Tag Archives: robert maginnis

Maginnis Speech on Iraq Protested at GVSU

On Tuesday, several members of the local group ACTIVATE passed out information outside of a speech given by retired Lt. Col. Robert Maginnis. The information outlined Maginnis’ history of fabricating information to support the war in Iraq, as well as his involvement in the religious right and his promotion of discrimination. The event was held on Grand Valley State University’s Allendale campus, and was put on by International Relations Organization, the GVSU Armed Forces Association, the Middle Eastern Studies Department, and the Student Life Fund. After discovering people were passing out information critical of Maginnis, a member of the International Relations Organization approached one activist and attempted to tell him that the information on the fliers was wrong. Upon questioning about what information was wrong, he replied that Maginnis was on CNN as well as Fox News. This person then returned to the building, only to return a few moments later to hassle the group more. He demanded to know who the leader of ACTIVATE was. When told there were no leaders and decisions were based on consensus, the man called the group “communists” and told everyone entering the building that the information they received was from “protesters”

Inside of the event Maginnis was greeted by a sympathetic crowd. His presentation began with a discussion of the war on terror, following which he made a jump into the War in Iraq with little explanation of how the two were connected. Throughout the speech, Maginnis made a variety of outlandish claims reminiscent of his claims made prior to the war in Iraq. Some examples of these claims are as follows:

  • He claimed that the Military Commissions Act grants all those subjected to it that same provisions of civil court.
  • He claimed we have “reason to believe that Iran will use nuclear weapons.”

  • He claimed that Iran wants a nuclear holocaust so that it can bring about the 12th imam.
  • He stated he thinks that Iranians were at the North Korean test of their nuclear weapon.
  • He admitted that the point of the war on terrorism is to impose a different way of life on people.
  • He advocated that the now Shite leader of the insurgency should have been rounded up and “taken some where” prior to his rise to a leadership position.
  • He made the absurd claim that anti-US sentiment is fueled by other countries’ hatred of our riches.

His discussion about detainees at Guantanamo Bay was also interesting, claiming that they were mostly picked off of the battle field. He also told of how you can smell the ocean from the cells. This was followed by a mildly offensive story about a man went in weighing 100 lbs, and now weighs 400 lbs because he loves the food and treatment so much. Maginnis reiterated his claim that interrogation of prisoners is not abusive, citing one prisoner that gave them information in return for a Twix bar and a copy of a Martha Stewart magazine. However, Maginnis’ claims about Guantanomo were contradictory as well. He claimed that everyone in the prison is a killer and an enemy that can’t be in society, while a few sentences later he bragged about how many inmates the US has released, and claimed that the US would let more go, but no countries want to take them.

Following the presentation, there was a Q and A section. During this a member of ACTIVATE pointed out Maginnis’ lie about people being charged under the Military commissions act being granted the same provisions as a civil court. In response to this Maginnis simply talked about how nice it is at Guantanamo Bay. The Grand Valley newspaper, the Lanthorn, ran an article in their Thursday edition on Magginnis’ visit. They cited many of his outlandish claims, but despite two letters to the editors, a press advisory from Media Mouse, and a group willing to talk to them, they failed to provide any other view on Maginnis’ claims. In fact, they reduced opposition to Maginnis to a “small group of protestors.”

Iraq Occupation Advocate, Religious Right Organizer to Speak at GVSU on Iraq

On Tuesday, November14, Retired Lt. Col. Robert Maginnis will speak at Grand Valley State University’s (GVSU) Allendale campus on “the Future of Iraq.” The event, which takes place from 5:00pm to 7:00pm at the Cook-DeWitt Center, is touted as a lecture by a “foreign affairs analyst” who will talk about the current situation in Iraq and the future of the country and US soldiers stationed there. There is no mention of the fact that Maginnis served as a part of former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld’s Military Analyst Group, was a former Fox News military analyst, is well-connected to the religious right, has a history of making false statements about Iraq, and has supported interrogation techniques used at Guantanamo Bay. According to information gleaned from GVSU’s website, the lecture is being sponsored by the International Relations Organization, the GVSU Armed Forces Association, the Middle Eastern Studies Department, and the Student Life Fund.

During the time that Maginnis was a military analyst with Fox News, he made a variety of baseless and misleading claims according to the media monitoring organization Media Matters. In December of 2002, Maginnis asserted that chemical warfare was going to be a large component of the Iraq War as the Iraqi military was “going to have … almost booby-trapped use of some chemicals in some built-up areas where civilians are going to be casualties” and in January of 2003 claimed that the Iraqi military would have “smallpox material that’s been weaponized” hidden in residential areas. On February 3, 2003, Maginnis claimed that the United Nations’ weapons inspections failed to find weapons because the teams may have been “infiltrated” by Iraqis and that information got to “the wrong people” who then cleaned up sites before the inspectors arrived. Just before the war started, Maginnis along with Bill O’Reilly on the O’Reilley Factor agreed that weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) would be found in Iraq within a month of the invasion. Maginnis has continued making similar statements since the invasion of Iraq and has argued that in Iraq the United States is killing terrorists “over there and not over here” echoing the common Republican justification for the occupation of Iraq that asserts that it is necessary to fight “terrorists” in Iraq rather than on the streets of the United States and has used al-Qaida and insurgent interchangeably. On CNN in October, Maginnis argued that the plan for winning the Iraq War is “very simple” as the United States just has to “kill the enemy.” In that same interview, Maginnis described Iraq as being a central component of “the War on Terror” as “the people that bombed us in New York City at the Twin Towers” have chosen to fight the United States in Iraq. Of these “jihadists,” Maginnis says that “we’ve killed a lot of them, but we haven’t killed, clearly, enough.”

Beyond supporting the occupation of Iraq, Maginnis has also supported the detention and interrogation of “terrorists” at Guantanamo Bay. In September on MSNBC, Maginnis explained that interrogators behave professionally, that new intelligence is coming out of there all of the time, and that he personally witnessed interrogators giving prisoners candy to get them to talk. Maginnis has asserted that prisoners at Guantanamo do not need to be held in accordance to the Geneva Convention because they legal prisoners of war because they do not abide by the rules of war. Moreover, Maginnis argued that prisoners “try to kill us everyday” and that keeping them there keeps them “off the streets.”

In addition to his role in the military, Maginnis also has a long history of involvement with the religious right that continues to this day. In the 1990s Maginnis served as Vice President of Policy at the Family Research Council, which is one of the major religious right lobbying organizations. During that time, Maginnis opposed allowing homosexuals in the military—a position that he still holds—and also blamed the “radical feminist views embraced by the modern military” for making the military a “liberal Petri dish.” Maginnis favors excluding gays outright from military service because he claims that it undermines the “cohesion” of military units, despite research showing that gays can serve without compromising military objectives. Maginnis helped create the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy, arguing that if gays could not be excluded from the military that they should not be allowed to serve openly. His exclusionary and discriminatory views have not been restricted to gays, as Maginnis has also argued that women should not be allowed to serve, that the military should think carefully before allowing Muslims to serve at West Point, and that Wiccans should be excluded. Maginnis has asserted that women should not be allowed to serve because they allegedly lack the strength of men and because military service undermines their value as the “bearers and nurturers of future generations,” two arguments that reflect the patriarchal views held by the religious right with whom he is closely aligned. He has also suggested that Muslims should not be allowed to attend West Point, with Maginnis arguing in October of this year that the military should be selective when admitting Muslims, questioned the decision to build religious facilities for Muslims at West Point, and questioned the loyalty of Muslims in the military. Maginnis asserted that Muslims might place the ideas in the Koran, specifically the “coming Caliphate—the domination of Islam across the world—and your [a Muslim’s] personal obligation to it,” above the goals of the military and suggested that Islam was inherently extreme by stating that cadets would have to be moderate or “not faithful to the tenets of Islam.” As part of a religious right boycott of the Army in the late 1990s, Maginnis wrote a paper arguing that Wiccans in the military threatened unit cohesion, morale, and efficiency and that consequently their religious rights should be limited. It is worth noting that Maginnis consistently uses the “unit cohesion” justification when seeking to exclude groups or to justify positions advocated by the religious right.