Category Archives: News

Area Radio Stations Promoting Misogynistic Content through their Websites

In 2004, the Grand Rapids Institute for Information Democracy (GRIID) published a study titled “Hyper-Sexual Content on Local Radio” that looked at sexual content on local radio stations with a particular focus on the websites of local radio stations. In light of Media Mouse’s examination WGRD DJ David Fox last year–who was recently fired–and that station’s prior promotion of contests at Tini Bikini’s, it is appropriate to look at the findings of the 2004 study by GRIID and see if improvements have made.

GRIID’s “Hyper-Sexual Content on Local Radio” study looked primarily at how the websites of many area radio stations make extensive use of hyper-sexual content to encourage people to visit the site. At the time the study was written, the authors indicated that they hoped that hearings on indecency in broadcasting and Federal Communications Commission (FCC) enforcement measures as well as radio licensing renewals would bring attention to the issue and change the content, although after reviewing the sites there has been little change since 2004. The stations still continue to promote hyper-sexual content that in turn encourages a patriarchal and misogynistic view of women that sees them primarily as objects existing solely for the fulfillment of male fantasy. With the exception of WGRD, the same stations identified in the 2004 study–WKLQ, WSNX, and WBFX–continue to feature objectifying portrayals of women and so-called “soft porn” images. Moreover, these images often have little to do with any of the music beyond appealing to a coveted young male demographic. This is especially clear with WOOD Radio’s “Beckett’s Babes” feature as the daily photos of women in bikinis has little to do with the stations predominately conservative talk format, which is similar to featuring of “Music Video Babes” on stations that do not even play the artists featured in the videos.

The websites of the radio stations reviewed tend to be heavily promoted although from our causal listening the hyper-sexual content on the pages tends not to be heavily promoted as a reason to visit the site. However, once one visits the site, such content is aggressively promoted and given prominent positioning on the websites. In addition, the content is often a component of a larger process of seeing women through a patriarchal or misogynistic lens, with the stations routinely holding events with women from Hooters to hosting wet t-shirt contests at area bars.

104.5 WSNX FM

The Clear Channel owned WSNX and its website at www.wsnx.com feature some of the most misogynistic content on local radio. A recent screen grab shows the way in which the site promotes hypersexual content on its front page, advertising pictures of Britney Spears’ nipple:

062907-wsnx-01.jpg

This type of content is promoted throughout the site. The Puddin’s Playhouse section contains a variety of misogynistic content including a video section billed as containing “sex tapes to the latest YouTube viral infection.” Among the videos featured were two different DJs receiving lap dances and actress Jessica Biel in her underwear:

062907-wsnx-02.jpg

Like the majority of the websites, WSNX has a “Babe of the Day” feature. The section features a photograph of a woman in a bikini each day, syndicated from Start Magazine, a publication that advertises itself with the slogan “We Don’t Even HAVE Articles:”

062907-wsnx-03.jpg

However, some of the most objectifying content comes from the “Freakshow,” a nightly program hosted by two DJs that go by “Big Mac” and “Hooch.” The two along with WSNX sponsor Monday night wet t-shirt and wet boxer contests at an area club and photos from those events are prominently displayed on their page. The sub-section also prominently features women from area clubs:

062907-wsnx-04.jpg

In addition, “the Freakshow” runs a contest for the hottest “MILF,” a popular term that refers to “Mom I’d Like to Freak.” The contest features area mothers that submit their photos and then have them judged by the visitors to the website:

062907-wsnx-05.jpg

The photo section for the “eob Show” features similar content to the “Freak Show” pictures, although with a focus more on celebrities. Among the photo albums available were “Another Britney nip slip,” “Christina’s Giant Boobs,” “Brintey’s New Nip Slip,” “Britney Peeing Herself,” “Hot Hollywood in a Bikini this weekend,” “Britney Wears a See Through Shirt,” and “Avril Topless:”

062907-wsnx-06.jpg

The site also has a feature called “Are you WSNXY?” that allows viewers to rate the “sexiness” of listeners who have submitted their pictures to the station:

062907-wsnx-07.jpg

While the site contains a “Hunk of the Day” section and runs syndicated photos of male models, the majority of the sexual content portrays women.

107.3 KLQ FM

The Citadel Broadcasting 107.3 KLQ website at www.wklq.com prominently features objectifying portrayals of women. The “Rock Girls” link is the second link on the site and is featured with a large banner on the homepage. That banner is an example of the “dismemberment” of women, with the woman in the image being reduced to nothing more than a body part:

062907-wklq-02.jpg

The “Rock Girls” feature contains pictures of women represented in an objectifying manner with photos provided by an entity called “ForPlayTV.com.” This is similar to what we found on the websites of other area stations:

062907-wklq-01.jpg

When we reviewed the rest of the site, we also found that the DJ known as Grey was hosting a “Bike Night” at Hooters restaurant and had a video of a woman dancing in a highly suggestive manner:

062907-wklq-03.jpg

101.3 FM THE FOX

Clear Channel’s 101.3 The Fox website at www.101thefoxrocks.com has a prominently linked “Babes” section that contains three features, “Wet on the Net,” “Babe of the Day,” and “Music Video Babes.” The “Wet on the Net” feature is a series of videos described by as “a daily dose of sexy women gettin’ wet and playful at the pool.” The videos consist of short daily features with the models who are asked questioned about their favorite places to have sex, favorite sex positions, and other similar questions. The images in the “Babe of the Day” section come from two sources, Stare Magazine and Covermodels.com. Stare Magazine describes itself as a “bikini magazine” and uses the slogan “we don’t even HAVE articles” to promote its content. Cover Models is a company that claims to feature “the world’s top swimsuit, fitness, lingerie, and glamour models.” Finally, the “Music Video Babes” section contains links to music videos from predominately female artists, with the only exception being three videos by Enrique Iggl, Diddy, and Aerosmith, all of which feature women in limiting roles. It is also worth noting that with the exception of Aerosmith, The Fox does not play the music feature in the “Music Video Babes” section. Unlike Clear Channel station I96, this Clear Channel station does not syndicate the male model content:

062907-fox-02.jpg

The site also features a “Celeb Babe Photos” section in which the focus is on displaying images of female celebrities:

062907-fox-01.jpg

97.9 FM WGRD

The Regent Broadcasting station WGRD’s website at www.wgrd.com has undergone a substantial change since the 2004 study and objectifying portrayals of women are almost completely absent. The only objectifying images were of “Team GRD” at Extreme Car Audio with the “Hooters Girls:”

062907-wgrd-01.jpg

This comes as somewhat a surprise given the station’s previous reliance on this type of content, particularly with programming by former DJ David Fox.

96.1 MAX FM

062907-i96-01.jpg

The Clear Channel owned 96.1 MAX FM website at www.i96.net has a prominently displayed “Babes / Hunks” link. The “Babe of the Day” link contains three features, “Wet on the Net,” “Babe of the Day,” and “Music Video Babes.”

The “Wet on the Net” feature is a series of videos described by as “a daily dose of sexy women getting’ wet and playful at the pool.” The videos consist of short daily features with the models who asked questioned about their favorite place to have sex, favorite sex positions, and similar questions. The images in the “Babe of the Day” section come from two sources, Stare Magazine and Covermodels.com. Stare Magazine describes itself as a “bikini magazine” and uses the slogan “we don’t even HAVE articles” to promote its content. Cover Models is a company that claims to feature “the world’s top swimsuit, fitness, lingerie, and glamour models.” Finally, the “Music Video Babes” section contains links to music videos from predominately female artists, with the only exception being three videos by Enrique Iggl, Diddy, and Aerosmith, all of which feature women in limiting roles.

The website also features a prominently displayed “Celeb Pics” photo gallery on the homepage, but it tends to be evenly split between men and women and essentially contains gossip rather than objectifying pictures of female celebrities.

In addition, the site contains a “Hunk of the Day” feature with models from Allamericanguys.com. However, this section is considerably smaller than the “Babe of the Day” feature.

1300 AM WOOD Radio

Interestingly, the Clear Channel operated WOOD 1300 FM radio station, which has a line-up of almost exclusively conservative talk radio, hosts content objectifying women. This content, objectionable in its own right, is puzzling given the positions of moral authority frequently claimed by the right wing talk show hosts featured on the station. Like many Clear Channel stations, WOOD Radio features syndicated content. A “Beckett’s Babe Gallery” page contains the now familiar “Wet on the Net,” “Babe of the Day,” and “Music Video Babes” section. The station of course plays no music, so it is clear that the “Music Video Babes” portion of the site exists only to attract male viewers and has absolutely no relationship to the format of the station.

062907-wood-01.jpg

Noteworthy Articles

The following articles of interest were published elsewhere on the web today:

Previously archived links are available on the news links page or on Media Mouse’s del.icio.us page. To recommend links, tag them with “mediamouserecommended” on del.icio.us or contact us via email.

Supreme Court Limits use of Race in Diversity Programs

photo of the supreme court

The Supreme Court today in a 5-4 decision issued a major ruling that threatens to undermine the desegregation of public schools mandated in the historic Brown vs. the Board of Education case. The ruling that schools cannot use race as the sole means of crafting policies designed to maintain diversity calls into question hundreds of programs around the country that consider race as a factor.

In the majority opinion, Chief Justice John Roberts asserts, “the way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.” Ironically, Roberts uses the historic Brown ruling to argue against the use of race in assigning students to schools, arguing that Brown “prevents states from according differential treatment to American children on the basis of their color or race.” Roberts further stated “government action dividing people by race is inherently suspect because such classifications … endorse race-based reasoning and the conception of a Nation divided into racial blocs, thus contributing to an escalation of racial hostility and conflict.” Justice Kennedy issued some criticism of Roberts’ position, arguing that race can be considered and refusing to enshrine the idea of “color-blindness” as a constitutional principle. Clarence Thomas, the only African-American judge on the court, agreed with the majority, stating, “what was wrong in 1954 cannot be right today” because “‘our Constitution is colorblind.”

In a strongly worded dissent, Justice Stephen Beyer wrote:

Finally, what of the hope and promise of Brown? For much of this Nation’s history, the races remained divided. It was not long ago that people of different races drank from separate fountains, rode on separate buses, and studied in separate schools. In this Court’s finest hour, Brown v. Board of Education challenged this history and helped to change it. For Brown held out a promise. … It sought one law, one Nation, one people, not simply as a matter of legal principle but in terms of how we actually live. [...]

The last half-century has witnessed great strides toward racial equality, but we have not yet realized the promise of Brown. To invalidate the plans under review is to threaten the promise of Brown. The plurality’s position, I fear, would break that promise. This is a decision that the Court and the Nation will come to regret.

Justice John Paul Stevens also criticized the majority decision, stating that it is a “cruel distortion” to use Brown as a means of justifying this decision. He went on to state, “it is my firm conviction that no Member of the Court that I joined in 1975 would have agreed with today’s decision.”

Civil Rights groups and public education advocates had warned about the consequences of such a ruling. When the case was argued before the Supreme Court in December of 2006, the group By Any Means Necessary (BAMN) organized a rally calling for the court to preserve the principles of Brown vs. the Board of Education. At the time, BAMN and others argued that the Supreme Court could return the education system to a “separate but equal” doctrine. The Bush administration sided with white parents in the case who claim that the programs in Seattle and Louisville targeted by the case discriminated against white students despite the fact that in Seattle and in Louisville, 80% or more of students were given access to schools of their choice. Rather than agreeing with the lower court opinion that the compelling interests of diversity justified these programs, the Bush administration instead argued that “the effects of past de jure segregation have been remedied” and that use of race as a measurement of diversity was tantamount to discrimination.

Of course, the arguments of Supreme Court’s majority and the Bush administration fail to consider the realities of an education system in the United States that is now highly segregated. Research by the Civil Rights Project at Harvard confirms this fact. In 2003, white students mad up 58% of the public school enrollment in the United States, with the average white student attending a school that is nearly 80% white. The average African American student attends a school that is 53% African American and the average Latino student attends a school that that is 55% Latino. African Americans and Latinos make up 17% and 19% of public school enrollment respectively. A study last November by the Center for American Progress titled “Lost Learning, Forgotten Promises,” further argued that integration in schools benefit students of color and improves educational equality at little cost to school districts.

A number of groups working on civil rights issued criticized the ruling as undermining efforts aimed at equality. The NAACP criticized the Court for a decision that “has condemned the minority children to a back seat in the race for life’s chances.” The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) argued that the case was a “significant step backwards in a nation where schools are becoming increasingly segregated by race and ethnicity.” The non-partisan policy group Demos also issued a statement charging that “a narrow Supreme Court majority has done a grave disservice not just to educational equity but to our democracy as a whole.” The three organizations supported the Court’s position that race and diversity remain important in the educational system, but were frustrated by the Court’s unwillingness to consider the merits of the two programs before them. Many Democrats in Congress have also expressed opposition the decision, with Congressional Black Caucus Chair and Michigan Representative Carolyn Kilpatrick stating “this heinous ruling not only topples more than half a century of progress achieved under the Brown v. the Topeka, Kansas Board of Education decision, it encourages separation and segregation in private industry and government as well as education.”

Several groups were still interpreting the Supreme Court’s lengthy opinion on Thursday evening and had not announced how they would respond to the decision. For their part, the NAACP says it has a plan that will be unveiled shortly to address institutional racism within the public education system in a manner consistent with the decision. Civil rights organizations will likely attempt to draft programs based on the Supreme Court’s contention that diversity is still a compelling education in the K-12 system, although with the Court’s conservative majority it remains to be seen whether the Court will be sympathetic towards arguments for diversity.

Anti-Nuclear Power Groups File Federal Court Appeal of Michigan’s Palisades Plant

photo of palisades nuclear plant

Don’t Waste Michigan and the Nuclear Information Resource Service (NIRS) have filed an appeal with a federal appeals court in Washington DC charging that the Palisades Nuclear Plant in Covert, Michigan violate earthquake-safety regulations by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The groups allege that containers of spent and irradiated fuel rods that sit 150 yards from water are a threat to both environmental and human health. The two groups argue that underwater submersion could cause the nuclear waste to overheat and cause a radioactive release. The issue is being addressed in the federal appeals court as all administrative approaches with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission have been exhausted.

The two groups have expressed concern over the safety of the Palisades nuclear power plant for decades, most recently objecting to the Nuclear Regulator Commission’s approval of a twenty-year license extension for Palisades.

Michigan Senators Split Vote on Measure Killing Immigration Reform

logo human rights have no borders

Today, Michigan Democratic Senators Carl Levin and Debbie Stabenow split on a procedural vote on the Comprehensive Immigration Reform bill before the Senate, effectively killing the measure. A motion to end debate on the bill–a necessary step to advance it in the Senate–failed by a vote of 46 to 53. Several Democrats, including Debbie Stabenow voted against ending the debate, guaranteeing that the vote would fall short of the 60 needed to end debate. Several Democrats expressed concern over amendments and consequently decided against allowing the process to move forward. For her part, Stabenow has not yet issued a statement explaining her vote.

Senator Levin voted to end the debate, arguing in his floor statement that “our immigration system is broken and needs reform” and that the bill was an opportunity to “make progress on a very difficult problem.” Levin also expressed support for the border security measures in the bill arguing that strong security measures must be included in the bill. Levin was frustrated that the bill did not move further, stating that due to filibusters the Senate was never able to fully consider the bill, nor were they allowed to address the amendments individually.

The bill had received a mix of support and criticism from immigrant rights activists, with some welcoming it as a less than perfect step in the right direction while others derided its guest worker provision as being “close to slavery.” Critics on the right described the bill as an “amnesty” measure that would give rights to “millions of illegals” and used xenophobic rhetoric to mobilize people against the bill.

Bloom Collective Now Open

photo of the bloom collective

The Bloom Collective, an infoshop and lending library of which Media Mouse is a part, is now open. The library had a successful opening potluck Tuesday night and will be open from 12:00pm to 8:00pm, Monday through Saturday. The Collective will continue to advertise the space heavily, but any assistance folks can give in promoting the space would be greatly appreciated. Additionally, to keep updated on events and other happenings at the space, sign-up for our listserv.

The Bloom Collective is located at 1134 Wealthy St SE in Grand Rapids (next to the Wealthy Street Theatre). The entire catalog is searchable via the web as well.

Group Petitions for Grand Rapids to become a “Fair Trade Town”

fair trade logo

The local group Fair Trade Awareness Initiating Relationships (FAIR) is organizing an effort to help Grand Rapids become a “fair trade town.” The designation, developed by the Fair Trade Foundation, is given to a city to cities that meet five criterion:

  • The local council must pass a resolution supporting Fairtrade, and serve Fairtrade coffee and tea at its meetings and in offices and canteens.
  • A range of Fairtrade products must be readily available in the area’s shops and served in local cafes and catering establishments (targets are set in relation to population)
  • Fairtrade products must be used by a number of local work places (estate agents, hairdressers etc) and community organisations (churches, schools etc)
  • Attract media coverage and popular support for the campaign
  • A local Fairtrade steering group must be convened to ensure continued commitment to Fairtrade Town status.

In pursuit of this goal, FAIR proposed a resolution to the Grand Rapids City Commission on June 19. According to an email sent by FAIR, the City Commission was supportive:

On Tuesday June 19th, 2007 a local Fair Trade group (FAIR), proposed to the Grand Rapids City council that they pass a resolution to make Grand Rapids a “Fairtrade City”. The mayor and city council members were interested in and supportive of this idea.

“Fairtrade City” is a status awarded by The Fairtrade Foundation describing an area which is committed to the promotion of Fairtrade Certified goods. There are many Fairtrade cities across the UK and Europe. In the U.S., Media, Pennsylvania has qualified, and many others are in the process of passing “Fairtrade City” resolutions.

We want Grand Rapids to become the next city to carry this honor and we hope that you feel the same!

The first step in this process is for the Grand Rapids City council to pass this resolution. We are very excited to invite you to join in the spirit of solidarity with us and make this a reality!

You can join in this movement by simply sending a letter to the Mayor of Grand Rapids supporting this important step towards building a more conscientious and FAIR city of Grand Rapids, where you live, work and celebrate your values.

Please send this opportunity on to your Grand Rapids friends and relatives!!

To make your solidarity effort today, simply copy and paste the letter below in an email to Mayor George Heartwell. His e-mail address is gheartwe@grcity.us.

Or to send a letter through the mail, print the attachment and address it to:

Mayor Heartwell

c/o Grand Rapids City Hall

300 Monroe Avenue NW

Grand Rapids, MI 49503-2206

Sample Email and Letter:

I am a resident of the City of Grand Rapids. I have learned about the opportunity for Grand Rapids to pass a resolution for a Fair Trade City as presented to the council on June 19th, 2007 . I am very much in support of Grand Rapid becoming a place for the fair trade movement to grow. I am a part of this community and I share the values of Fair Trade principles. The principles of respect for human rights and the environment are crucial to promoting a healthier and more just society. I support the Grand Rapids City Council to pass the Fair Trade resolution, showing our city also stands for these values.

Sincerely,

Name

E-mail

Address

Free Screening of Michael Moore’s Sicko Scheduled

sicko movie poster

Democracy for America of Kent County has scheduled a free screening of Michael Moore’s new documentary SiCKO on June 29. The film, which provides a scathing critique of the healthcare system in the United States, has been getting positive reviews from critics and those that have seen widely available bootlegs of the film on the Internet.

The film will be shown at 7:15pm at the Kent-Ionia Labor Council at 918 Benjamin NE in Grand Rapids. Doors open at 6:00pm and people are strongly encouraged to get there at 6:00pm as a previous free screening on Monday was filled to capacity with over 50 people in attendance. A potluck will take place at 6:30pm and following the film, a discussion will start at 9:15pm.

Noteworthy Articles

The following articles of interest were published elsewhere on the web today:

Previously archived links are available on the news links page or on Media Mouse’s del.icio.us page. To recommend links, tag them with “mediamouserecommended” on del.icio.us or contact us via email.

Racists Planning Rally in Kalamazoo

anti-racist action logo

A group of white supremacists and other racists are planning a rally in Kalamazoo, Michigan on August 4. The rally–to be held at a currently undisclosed location–is being billed as a “Rally Against Black Gang Terrorism” in response to allegations of attacks on white males by groups of African-Americans.

The rally is being organized by Hal Turner, a nationally known racist who hosts an Internet radio show and who has a history of making extremely racist statements. Even on the comments thread announcing the rally, Turner argues that “Kalamazoo doesn’t need a White Patrol, just a couple Lynchings” in response to a query about whether or not there are White Citizen’s Patrols in Kalamazoo to protect white people until the rally. Turner has extended an invitation to most racist groups to participate in the rally, including the Ku Klux Klan, the National Socialist Movement, the Aryan Nations, White Revolution, the National Alliance, the National Vanguard, the Creativity Movement, and members of the prominent racist website Stormfront.org. Turner will speak at the rally along with other prominent racists including Alex Linder of the racist Vanguard News Network, Michigan-based Pastor James Wickstrom of the racist Christian Identity movement, and Paul Gellar, a talk show host on Hal Turner’s internet radio network. Additionally, a Ku Klux Klan member from Michigan, Randy Gray, will speak at the rally.

At this time, no protest plans have been announced, but it is likely that the rally will be met with significant opposition. Over the past decade, rallies organized by the Ku Klux Klan, the National Socialist Movement, the Council of Conservative Citizens, and other racist groups in Michigan have been largely drowned out by protestors. A 2006 rally at the capitol in Lansing by the neo-Nazi National Socialist Movement had only 60 NSM members compared to as many as 500 protestors.

The rally announcement appearing on Hal Turner’s website:

“RALLY AGAINST BLACK GANG TERRORISM”

IN KALAMAZOO, MI

15 ATTACKS BY BLACKS AGAINST WHITES CALLS FOR PRO-WHITE RALLY

MARK YOUR CALENDARS: SAT. AUGUST 4, 2007 1:00 PM!

The story which prompted this rally is linked below. Additional rally details as to specific location, hotel, motel, maps etc will be upcoming on this site.

Confirmed Speakers include:

Alex Linder of VNN

Pastor James. P. Wickstrom

Paul Gellar, host of “Think Tank” Radio Show on TRN

Hal Turner

Randy Gray from Michigan

FORMAL PUBLIC INVITATION

I have reached out to NSM, AN, KKK and a host of other speakers. I am now also publicly inviting:

The American National Socialist Workers Party and their Commander, Bill White who is also invited to give speech at the event. I want to use this occasion to put the past behind us, mend fences and get back to the issues we both know need fighting for the benefit of White folks.

In addition, I am also publicly inviting members of Stormfront including Jamie Kelso and Don Black both of whom are also invited to give speeches.

I also invite ALL SKINHEADS, regardless of affiliation or geographic location.

Continuing with the public invitations, I invite WHITE REVOLUTION and its founder Billy Roper who is invited to give a speech.

I invite members of the National Alliance and members of National Vanguard.

I have already confirmed that members of the CREATIVITY MOVEMENT support this effort and are coming. Creators are welcome to attend and I urge Creators in the Chicago area to use this event to reinvigorate your local crews after some troubles set you apart for awhile.

Finally, I invite all other pro-White groups not heretofore mentioned, and all unaffiliated pro-white individuals. I mean no disrespect by omitting group names, but all of you know the list can get huge!

Dress Code:

I prefer all attendess dress in regular, casual clothing. Whether you choose to wear organizational clothing or regalia is strictly up to you but for the benefit of everyone, let’s keep the dress code to what we as typical, hard-working Whites usually wear.

SIGNS:

You are encouraged to bring large signs expressing your views. Refrain from attaching those signs to any kind of stick or pole because sticks and poles can be used as weapons and we don’t want any of that.

WEAPONS:

If you hold a valid permit to carry a firearm, you may exercise your right to do so if it conforms with Michigan state law. Otherwise, DO NOT bring any weapons of any type. I’m certain there will be a huge police presence and we want the cops to feel safe. After all, WE aren’t the problem, the savages ARE!

Personality Conflicts:

There are a lot of strong personalities in our movement and as I can personally attest, some of us may not feel comfortable around certain others. I am putting aside any animosity I may have and if I can do it, we all can. So please don’t be put off by who is or might be coming. We must put all petty differences aside for the benefit of the cause.

For more on organized racism in Michigan, visit Media Mouse’s the Far Right in West Michigan database.