Category Archives: News

WOOD TV Runs Story Promoting Military Recruiting

Last Friday’s military recruiting protest was covered briefly on WOOD TV 8 as part of a longer story on military recruiting and the impact that the Iraq War has had on recruiting. However, as has been the case with local reporting on military recruiting over the past two years (see previous analysis of articles in the Grand Rapids Press, on FOX 17, on WZZM 13, and a half-hour special on WZZM 13), WOOD TV 8 ran a story that was essentially a two-minute long advertisement for the military that failed to seriously engage the issue military recruiting. Political reporter Rick Albin reported a military recruiter’s statements at face value without doing any independent verification or questioning the recruiter’s claims. A recent exploration of the Army’s use of public relations and the media by the Center for Media and Democracy found that the Army specifically targets the broadcast media to promote itself, designing a variety of visually “exciting” stories that appear to television producers.

The video of the story is republished below with overlays correcting the recruiter’s statements and identifying areas where the WOOD TV 8 reporter should have investigated further:

Bishop Explores War and Forgiveness & Non-violence at Aquinas

On Tuesday, January 30th Detroit Bishop Thomas Gumbleton spoke at Aquinas College on the theme of “Forgiveness & Non-violence.” A variety of groups were involved in hosting this event, particularly the Aquinas Campus Ministry and Pax Christi Michigan. Gumbleton centered his lecture on a call for people to “build peace” based on what he called the “pillars of love and justice.”

This was a follow up to last year’s lecture based on Pope John Paul II’s article on peace. As usual, Bishop Gumbleton pointed out many aspects of war and violence in the world, even the violence of unequal distribution of the world’s resources. He said that what the Christian community needed to do was to practice “Enemy Love.” He gave the example of Apartheid in South Africa and how brutal that policy was towards Black South Africans. He stated that Nelson Mandela’s participation in the violent wing of the African National Congress (ANC), the violent wing of the party, wanted to create chaos in the Apartheid system by using violence. Mandela went to prison for 27 years. It was in prison that Mandela had a conversion and began to believe that he had to work as hard for the freedom of the oppressor as the freedom of the oppressed. So Mandela came out of prison committed to non-violence, worked on reconciliation and became president. Gumbleton stated that South Africa is now at peace, but would not have been if the politics of the ANC continued. The speaker did not substantiate his claims with anything other than the autobiography of Mandela. If South Africa is at peace now why are so many people, particularly Black South Africans, living in poverty? Gumbleton did not mention that Mandela embraced the neo-liberal economic model in South Africa, which many critics believe is worse now than during the Apartheid years.

The Bishop then gave the example of the recent murder in Amish community in Pennsylvania. The response by the Amish was to comfort the widow of the murderer. The Amish community is a Christian community that has maintained a commitment to the non-violence that Jesus lived, according to Gumbleton. “This is what all of us are called to if we are Christians.” He discussed the example of Jesus in further detail and then said that the Church has instead “adopted the Just War theory for the past 1600 years” that has attempted to provide a theological justification for war rather than adopting the non-violence epitomized in the life of Jesus Christ. He explained that Just War Theology occupies a tenuous place in contemporary society, as the nature of war has changed so drastically that war now means total destruction. Gumbleton cited prominent military scholar James Keegan to back up his assertion that warfare has changed dramatically since World War II, with it now being “total war.” Gumbleton cited the example of Winston Churchill’s campaign in Hamburg against civilians, the bombing of Dresden, the US fire bombing of Tokyo, and Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which he calls perhaps “the worst acts of terrorism ever.”

Gumbleton then moved to more recent examples and spoke of the devastation wrought in Iraq from the first Gulf War, the US imposed economic sanctions, and the current US occupation of Iraq. Gumbleton cited Pope John Paul II’s writing following the Gulf War and his call for war “never again” as a proper response to a war that has destroyed Iraq’s infrastructure, killed tens of thousands of civilians, and displaced over a million people. He talked about the types of weapons the US military uses and their devastation, specifically focusing on depleted uranium munitions. Depleted uranium is a bi-product of the nuclear process and is used in bullets, tank armor, and shells and spreads radiation on impact. It is because of the depleted uranium that “56% of all cancer in Iraq is amongst children under the age of 5,” that cancer rates have risen 300-400% in Iraq since the Gulf War, and that there has been a dramatic increase in the number of children born with severe birth defects. Gumbleton explained that he had visited Iraq numerous times, both to visit children injured or dying as a direct or indirect result of the United States’ military operations and as part of a delegation with members of the 9/11 group Families for a Peaceful Tomorrow. He described how that delegation met with the Iraqi families affected by the war and the way in which that experienced affected both groups.

Despite the good information about the consequences of war, the speaker did not address any tactics or strategies to combat war and militarism other than through pleas that the audience should reject war. During the question and answer period there were some questions posed about the cases of genocide in Darfur and Rawanda — could non-violence work in those cases? Gumbleton thought it was possible, but not without great loss and it would take time. He mentioned the example of the Christian Peacemaker Teams in place like Palestine who are trying to put themselves in the midst of conflict to deter violence, but even this oversimplifies a conflict like that. Not everyone can and will do that kind of work, but people could challenge US policy that funds the Israeli occupation of Palestinian land. There were several groups involved in anti-war work at this event, but there was not a conscious effort to state clearly what those groups were working on to end the war in Iraq or other anti-war efforts. The only organizing effort mentioned by Gumbleton was the campaign to establish a United States Department of Peace. Such a department, proposed by Ohio Congressional Representative Dennis Kucinich would provide a “counter” to the Defense Department (formerly called the Department of War) and would engage in activities such as teaching nonviolence to children, rehabilitation of prison populations, and build peacemaking between conflicting cultures. However, Gumbleton made no mention how people could get involved in that movement, meaning that his talk essentially told people to oppose war but gave no clear strategies as to how that should be done.

Noteworthy Articles

The following articles of interest were published elsewhere on the web today:

Previously archived links are available on Media Mouse’s del.icio.us page. To recommend links, tag them with “mediamouserecommended” on del.icio.us.

Protestors Challenge Military Recruiting

On Friday, twenty-five people attended a protest organized by ACTIVATE against military recruiting and the ongoing occupation of Iraq (video and photos are also available). The protest took place at the Armed Forces Career Center at Celebration Cinema and was the third and largest protest held against military recruiting in Grand Rapids. The protest was held in conjunction with the antiwar demonstration taking place in Washington DC on January 27, with the protestors calling for an end to the occupation of Iraq and opposing President George W. Bush’s planned escalation of the Iraq War.

ACTIVATE targeted the military recruiting station for its protest on the 26th because it provided a direct connection to the war in Iraq and the military’s capacity to maintain the occupation. The group held a variety signs highlighting facts about military recruiting and the human costs of the Iraq War. Thus far, the war has killed 655,000 Iraqi civilians and more than 3,000 troops. Additionally, organizing against military recruiting–through these protests and organizing high school students–could play an important role in ending the occupation of Iraq. In recent years, recruiters have failed to meet recruiting goals and pressure has increased on recruiters to meet their monthly goals. Military recruiters have also come under fire for a 50% increase in abuses in 2005, abuses that have ranged from coaching recruits to cheat on drug tests to widespread sexual misconduct with potential recruits. Antiwar activists can increase that pressure by denying them the recruits that the military needs to maintain the occupation. A number of people involved in the antiwar movement, including former Special Forces soldier Stan Goff, have argued that counter-recruitment should be a priority for the movement.

The recruiters initially positioned themselves at the front of the recruiting center and blocked the doors to the building while pounding on drums and chanting “Stop Enlisting, Start Resisting.” Two different recruiters came out and told the group that they could not block the doors, but the group refused to move. When it became clear that the recruiters had moved into the back of the building, the group moved to the backdoors and continued chanting and drumming in an attempt to disrupt the activities of the recruiters inside. At one point, the protestors opened one of the unlocked doors and disrupted an interaction between a recruiter and what appeared to be a potential recruit. The police eventually came and told the protestors that they could not block the doors or enter the building, but explained that they were otherwise free to continue protesting. When the police left, the group again moved to the front and distributed more flyers to pedestrians outside of the movie theatre. The group then chose to move to the back of the recruiting station again, chanting and pounding on the windows to disrupt the recruiters who were on the phone. Throughout the protest, the recruiters were very aggressive, repeatedly opening doors and slamming them into protestors, while responses from the public tended to be favorable. The police eventually returned to the scene and informed the protestors that they could not play drums, citing complaints from other businesses. Following the second visit from the police, the group decided to leave shortly after most of the police did.

The group is planning additional events and protests against the occupation of Iraq as part of a campaign designed to increase the visibility and effectiveness of antiwar movement in Grand Rapids. The campaign is part of a response by ACTIVATE to a nationwide call to action that the group signed onto back in December of 2006. The call challenges the antiwar movement to critically examine its failures and to move forward by “taking risks, making demands, and creating consequences” as well as making connections and doing the critical organizing work that has often been neglected by the movement.

Book Review: Digital Destiny: New Media and the Future of Democracy

Media Mouse has posted a review of Jeff Chester’s Digital Destiny: New Media and the Future of Democracy in the book reviews section of the site. In Digital Destiny, Chester provides one of the first serious analyses of the 1996 Telecommunications Act and how it set the stage for current media ownership battles. Chester explores who the major players in crafting the 1996 Telecom Act and how it was the product of a market-driven, bi-partisan effort.

Wangari Maathai at Fountain Street Church

“Every one of us needs ten trees to take care of the carbon dioxide we breathe out. We should know where our ten trees are. Or, are you using somebody else’s trees?” Wangari Maathai

2004 Nobel Peace Prize laureate, Wangari Maathai opened her lecture with observations on the biblical creation story as told in the book of Genesis. She noted that every day, after making another aspect of the environment, the creator commented, “It is good,” except for the last day, the day humanity was created. “We have convinced ourselves we are more important than the rest of creation,” Maathai said. “But, we cannot live without trees. They can live without us.”

Maathai believes that because we have higher intelligence, we have a moral responsibility to ensure that other species survive. She applied that belief in Kenya, where as a young biologist she was studying the tic’s role in East Coast Fever, a fatal epidemic killing hybrid cattle. Her fieldwork led her to observe that Kenya’s environment had been degraded. Because of deforestation upstream, fertile topsoil was filling the rivers as silt; rainwaters were washing away into lakes and the ocean instead of returning to groundwater reservoirs; and, rivers were beginning to dry up.

“This was much more dangerous than the tics,” she said.

Then, in 1975, her work with the National Council of Women of Kenya opened her eyes to the serious issues facing Kenya’s women: they did not have enough wood for household energy; they did not have clean drinking water; they did not have nutritious food; they had no ways to generate income. Maathai’s solution “Let us plant trees.”

“We went to the foresters and asked, ‘Can you teach us how to plant trees?’ This is difficult when the people are illiterate and a professional tried to teach you. To cut a long story short, we teach ourselves, use our common sense, our woman sense. Forget the foresters. We started teaching ourselves how to grow trees.”

Much of Kenya had been clear-cut; the British had introduced pines and eucalyptus that drank too much water and dried out the land. “We wanted to restore indigenous vegetation, biodiversity. It’s a campaign we are till carrying out,” she shared.

Maathai encouraged groups of women to plant trees “whichever way.” The women collected native seeds, planted them in all sorts of cast-off containers and nurtured the seedlings till transplanting them. The women earned money for each seedling planted, generating income for themselves. The new forests help provide wood for energy and stifle the erosion that has robbed farms of topsoil and rivers of clean water. The women taught other women how to be “Foresters without Diplomas.” Today, Kenya has more than 7,000 tree nurseries run by these women.

Though more than 30 million trees have been planted in Kenya, Maathai’s work is not done. When she began in the ’70s, 30% of Kenya was covered by forests. Only 2% is today. However, her work with the women became a catalyst for another change. As the women empowered themselves, and the people found their voices, many spoke out against Kenya’s dictatorial regime.

“If you do not live in a society that is democratic, that allows a minority voice to be heard, it is difficult to protect the environment,” Maathai said. “The freedom of movement. The freedom of assembly. The freedom of expression. The freedom of the press. You have all these freedoms. In a society like yours, you take for granted. When you are at their (the government’s) mercy, they are very pleasant. When you are free, you become troublesome.”

“To cut a long story short,” Kenya became a democracy in 2002; Maathai serves in parliament and as Assistant Minister for the Environment. But, she does not advise people to wait on their governments to take care of the environment.

“We can plant trees. Anybody can dig a hole. Plant a tree in that hole. Water it. Make sure it survives,” she said. “The government is the custodian of the environment. If the custodian is not doing his job, you fire him during elections.”

Today in Kenya, Maathai has undertaken a campaign to reduce the proliferation of plastic bags and packaging that is polluting Kenya’s cities, impacting its wildlife and creating an untold number of breeding puddles for malaria-infected mosquitoes. She is also working with the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) as Goodwill Ambassador for the Congo Basin Forest Ecosystem project–the goal, to plant one billion trees. She invited the audience to visit the Web site and get involved in the project. The Conga Forest, Amazon Forest and the South East Asian Forest are an important defense against the climate change that impacts all of us.

“It is the rich nations who really have to understand that, although the resources look like a lot around you, they are coming from people who are impoverished,” Maathai said. “Sooner or later, there will be conflict and it will affect us.”

Video from Friday’s Military Recruiting / Antiwar Protest

Media Mouse has put together a short video from Friday’s military recruiting protest at the Armed Forces Career Center in the Celebration Cinema complex. Around 25 people attended the protest organized by the group ACTIVATE and it was the largest and most energetic of the three protests held in Grand Rapids to publicly challenge military recruiters. The protest was one of two events organized to coincide with the nationwide antiwar mobilizations in Washington DC, with a second protest organized by the West Michigan Justice and Peace Coalition on Saturday afternoon that was attended by an estimated 40-50 people. For more information on military recruiting, consult Media Mouse’s counter-recruitment resources

Commentary: Popcorn and Propaganda: Movies, Militarism and Mad Mel

Jeff Smith’s column for the February issue of Recoil, “Popcorn and Propaganda: Movies, Militarism and Mad Mel” has been posted in the commentary section of the site. In it, Smith explores how the movie industry promotes militarism:

In the past month like many good Americans I went to the movie theater. I love film…the power it can have in telling stories. Movies also have a tremendous capacity to influence the public and shape our individuals perceive themselves and the world around them. Global empires certainly understand this, which is why the Nazi’s used film as a major propaganda tool.

The US has also produced it’s own films, especially during wartime, with the intent of shaping public opinion. The “Why We Fight” series was a very successful campaign by the Department of War, which is now called the Department of Defense. Hollywood has also played a significant role in promoting the “righteousness of America.” While Hollywood is independent of the US government it has had a special relationship with the US military and State Department, both to have access to the military hardware in film production and to support the US global image by allowing the Pentagon to approve scripts with military themes. This symbiotic relationship is well documented in Carl Boggs’ new book The Hollywood War Machine: US Militarism and Popular Culture.

Read “Popcorn and Propaganda: Movies, Militarism and Mad Mel”

Popcorn and Propaganda: Movies, Militarism and Mad Mel

by Jeff Smith

In the past month like many good Americans I went to the movie theater. I love film…the power it can have in telling stories. Movies also have a tremendous capacity to influence the public and shape our individuals perceive themselves and the world around them. Global empires certainly understand this, which is why the Nazi’s used film as a major propaganda tool.

The US has also produced it’s own films, especially during wartime, with the intent of shaping public opinion. The “Why We Fight” series was a very successful campaign by the Department of War, which is now called the Department of Defense. Hollywood has also played a significant role in promoting the “righteousness of America.” While Hollywood is independent of the US government it has had a special relationship with the US military and State Department, both to have access to the military hardware in film production and to support the US global image by allowing the Pentagon to approve scripts with military themes. This symbiotic relationship is well documented in Carl Boggs’ new book The Hollywood War Machine: US Militarism and Popular Culture.

Boggs states that there have been several key themes that US films have embraced and promoted in respect to US militarism: 1) that US military forces are driven by noble ends, 2) that enemy forces are routinely shown as primitive & barbaric, 3) that US forces inevitably triumph, 4) US enlisted men are always shown as belonging to a well-organized national military structure, 5) the US has supreme technology, 6) despite its horrors, war crosses the screen as an exhilarating human activity, 7) Hollywood turns war into a media spectacle, 8) militarism is associated to heroism, and 9) patriotism is central to military films. In the end, as media critical Douglas Kellner states, “US military films demonstrate who has power and who is powerless, who is allowed to exercise force and violence, and who is not.” It is with this statement in mind that I wanted to reflect on two movies I saw recently, The Good Shepherd and Apocalypto.

The Good Shepherd dealt with an insider’s perspective of the CIA, from the time of it’s formation to the failed Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba. Matt Damon’s character represents sort of a tragic figure who is highly gifted and seems to have a constant struggle over what he is participating in. The film communicates that this life in the CIA has destroyed his family relations and has even isolated him from the larger community. While I can appreciate the attempt to put a human face on the CIA, the film is in many ways to vague about the role it has played in global affairs since WWII. The film’s one bright spot is that is does show fairly accurately how the CIA grew out of the Office of Strategic Services in WWII and even recruited former Nazi officers to assist them in the Cold War. This recruitment of former Nazi’s is best documented by Christopher Simpson’s book Blowback: America’s Recruitment of Nazis and Its Effects on the Cold War. The film does show some of the negative consequences and tactics used by the CIA, but it’s too vague and never makes clear that the CIA was just a reflection of the larger foreign policy of the US during the Cold War. I would recommend the film as a tool to prompt discussion about a US government agency that has overthrown democratically elected governments, participated in torture, assassination and undermined social movements throughout the world.

Mel Gibson’s new bloodfest, Apocalypto, is a much more insidious and dangerous film. At its core Apocalypto is about how the Mayan culture prior to the European Conquest was so vicious and barbaric, that it not only was inevitable that they would be conquered, but it was better for the Mayans to have the opportunity to be “civilized” by the Europeans. The film goes out of its way to paint most Mayans as bloodthirsty and vengeful. Several characters revel in the suffering of others, but the pinnacle of absurdity was the pyramid scenes with human sacrifice.

Gibson went out of his way to manufacture what he thought Mayan high culture was like with most people appearing as obedient, superstitious and willing participants in the bloodletting. The human sacrifice scene has overzealous priests removing the hearts of one victim after another and then decapitating them until miraculously a solar eclipse occurs. The level of human sacrifice is affirmed later in the film when one Mayan who escapes his captures comes across a huge area filled with decapitated bodies, a scene that would remind most people of the Cambodian killing fields or the Nazi death camps.

What is particularly insidious about Gibson’s bloody epic is that this portrayal is nothing but pure propaganda. No competent scholar, historian or anthropologist can provide credible evidence that human sacrifice ever occurred, let alone on such a massive scale. Native Scholar Ward Churchill (Since Predator Came, 1995) demonstrates that the mass human sacrifice was part of the propaganda promoted by the Spanish Conqueror Cortez, a man who himself reveled in butchering and massacres, and Cortez was referring to the Aztecs, not Mayans. Historian Peter Hassler says the only concrete source of human sacrifice does come from the Mayas of Yucatan during the Spanish trials of 1561 through 1565. “These supposed testimonies about human sacrifice, however, were coerced from the Indians under torture and have been judged worthless as ethnographic evidence.”

What we do know from the writings of Bartalome de Las Casas (A Short Account of the Destruction of the Indies), a Dominican priest, is that the Europeans engaged in massive slaughter of the indigenous peoples of what is now southern Mexico and Central America. Gibson’s film ends with the Europeans making their way to the shores of Mesoamerica, but none of their bloodthirsty conquest is acknowledged in this miserable film. The danger of such of piece of cinema is not just that it distorts history, but plays a larger role in supporting current campaigns of cultural and political genocide in places like Guatemala, Chiapas and Oaxaca, Mexico. Gibson is tapping into the notion that western civilization and Christianity was the best thing for the Native people of the Americas…a lie that needs to be exposed and denounced loudly.

“More Troops, More Dollars” Report Examines Costs Iraq War for Grand Rapids, Michigan, and Beyond

A new report by the National Priorities Project titled “More Troops, More Dollars” provides examines the costs of the war in Iraq for local communities in the United States. With its release timed to coincide with President George W. Bush’s planned escalation of the war (which will cost taxpayers an additional $5.7 billion) and the antiwar demonstrations this weekend in Washington DC. The report takes the total $378 billion cost of the war–which was originally estimated to cost only $50 billion by Pentagon planners–and breaks the cost down based on city, state, and Congressional district. In addition to providing these estimates, it also highlights other costs of the war, including the long-term healthcare cost and disability benefits for wounded soldiers and interest payments on deficit spending, both of which are estimated to cost an additional $100 billion each.

The cost to the Michigan’s Third United States Congressional District, which is represented by Republican Vern Ehlers who has been a solid supporter of the war, is estimated at $571,397,054 based on the total cost to the state of Michigan ($10 billion) and the population and income levels of the Third District. To put this amount in perspective, the National Priorities Project explains that if the government valued human needs over militarism, that $571.4 million could have provided either healthcare for 122,040 children for the duration of the Iraq War, 4,544 affordable housing units, or 64 elementary schools. The report further places the cost to residents of Grand Rapids proper at $197.9 million. The war has also cost the state of Michigan in terms of lives taken by the war, with 118 soldiers from Michigan being killed in Iraq and 705 soldiers from Michigan being wounded.

The local Grand Rapids antiwar group ACTIVATE is organizing around the costs of the war, having recently announced its plans to obtain a Grand Rapids City Commission resolution opposing the war based on its costs. The effort builds off an attempt last year to pass a similar resolution by a group called the Cost of War Coalition, which despite turning out several groups and individuals to support a resolution, was not pursued by the City Commission. For individuals and organizations interested in working on the measure, contact ACTIVATE.