Tag Archives: ann arbor

University of Michigan one of 21 schools to cut Russell contract over labor violations

University of Michigan Recently Cut Its Contract With Russell Over Labor Violations

In response to the closing of a garment factory in Honduras employing over 1800 workers after the plant unionized, the University of Michigan has cut its contract with the Russell Athletic Corporation. The cut is one of 21 contracts Russell has lost in the last two months.

The campaign, spearheaded by Students Organized for Labor and Economic Equality, was the twelfth such termination and received coverage in the New York Times. United Students Against Sweatshops, a national student/labor group, launched its campaign against Russell last year. Since February, multiple cuts have been reported every week at universities including Harvard, Minnesota, Purdue, Cornell, Wisconsin, Rutgers, and fourteen other schools.

Russell closed one of its Honduran plants, Jerzees de Honduras, after 750 workers decided to join a union. Management and workers were embattled over workers’ contracts, including access to clean drinking water, living wages, and an end to verbal abuse. In a statement to the New York Times, Russell admitted that “management mistakes were made that led to a failure to adhere” to “standards on freedom of association,” but the company has tried to salvage its public image through the use of a website, ReinInRussell.com, designed to fool people looking for USAS’ Rein In Russell site. It may be some time, however, before their public relations division can rebuild the company’s reputation, as the whole incident has been a PR debacle for the company.

West Michigan USAS affiliates have a history of contract fights over companies’ poor labor records, some of which have been successful. Grand Valley State University‘s USAS chapter pressured their school to terminate its contract with Taco Bell after tomato pickers in Florida, the Coalition of Immokalee Workers, demanded the first increase in their wages since the 1970s. While GVSU did not cut their contract, the students’ pressure against Taco Bell and its owner Yum! Brands was significant, and the CIW eventually won the campaign and have led successful fights against Burger King and McDonald’s.

In addition, Aquinas College‘s Social Action Committee led a successful campaign to terminate their school’s soda contract with the Coca-Cola Corporation in light of the company’s involvement in anti-union violence in Colombia. Members of the SINALTRAINAL union have been kidnapped, tortured, and murdered by paramilitaries in collaboration with bottling factory management for their unionizing efforts. In addition, the corporation has caused extreme environmental degradation including the poisoning of groundwater in India. Over forty universities around the country have cut their Coca-Cola contracts.

Support University of Michigan Professor in Tenure Case

Media Mouse recently learned that Andrea Smith, a professor at the University of Michigan who has done amazing work on feminism and Native American studies, might be denied tenure. We encourage people to send a letter supporting her receiving tenure and to watch a video of Andrea Smith’s lecture in Grand Rapids two years ago.

Here is a statement outlining the background of the situation and the steps that can be taken to support Smith:

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE February 25, 2008

Statement of University of Michigan Students and Faculty in Support of Andrea Smith’s Tenure Case

CONTACT: TenureForAndreaSmith@gmail.com

On February 22nd, 2008, University of Michigan’s College of Literature, Science and the Arts (LSA) issued a negative tenure recommendation for Assistant Professor Andrea Lee Smith. Jointly appointed in the Program in American Culture and the Department of Women’s Studies, Dr. Smith’s body of scholarship exemplifies scholarly excellence with widely circulated articles in peer-reviewed journals and numerous books in both university and independent presses including Native Americans and the Christian Right published this year by Duke University Press. Dr. Smith is one of the greatest indigenous feminist intellectuals of our time. A nominee for the 2005 Nobel Peace Prize, Dr. Smith has an outstanding academic and community record of service that is internationally and nationally recognized. She is a dedicated professor and mentor and she is an integral member of the University of Michigan (UM) intellectual community. Her reputation and pedagogical practices draw undergraduate and graduate students from all over campus and the nation.

Dr. Smith received the news about her tenure case while participating in the United States’ hearings before the Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination at the United Nations in Geneva, Switzerland. Ironically, during those very same hearings, the 2003 U.S. Supreme Court decisions that restricted affirmative action policies at UM specifically were cited as violations of international law. At the same time, there is an undeniable link between the Department of Women’s Studies and LSA’s current tenure recommendations and the long history of institutional restrictions against faculty of color. In 2008, students of color are coming together to protest the way UM’s administration has fostered an environment wherein faculty of color are few and far between, Ethnic Studies course offerings have little financial and institutional support, and student services for students of color are decreasing each year.

To Support Professor Andrea Smith: The Provost must hear our responses! Write letters in support of Andrea Smith’s tenure case. Address email letters to ALL of the following:

* Teresa Sullivan, Provost and Executive VP for Academic Affairs, LSA, tsull@umich.edu

* Lester Monts, Senior Vice Provost for Academic Affairs, LSA, lmonts@umich.edu

* Mary Sue Coleman, President, PresOff@umich.edu

* TenureForAndreaSmith@gmail.com

Voice your ideas on the web forum at http://www.woclockdown.org/

To Support Women of Color at Michigan and the Crisis of Women’s Studies and Ethnic Studies: Attend the student organized March 15th Conference at UM!!!! Campus Lockdown: Women of Color Negotiating the Academic Industrial Complex is free and open to the public. Speakers include renowned activists and scholars Piya Chatterjee, Angela Davis, Rosa Linda Fregoso, Ruthie Gilmore, Fred Moten, Clarissa Rojas, and Haunani-Kay Trask. For more information and to register, visit: http://www.woclockdown.org/.

TALKING POINTS YOU CAN USE IN YOUR SUPPORT LETTER:

* Smith is author of the following books:

o Conquest: Sexual Violence and American Indian Genocide

o Native Americans and the Christian Right: The Gendered Politics of Unlikely Alliances

o Sacred Sites, Sacred Rites

* Smith is editor and/or co-editor of the following anthologies:

o Color of Violence: The INCITE! Anthology

o The Revolution Will Not Be Funded: Beyond the Non-Profit Industrial

Complex

o Native Feminisms Without Apology

o Forthcoming on theorizing Indigenous Studies

* She has published 15 peer reviewed articles in widely circulated academic journals including American Quarterly, Feminist Studies, National Women’s Studies Association Journal, Hypatia, Meridians, and the Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion

* Smith is the recipient of numerous prestigious awards from organizations such as the Lannan Foundation, University of Illinois, Gustavus Myers Foundation, Ford Foundation

* Smith was cited in the U.S. Non-Governmental Organization Consolidated Shadow Report to the United Nations

* A co-founder of Incite! Women of Color Against Violence and the Chicago chapter of Women of All Red Nations, she has been a key thinker behind large-scale national and international efforts to develop remedies for ending violence against women beyond the criminal justice system. As a result of her work, scholars, social service providers, and community-based organizations throughout the United States have shifted from state-focused efforts to more systemic approaches for addressing Page 2 violence against women. In recognition of her contributions, Smith was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize in 2005.

* As of June 2007, Professor Smith’s book, Conquest: Sexual Violence and American Indian Genocide (2005) had sold over 8,000 copies. Three-fourths of these sales have gone to college and university courses. In addition, the leading Native studies organization, Native American and Indigenous Studies Association organized a special panel about this book at their last annual conference (2007). The international impact of Conquest is evidenced by its reprinting in Sami (Sweden) and in Maori Institutions in New Zealand; by Professor Smith’s invitation to participate in an academic workshop in Germany based on the book; and by the book’s frequent use in Native Studies classrooms in Canada.

* She has also played a key role in contributing social-justice based research, teaching, and community building at the University of Michigan.

* Under Andrea Smith’s mentorship, a large number of undergraduate and graduate students have grown as intellectual members of the UM’s campus community.

FACTS FOR DR. ANDREA SMITH’S TENURE CASE

* Her intellectual work contributes to the fields of Native American Studies, Women’s and Gender Studies, Ethnic Studies, Religious Studies, and American Studies.

* Smith is jointly appointed in the Program in American Culture and the Department of Women’s Studies at Michigan.

* The Program in American Culture gave a positive recommendation for Smith’s tenure, while the Department of Women’s Studies gave a negative recommendation. After the tenure recommendations were released from the two departments, the College of Literature, Sciences, and the Arts reviewed the tenure file and also gave a negative tenure recommendation.

* She is currently the Director of Native American Studies at Michigan.

Coke Misses University of Michigan Deadlines for Human Rights Investigation

killer coke: coke float poster

The Killer Coke Campaign–an international effort coordinating a campaign against Coca-Cola in response to the company’s human rights abuses in Colombia–is reporting that the University of Michigan is continuing to support allowing Coca-Cola products back on campus after they were banned in 2005. According to the campaign, Coca-Cola failed to meet deadlines set by the University’s administration for an investigation into labor abuses in Colombia as well as environmental issues in India. Coca-Cola products were allowed back onto the University of Michigan’s campus in the spring of 2006 after Coca-Cola assured the University that investigations would be conducted by the International Labor Organization (ILO) in Colombia. However, those investigations were not completed by the University’s March 31 deadline and a Coca-Cola executive led an effort to prevent the ILO from investigating the allegations.

In recent months, a number of schools have ended contracts with Coca-Cola including Grand Rapids’ Aquinas College, the University of Illinois at Urbana, and Banaras Hindu University in India. At press time, 45 colleges and universities have stopped selling Coca-Cola products according to the Killer Coke campaign.

Students Arrested at University of Michigan Sit-In

On Tuesday night, twelve students at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor were arrested after refusing to leave the office of the University’s president (video of the arrests: 1, 2). The students, part of the campus group Students Organizing for Labor and Economic Equality (SOLE), held the sit-in following eight years of organizing on the University of Michigan campus around the issue of sweatshop labor. Following the arrests, activists at the University of Michigan are calling on supporters to call the University or to complete an email action demanding that the charges be dropped and that the University sign-on to the Designated Supplier Program.

The Designated Supplier Program (DSP)–the focal point of the sit-in at University of Michigan–is a “comprehensive program for enhancing the enforcement of university codes of conduct” that govern the conditions under which apparel bearing university logos are produced. The DSP is seen as the “next step” in anti-sweatshop organizing on college campuses and a necessary move to enhance “codes of conduct” that were won by local affiliates of United Students Against Sweatshops (USAS) in the early 2000s as it provides critical monitoring and enforcement capabilities designed to ensure that university licensed apparel is not made in sweatshops. The program has been supported by thirty colleges and universities around the United States, including West Michigan’s Grand Valley State University (GVSU), as well as larger universities such as the University of Wisconsin Madison, Duke, and Indiana University.

At the University of Michigan, the University’s administration has refused to support the DSP despite student support. Following a 51-hour sit-in in 2000, the University of Michigan adopted a “code of conduct” that guarantees workers producing university apparel freedom from harassment and discrimination, but has no system that ensures compliance. Beginning in 2005, activists with SOLE have argued that the DSP would monitor factories and assure adherence to the University’s Code of Conduct. However, University President Mary Sue Coleman has refused to accept the DSP and sent the issue to the Labor Standards and Human Rights committee for investigation. The committee voted against adopting the DSP in April of 2006 but failed to provide an alternative measure despite concluding that current monitoring practices were insufficient. In March of this year, a Sweatfree Coalition-imposed deadline for adoption of the DSP was ignored without a response from University administrators, prompting the sit-in on Tuesday. Students argued that a second “report” by the committee to be released on April 20 would not make any substantive improvement in the conditions under which University apparel is made.

At the start of the sit-in, University President Mary Sue Coleman briefly told the students “we don’t accept demands from students.” Even as the sit-in progressed and received a considerable amount of media coverage (http://www.uofmsitin.com/press.html), President Coleman refused to discuss the issue with the students. The University did offer a meeting with an administrator named Gary Krenz and some other administrators, but that was it. According to the sit-in blog, the possible meeting was to be discussed Tuesday evening, but it is unclear as to whether or not the offer was accepted given the arrests.

University of Michigan Administration Building Taken Over, Students Demand Action Against Sweatshops

As of earlier today, student activists at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor have taken over an administration building to protest the university’s failure to sign on to the Designated Suppliers Program (DSP). According to a statement released by the group doing the sit in:

Students at the University of Michigan entered the President’s Office at about 9:00 AM, and said they were going to stay until the University takes steps to reverse their “complacency with U of M apparel being produced in sweatshops” said senior Noah Link. The students entered the building carrying backpacks full of food, sleeping bags, and laptops. “We’re prepared to say as long as we have to” said junior Aria Everts, “This process is 8 years in the making, we need to see it through.”

She was referring to the University’s Code of Conduct, forged until President Lee Bollinger, which codified a set of standards those like Nike and Addias must adhere to when producing apparel bearing the U of M Logo. “[University President] Mary Sue Coleman has acknowledged that the Code is rarely enforced, and that those factories that do enforce become uncompetitive and are shut-down, but has yet to take any proactive step to stem this problem” said junior Jason Bates.

The students say the occupation is eight years in the making. The Code of Conduct was produced out of a similar sit-in by the same group in 1999, after which they issued a statement saying their victory was a “down payment” on the University’s commitment to take a stand against sweatshops, “Today, we’re here to collect.” said Bates.

The students advocate signing on to the Designated Suppliers Program, which they say will “reward the high road” and create a “race to the top”, “empowering the University, giving it the tools it needs to enforce the [Code of Conduct]“, but that the University’s bureaucracy currently employs a “non-process” that “stalls instead of stimulates ideas on this issue” commented Link. “That’s why we’re here” said Everts, “Because the University won’t take action on this issue. We’ve tried their process, their meetings and forums and conferences, we’ve tried it for two years, and we’re still no closer to a solution.”