Tag Archives: religious right

Prince Connected Entities Funded Anti-Gay Marriage Proposition in Final Months of the Campaign

Holland Michigan's Elsa Prince Was One Of The Largest Individual Contributors To California's Anti-Gay Marriage Proposition 8

Back in 2008, we pointed out that Elsa Prince–a wealthy religious right funder from Holland, Michigan–had donated over $400,000 to California’s anti-gay marriage Proposition 8. Prince ended up being one of the largest contributors to the campaign, just as she was to Michigan’s anti-gay marriage initiative in 2004.

Final campaign contribution reports were released this week and do not show any further contributions to the ballot measure from Elsa Prince. However, two Prince connected entities did give money during the final months of the campaign:

Elsa Prince’s roll in funding Proposition 8 was highlighted in a television commercial aired by Californians Against Hate:

Kalamazoo Repeals LGBT Anti-Discrimination Ordinance

011309-lgbt.gif

Last night, the Kalamazoo City Commission repealed an anti-discrimination ordinance that sought to protect gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgendered residents of the city from discrimination in housing, employment, and public accommodations. The Commission voted down the ordinance rather than put it up for a citywide vote after receiving petitions from residents opposing the ordinance.

Opposition to the ordinance was spearheaded by the American Family Association of Michigan who collected signatures to force the city to either repeal the ordinance or put it up for a vote. The American Family Association of Michigan’s director Gary Glenn has said that such ordinances are “the bread-and-butter of [homosexuals'] national strategy.” An article in the rightwing World Net Daily said that:

“supporters of the campaign first seek so-called “non-discrimination” ordinances from local governments, then demand taxpayer subsidies for insurance for homosexual partners, Glenn explained. They then seek to incorporate protections for cross-dressing and other behaviors in state law and finally target the full legalization of homosexual marriage”

While Glenn has a history of emphasizing hyperbole over substance, the effort does mean that the ordinance is no longer on the books. The Kalamazoo City Commission is reportedly planning to put forward another ordinance in the future that would offer a compromise:

Mayor Bobby Hopewell: “My intent is that we will have an ordinance that will provide protections to gays, lesbians, bisexuals and transgender individuals.”

There is no time line for when a new ordinance might be considered or when–and if–negotiations would take place between opposing sides. According to the Kalamazoo Gazette there had been no opposition expressed at previous hearings.

Group Explains why it Disrupted Mount Hope Church

112108-bash_back.gif

Across the country, a protest by a queer and transgendered group in Lansing two weeks ago continues to get news coverage from mainstream outlets such as the Associated Press and Fox News.

In response to this attention and requests from reporters, Bash Back! has released a statement providing more background information on why they chose to disrupt a church service at Mount Hope Church. Aside from an interview in the Michigan newspaper Between the Lines, Bash Back! has been relatively silent in the media and much of the coverage has focused on tactics rather than Mount Hope Church.

In light of this, we are reprinting the Bash Back! statement here:

Bash Back! responds to the backlash

In the past weeks there has been an unprecedented amount of controversy and reaction to the Bash Back! action at Mount Hope Church, in Lansing Michigan. Thanks to the media (who have failed to cover this with any amount of effort or concern for the truth), as well as incessant bloging. Many important pieces of information have been lost, and at times, changed completely. We would like to set some things…”straight”! In order to provide a full explanation, we will break this into parts.

* Why Mount Hope Church?

* Why these tactics and what did we hope to

accomplish?

* Dispelling myths.

Why Mount Hope Church?

The first issue we would like to address is the nationally wide-spread question of, “Why Mount Hope Church?” (MHC) Good question. The first thing to realize is we did not just randomly pick a place, nor did we pick the biggest place. A lot of issues went into our decision; I will discuss the major ones: First, MHC’s stance on queer identities. In their recent press release, Dave Williams (or D-Willy as we affectionately refer to him) states that they simply see being gay as a sin equal to any other, such as, lying or stealing. This is a sneaky way of getting off the hook. You can see for yourself that they take it much more seriously.

According to one of MHC nearly all forms of sexual expression (and specifically homosexuality) are considered “sexual addiction”. Openly lumping homo’s in with such sinners as peeping-Toms, flashers and even rapists!!! These “addictions” they work to “cure” through strict “support groups” such as Dunamai (see web link at bottom).And at times even send men to live in brainwashing camps such as Pure Life Ministries (see bottom). They also organize with other ex-gay organizations such as Love in Action, Homosexuals Anonymous, and L.I.F.E. Ministries. It is clear that MHC takes an active approach to repress queer identity and all forms of sexual expression outsideof the Christian, straight, married and husband controlled structure. This ruins people’s whole lives and families by making them repress their desires so completely that they grow to hate themselves and/or act out against or ignore their spouses and families. This church is nothing short of a disease in the community, and in the minds of those who attend.

“D-willy”, Pastor of Mount Hope, (and personal enemy of Bash Back!) stated that he did not “choose to identify MHC as anti-choice”. However, every Halloween the Church puts on the heavily protested “Hell House”, an extremely offensive and yes RADICAL approach to shock people into their right wing belief structure. One of the rooms within this Hell House completely inaccurately depicts a womyn receiving an abortion. In the act, the doctor uses dirty tools, and horrible machine sounds play over loud speakers. With the presence of demons, and her screams of pain, one leaves feeling like they just witnessed a most violent atrocity. How is this not actively anti-choice?

Another important reason that MHC was chosen, was the deep personal tie many organizers have to the church. Some members of Bash Back! have been members of MHC. Others were raised in evangelical churches very similar in message and method. For them, this was a liberating step. A personal confrontation with those who had made the journey to adulthood and personal identity a struggle wrought with self-hate, repression, guilt and loneliness. All of which eventually evolved into healthy anger, strength, free sexual expression, and activism. This has helped to build a strong community within Bash Back! And we support their choice to confront those that would choose to put them back in that dark place of self-hate!

From here I could go into all the other reasons MHC should be confronted. For example, the undeniable fact that mega-churches are really just big business. Seen by the way they pressure their “congregation” (or audience) to buy their books and DVD’s and other products. Or the incredible amount of money grossed by that church in a year. Another reason is the international church plantings. MHC has No regard for indigenous culture. There are dozens of reasons we chose Mount Hope Church.

Related links:

L.I.F.E. Ministries:

http://www.freedomeveryday.org/men/index.php

Pure Life ministries:

http://www.purelifeministries.org/

Dunamai:

http://www.dunamai.org/

related article that mentions MHC’s involvement in ex-gay work:

http://www.ecinc.org/RealChanges.htm

“Our culture is permeated with sexual imagery. Magazine racks offer pictures of girls in teensy bikinis. Primetime situation comedies almost continually revolve around sexual storylines involving teenage promiscuity, extra-marital affairs, homosexuality and worse.”

“At times, a pastor or counselor may very well find himself helping men who frequent adult bookstores, strip clubs, massage parlors and prostitutes. On occasion, he may also be compelled to minister to men involved with peeking in windows, exposing themselves to women, making obscene telephone calls, sexually assaulting others, or even having sex with animals. He will most certainly deal with promiscuity–among teenagers and adults. More than likely he will minister to homosexuals–both male and female.”

What did Bash Back! hope to accomplish? Why these shocking tactics?

There were a few main points and goals of this action:

* To confront the oppressors that run the church and show them some of us are unafraid and will resist them. Calling them out IN FRONT of their congregation was an important part of that. Showing that we are angry with their destructive behavior was also an important part of the message.

* To provide a space for those who had been mentally tortured by MHC and other places similar to confront their “demons” and fight back! Their emotional health was a very real concern of this action.

* To show the youth we are not alone! With an action of great energy and helpful fliers we wanted to send a message of acceptance and understanding. We realize that thinking you might be queer in a church like that is terrifying. And unbearably lonely. By tossing out a thousand flyers we provided a way “out”. Or at least planted the seed.

* And to generate visibility to Bash Back!! To build momentum and give us energy to our movement. I think we nailed that one.

Prominent West Michigan Religious Right Activist Funding Anti-Gay Marriage Initiative in California

Elsa Prince–the prominent religious right activist who lives in Grand Haven, Michigan–is funding an anti-gay marriage ballot initiative in California. According to the website Mormons for 8, which analyzes donations to the ballot initiative as reported by California’s Secretary of State, Prince has made three donations to the campaign totaling $450,000. The initiative aims to make it a law that “Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid and recognized in California.”

In 2004, Prince was the top individual contributor to Citizens for the Protection of Marriage, contributing $75,000 to ban gay marriage in Michigan.

Elsa Prince has a long relationship with the religious right. Her and her deceased husband, Edgar Prince, established the Edgar and Elsa Prince Foundation which has generously funded the religious right. Similarly, she has been involved in various religious right organizations, including the Council for National Policy and Focus on the Family. Two of the couple’s children, Betsy DeVos and Blackwater founder Erik Prince, have also been involved in the religious right.

Agema Supporting so-called “Intelligent Design” Legislation

101907-dave_agema.jpg

Dave Agema, a West Michigan member of Michigan’s House of Representatives, recently joined with Representative John Moolenaar of Midland to introduce legislation that would support the teaching of intelligent design–otherwise known as creationism–in Michigan’s schools. The legislation, HB 6027, is based on draft legislation prepared by the Discovery Institute, a leading religious right think-tank on the issue of creationism and intelligent design.

The bill is designed to make the issue one of “academic freedom” rather than intelligent design, with advocates of the legislation arguing that it will “protect” teachers and enable them to teach about the strengths and weaknesses of scientific theories such as evolution and global warming. However, critics argue that it is “Trojan horse” legislation that instead encourages teachers to bring incorporate material that has no scientific basis and material that has been declared to be unconstitutional to teach.

In The Grand Rapids Press last week, Agema said that he believes “Nothing in science should be beyond scrutiny, not global warming, not intelligent design or cloning” and that “Students and teachers should be allowed to use facts to present alternative views.”

Richard and Helen DeVos Foundation Funding the Religious Right

As part of our ongoing maintenance of our Far Right in West Michigan database, Mediamouse.org updated grant records for the Richard and Helen DeVos Foundation. The foundation and the DeVos family have been significant funders of the religious right since its beginnings in the 1970s. The grant data that we added is for 2005 and includes grants to the following entities:

* The American Enterprise Institute, an influential pro-business rightwing think-tank, received $10,000.

* The Acton Institute, an economic right think-tank here in Grand Rapids, received $25,000.

* Campus Crusade for Christ received $25,000.

* Coral Ridge Presbyterian Church, the church of the late D. James Kennedy, received $1.8 million from the foundation.

* The Council for National Policy, a secretive organization that coordinates activities by the religious right and the larger rightwing movement, received $30,000.

* The Federalist Society, a conservative legal entity, received $25,000.

* Focus on the Family received $500,000.

* The Michigan-based Foundation for Traditional Values received $10,000.

* Gospel Communications International out of Muskegon, Michigan received $2.2 million.

* The Heritage Foundation, a prominent and individual rightwing think-tank, received $600,000.

* The Intercollegiate Studies Institute received $225,000.

* The Michigan-based Mackinac Center for Public Policy received $35,000.

* The rightwing media watchdog known as the Media Research Center received $100,000.

* The Pregnancy Resource Center, an anti-abortion organization in Grand Rapids, received $50,000.

* Prison Fellowship Ministries, headed by Watergate felon Chuck Colson, received $1 million.

* The US English Foundation received $25,000.

The Richard and Helen DeVos Foundation is one of the wealthiest conservative foundations in the United States.

Holland’s Prince Family Continuing to Fund the Religious Right

As part of ongoing updates to Mediamouse.org’s Far Right in West Michigan database, we have updated the listing for the Edgar and Elsa Prince Foundation. According to the most recent IRS records available, the foundation donated thousands of dollars to religious right and other rightwing organizations in 2006. Some of these organizations include:

* The Acton Institute–a rightwing economic “think-tank” here in Grand Rapids received $100,000.

* The Alliance Defense Fund, a religious right legal group, received $35,000.

* The Freemont, Michigan based American Decency Association received $5,000.

* The American Family Association received $5,000.

* The Competitive Enterprise Institute, which is most well known for downplaying the existence of global warming, received $5,000.

* Concerned Women of America, a prominent religious right organization, received $1,000.

* The Council for National Policy, a secretive organization that has historically acted as a venue for coordinating strategies across the religious right, received $45,500.

* The Grand Rapids, Michigan based Education Freedom Fund received $100,000.

* The Family Research Council received $168,500.

* The Free Congress Foundation received $10,000.

* The Muskegon, Michigan based Gospel Communications International received $300,000.

* The Midland, Michigan based Mackinac Center for Public Policy received $25,000.

* The Michigan Family Forum received 2006.

The Edgar and Elsa Prince Foundation is operated by Elsa Prince, her son Erik Prince (founder of Blackwater), Betsy DeVos, and Edgar and Elsa Prince’s other children. The foundation has funded religious right organizations for years and has been particularly important in providing support for the Family Research Council.

Blackwater CEO Avoids Having to Deal With the Press

Yesterday, May 19, the Economic Club of Grand Rapids hosted CEO and founder of Blackwater Worldwide, West Michigan native Erik Prince. The event–which was sold out–was open to members of the Economic Club, the media, and members of the general public who paid $35 for tickets. Prince spoke to an audience of 750 people in the Amway Grand Plaza Hotel and was seated at a table that included David Van Andel, Richard DeVos, and Dick and Betsy DeVos. Erik Prince’s sister, Betsy DeVos, introduced him and told the audience that Erik’s life work has been to “protect those who are vulnerable.” There was time for a few questions at the end of the talk, but the media was not allowed to ask any questions and Prince declined to answer at least one of the questions posed to him.

Prince used a PowerPoint presentation for his talk. Its cover page had an image of a military base with bold text that read, “In Support of Security and Peace Everywhere.” Prince began his talk about trying to convince the audience that the use of private military contractors is nothing new and has been part of the US military since the Revolutionary War. He cited several examples including Sir Walter Raleigh, but his favorite example was that of Prussian militarist Baron Friedrich Wilhelm Von Steuben. Prince also mentioned that some of the original firefighters in the US were private contractors, as were some US counterintelligence groups like the Pinkertons. He told the audience that the Pinkertons helped spoil a plot to assassinate President Abraham Lincoln in Baltimore, but failed to mention that the Pinkertons were hired spies for “the Robber Barons” of the 19th and early 20th century and that they were hired to infiltrate and target organized labor.

Next, Prince turned his attention to Blackwater Worldwide and stated that they train 35,000 military/law enforcement personnel annually. He explained that their facility in North Carolina is used by local law enforcement all the time and that consequently it is not “secretive” as Blackwater’s critics charge. Prince then mentioned Blackwater’s involvement with an Afghan counter narcotics program, but fails to mention that since the US invasion of 2001 Afghanistan has become the number one producer of heroin. He also went out of his way to mention that Blackwater flew 11,000 missions in Afghanistan in support of US military last year and that they delivered Christmas packages to the troops. “Some people say they support the troops, well, we really support the troops,” Prince said.

Prince discussed other services that Blackwater provides, including a new vehicle they have developed called the Grizzly Armored Personnel Carrier, which he claims would better protect US troops from roadside bombs. Prince said that he hopes the Department of Defense will invest in their product.

The rest of Prince’s presentation consisted of defending what Blackwater does and how they exist to serve American interests. Prince said that 90% of their employees take an oath to the US and that despite the claims that his private contractors commit abuses, “we go above and beyond what is required” with government accountability. Prince stressed that Blackwater believes in “market efficiencies” and that his organization is best equipped to provide training and logistical support for the “new style of warfare that is being waged around the world.”

Prince ended his presentation by talking about all of Blackwater’s “humanitarian efforts,” from rescuing US troops to providing disaster relief aid. He even told the crowd that just a few days earlier while in Holland, he received a phone call from three missionaries from West Michigan who were in Kenya. They asked Prince if he could assist them in getting out of that country, since tensions had increased in recent months.

The 40-minute presentation by Prince was over and those in attendance filed out of the room. In many ways, this event was a perfect opportunity for Prince to speak to a crowd that was most likely sympathetic to the work of Blackwater, not so much on partisan terms, but because of the company’s “free market” claims. Prince said at one point during his talk that Blackwater was nothing more than a “robust temp agency.”

Unfortunately, for the public, the press was not able to able to engage the founder of Blackwater, instead we were sequestered upstairs where we would not even be within eyesight of the war profiteer. Moreover, the press was not allowed to use cameras or tape the event. Prince was therefore able to avoid having to talk about the shooting of Iraqi civilians last September that led to a Congressional investigation. Prince’s ability to avoid public scrutiny also means he could avoid talking about his support of and ties to far right groups such as the Family Research Council.

Over the past two years, Mediamouse.org has done numerous stories on Blackwater, Erik Prince, and the Prince family including analyses of the media’s coverage of Blackwater and an interview with Jeremy Scahill, the author of the acclaimed book Blackwater: The Rise of the World’s Most Powerful Mercenary Army. Click here to read more.

God's Profits: Faith, Fraud, and the Republican Crusade for Values Voters

Click on the image to purchase this book through Amazon.com. Purchases help support MediaMouse.org.

There has been much written about what is termed the religious right in the United States in recent years, with a particular emphasis on its relationship to the Republican Party. Beginning in the 1980s with the excellent analysis of sociologist Sara Diamond, those on the left began to take seriously the influence that the religious right had influencing public policy. Sarah Posner’s recent book, God’s Profits: Faith, Fraud, and the Republican Crusade for Values Voters continues this important analysis.

Posner’s book looks at the current manifestations of apocalyptic teaching, also known as End Times teaching. The popular San Antonio TV evangelist John Hagee best represents the belief that we are living in the last days. Hagee is particularly influential with his active support of the state of Israel and his constant pressuring of US politicians to maintain that support. During the 2006 Israeli attack on Lebanon, Hagee even advocated that Israel or the US bomb Iran as a way of bringing about the Apocalypse.

While Posner devotes a chapter to the religious right’s influence on US foreign policy, the bulk of the book deals with what she calls the Prosperity Gospel movement. This movement believes that the Christian god wants believers to be materially wealthy and in fact, if they are wealthy, that is a sign of their faith in the divine. This is not necessarily a new belief, since the Protestant theologian John Calvin promoted a similar doctrine centuries ago with an emphasis on hard work that resulted in wealth. With the Prosperity Gospel movement less emphasis is put on hard work and more on belief and tithing. If you give a significant portion of your earnings to the church it will come back to you many times over is what this new movement preaches.

Some of the leaders of this movement are Hagee, Kenneth Copeland, and Rod Parsley. Parsley is probably not as familiar to many as Hagee and Copeland, but his influence is just as profound, particularly through his World Harvest Church. Parsley has perfected the art of convincing poor and working class believers into giving over what little money they have to keep Parsley living a life of private jets, multiple houses, and regular vacations in the most expensive tourist locations world wide. Posner does a good job of profiling people who have been bankrupted by the Prosperity Gospel preachers and even provides some documentation of overseas charity scams that some of these leaders have engaged in. The difficulty always lies with accountability since most religious organizations are tax-exempt, which makes it harder to track funding.

While this book provides some interesting insights into the Prosperity Gospel movement, it does not adequately address its relationship to the Republican Party. Posner does look at some of the key people in this movement who have developed relationships with the Bush administration, but the author does not spend adequate time exploring these relationships or how “values voters” end up influencing elections. Despite its shortcomings, God’s Profits is a valuable resource for those seeking to understand current trends within the religious right in the US.

Sarah Posner, God’s Profits: Faith, Fraud, and the Republican Crusade for Values Voters, (Polipoint Press, 2008).

Michigan Legislators Sponsoring Controversial “American Religious History Week” Resolution

Three Republican legislators representing Michigan in the United States House of Representatives are sponsoring a controversial resolution dedicating the first week of May as “American Religious History Week.” The resolution (H. Res. 888), which has gained the support of Michigan legislators Pete Hoekstra, Thaddeus McCotter, and Timothy Walberg, has been criticized for a series of 75 “whereas” statements that make distorted statements about United States’ history and the role of Christianity in that history. Many of the statements are designed to prove the idea that the United States is a “Christian nation” and give preference to Christianity as religion. Moreover, the resolution’s sponsor, Randy Forbes, has admitted that the resolution is a way to bring religion into the public schools under the guise of “history.” Author Chris Rodda has done an excellent job debunking the “history” used to justify this resolution and has pointed that several of the footnotes in the resolution do not prove the assertions made in the resolution.