “mediamouserecommended” on del.icio.us.

Revised and Expanded Military Recruiting Opt-Out Information available online for High School Students

In advance of the beginning of the 2006-2007 school year at high schools in the Grand Rapids area, Media Mouse has revised and expanded its information on how students and their parents can “opt-out” from having their information released to military recruiters. Under the No Child Left Behind Act, unless parents “opt-out,” high schools are required to turn over “student directory information”—a somewhat ambiguous class of records that range from student names and phone numbers to email addresses—to military recruiters upon request or lose federal funding. While Media Mouse previously only maintained a form to generate opt-out letters for the Grand Rapids Public Schools (GRPS), information has now been compiled for other public high schools.

The policies at most area high schools meet the minimum standards of the No Child Let Behind Act with most schools making the school’s policy about “student directory information” and its release to military recruiters available in school handbooks. Such placement, while fulfilling the requirement that “the local educational agency or private school shall notify parents of the option to make a request” not to have their child’s information given to military recruiters, still fails to inform many parents of the option. To that end, activists with the Institute for Global Education (IGE)’s Military Service Dialog Committee attended orientation sessions at GRPS high schools last week in order to distribute “opt-out” forms and to inform parents and students of their options. Elsewhere across the United States, activists have encouraged schools to take more proactive approaches for informing parents including sending letters containing the information directly to parents or putting the opt-out information on mandatory student emergency cards. Some school districts have also given students—even if they are under 18—the ability to opt-out themselves while others have established “opt-in” policies where information is by default kept from recruiters unless students or parents indicate that they want the information released.

While “opt-out” policies have received considerable attention as part of the national “counter-recruitment” movement to challenge military recruiters, there are a variety of other ways in which the military gains access to high school students personal information. Aside from the omnipresence of recruiters within many high schools, the military also receives detailed information about students from the Armed Forces Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) test, a standardized test administered by over 14,000 schools around the country. The military aggressively promotes this test to school districts as a “free” career interest test which is then used by the military to obtain student information and to develop targeted recruitment pitches. With the ASVAB—which is offered at many area high schools—students do have the option not to take the test, or if they feel “forced” to take the test due to administrative pressure, students can use “Option 8” which prevents student information from being used for recruiting purposes. Student information is also released to the military when students take the PSAT test as students who indicate that they would like to release information to “educational institutions” are also giving authorization to have their information released to the military, despite the fact that this is not disclosed on the test.

Federal Judge Allows Enforcement of Grand Rapids’ Ordinance Regulating Nude Dancing

The corporate media reported today that United States District Court Judge Robert Bell ruled said in a preliminary hearing that the City of Grand Rapids can enforce its ordinance regulating nude dancing. The ordinance, which requires a minimal amount of clothing for dancers, keeps patrons six feet from dancers, and restricts operating hours, was allowed to go into effect because Judge Bell determined that a lawsuit filed by strip clubs challenging the ordinance did not have a “substantial likelihood of success.” Enforcement of the ordinance, passed back in April, had been delayed until Bell’s ruling as the City’s lawyers agreed to wait until for this preliminary hearing before enforcing the ordinance. As of 12:01am Saturday, the City can now begin enforcing the ordinance, although in the Grand Rapids Press Assistant City Attorney Catherine Mish said that whether or not it would be enforced tonight is “a question for Police Chief Harry Dolan.” Additional rulings on the strip clubs’ challenging the ordinance on constitutional grounds will be made on October 20, 2006 as Bell did not rule on the city’s request for dismissal of the lawsuits.

Showgirl Galleria—the proposed all-nude club in downtown Grand Rapids that in many ways triggered the ordinance—has still not opened in downtown despite initial plans to open in 2005. While the club did open temporarily as a sort of “publicity stunt” likely designed to gain media coverage, the Club has yet to open with nude dancing (a store selling “adult” merchandise is in operation) due in part to public and legal opposition. London was quoted in the media stating that his businesses (Showgirl Galleria and Sensations) will become “non sexually-oriented businesses” with dancers (London refers to them as “girls”) dressing in bikinis and covering their buttocks and breasts as of 12:01am Saturday. Other strip clubs—namely the Red Barn and Parkway Tropics—will be doing the same, with Parkway Tropics taping off a portion of their stage to keep dancers six feet from customers and requiring dancers to put on bikinis before approaching customers for tips. Of course, the fact that semi-nude dancing continues to be allowed means that more work remains to be done in combating the strip clubs and the negative consequences of pornography and the sex industry, with a considerable amount of work being left undone to confront the patriarchal aspects of such businesses instead of only confronting the moral aspects.